Background
Methods
ILE framework from a socio-ecological perspective
Evaluated ILE
Models and statistical methods
Data collection
Results
Differentials in ILE and indicators
Variable
|
N
| Mean | StDev
a
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILE
|
108
|
14.82
|
10.93
|
2.8
|
51.2
|
GC
|
108
|
38.12
|
8.63
|
24.8
|
65
|
FSE
|
108
|
58.46
|
30.74
|
0.9
|
100
|
MSE
|
108
|
64.16
|
27.65
|
3.2
|
100
|
OPW
|
108
|
29,829.06
|
24,751.46
|
1857
|
92,694
|
OPR
|
108
|
58.48
|
37.13
|
0.9
|
100
|
Predictive variables for the ILE
Variables
|
Correlations Coefficient
|
t
-value
|
p
-value
| R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
GC
|
0.335
|
3.658
|
0.001
|
0.112
|
FSE
|
−0.757
|
−11.937
|
0.001
|
0.573
|
MSE
|
−0.741
|
−11.356
|
0.001
|
0.549
|
OPW
|
−0.714
|
−10.485
|
0.001
|
0.509
|
OPR
|
−0.641
|
−8.598
|
0.001
|
0.412
|
Variables
|
Coefficient
|
t
-value
|
p
-value
| R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
GC
|
0.174
|
2.294
|
0.024
| 0.439 |
OPR
|
−0.594
|
−7.821
|
0.001
| |
FSE
|
−0.506
|
−6.351
|
0.001
| 0.645 |
OPW
|
−0.368
|
−4.613
|
0.001
| |
MSE
|
−0.479
|
−6.165
|
0.001
| 0.641 |
OPW
|
−0.399
|
−5.141
|
0.001
| |
MSE
|
−0.587
|
−6.211
|
0.001
| 0.569 |
OPR
|
−0.211
|
−2.222
|
0.001
| |
OPW
|
−0.514
|
−6.191
|
0.001
| 0.568 |
OPR
|
−0.315
|
−3.799
|
0.001
|
Model 1 | |
Y = 26.302 + 0.074GC - 0.754FSE - 0.024MSE | R2 = 0.578, F-Value =47.459, P = 0.001 |
Model 2 | |
Y = 21.929 + 0.095GC - 0.491OPW - 0.305OPR | R2 = 0.576, F-Value =47.178, P = 0.001 |
Model 3 | |
Y = 29.092 + 0.031GC - 0.365FSE - 0.098MSE - 0.352OPW - 0.061OPR | R2 = 0.648, F-Value =37.651, P = 0.001 |