Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2023

12.09.2022 | Review

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

verfasst von: Xue Li, Changlin Sui, Xiujuan Xia, Xianjin Chen

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) has been used in aesthetic applications worldwide, including glabellar lines. Currently, four BoNT/A preparations were approved for the improvement of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, incobotulinumtoxinA, and prabotulinumtoxinA. DaxibotulinumtoxinA is a new form of BoNT/A drug that is developed in clinical application. We performed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the efficacy and safety of all these different BoNT/A formulations for treating glabellar lines.

Methods

The investigators searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms “botulinum toxin” and “glabellar lines.” We searched the relevant studies in electronic databases as following: PubMed, Elsevier, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The end points included the percentage of subjects with a glabellar line severity (GLS) score of none (0) or mild (1), and the percentage of subjects achieving ≥ 1-point and 2-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown at approximately month 1 by the investigators’ assessment.

Results

All formulations of BoNT/A were far superior to placebo in efficacy. DaxibotulinumtoxinA was the only treatment that significantly increased the proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 1 point improvement in GLS score compared with other BoNT/A formulations. Moreover, daxibotulinumtoxinA was ranked the highest for the proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 2-point improvement in GLS score. No significant differences were revealed for the incidence of any adverse events (AEs) that related to treatment or drug among all BoNT/A preparations.

Conclusion

The overall results of this NMA suggested that daxibotulinumtoxinA is a new BoNT/A preparation that may be not only more effective but also well-tolerated for the treatment of glabellar lines.

Level of Evidence I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BJ, Kwon HH, Park SY et al (2014) Double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial of a novel botulinum toxin A processed from the strain CBFC26, compared with onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 28(12):1761–1767CrossRefPubMed Kim BJ, Kwon HH, Park SY et al (2014) Double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial of a novel botulinum toxin A processed from the strain CBFC26, compared with onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 28(12):1761–1767CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawashima M, Harii K, Horiuchi Y et al (2020) Safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of upper facial lines in Japanese subjects. Dermatol Surg 46(4):483–490CrossRefPubMed Kawashima M, Harii K, Horiuchi Y et al (2020) Safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of upper facial lines in Japanese subjects. Dermatol Surg 46(4):483–490CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat William Hanke C, Narins RS, Brandt F et al (2013) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase iii trial investigating the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines using a stringent composite endpoint. Dermatol Surg 39(6):891–899CrossRefPubMed William Hanke C, Narins RS, Brandt F et al (2013) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase iii trial investigating the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines using a stringent composite endpoint. Dermatol Surg 39(6):891–899CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo KH, Lee YW, Lee JS et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of a new botulinum toxin (HU-014) versus existing onabotulinumtoxin A in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 47(3):e91–e96PubMed Yoo KH, Lee YW, Lee JS et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of a new botulinum toxin (HU-014) versus existing onabotulinumtoxin A in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 47(3):e91–e96PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubanova E, Haddad TM, Bergerova Y et al (2018) Assessment of subject and physician satisfaction after long-term treatment of glabellar lines with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport((R))/Azzalure((R))): primary results of the APPEAL noninterventional study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(6):1672–1680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gubanova E, Haddad TM, Bergerova Y et al (2018) Assessment of subject and physician satisfaction after long-term treatment of glabellar lines with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport((R))/Azzalure((R))): primary results of the APPEAL noninterventional study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(6):1672–1680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoelin SG, Dhawan SS, Vitarella D et al (2018) Safety and efficacy of EB-001, a novel type E botulinum toxin, in subjects with glabellar frown lines: results of a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(6):847e–855eCrossRefPubMed Yoelin SG, Dhawan SS, Vitarella D et al (2018) Safety and efficacy of EB-001, a novel type E botulinum toxin, in subjects with glabellar frown lines: results of a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(6):847e–855eCrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ascher B, Rzany B, Kestemont P et al (2020) Liquid formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA: A 6-month, phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a single treatment, ready-to-use toxin for moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. Aesthetic Surg J 40(1):93–104CrossRef Ascher B, Rzany B, Kestemont P et al (2020) Liquid formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA: A 6-month, phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a single treatment, ready-to-use toxin for moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. Aesthetic Surg J 40(1):93–104CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Polacco MA, Singleton AE, Barnes CH et al (2021) A double-blind, randomized clinical trial to determine effects of increasing doses and dose-response relationship of incobotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar rhytids. Aesthetic Surg J 41(6):500–511CrossRef Polacco MA, Singleton AE, Barnes CH et al (2021) A double-blind, randomized clinical trial to determine effects of increasing doses and dose-response relationship of incobotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar rhytids. Aesthetic Surg J 41(6):500–511CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogilvie P, Rivkin AZ, Dayan S et al (2019) Onabotulinumtoxin A for treatment of forehead and glabellar lines: subject-reported satisfaction and impact from a phase 3 double-blind study. Dermatol Surg 45(5):689–699CrossRefPubMed Ogilvie P, Rivkin AZ, Dayan S et al (2019) Onabotulinumtoxin A for treatment of forehead and glabellar lines: subject-reported satisfaction and impact from a phase 3 double-blind study. Dermatol Surg 45(5):689–699CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kane MA, Gold MH, Coleman WR et al (2015) A randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the equivalence of incobotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A for glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 41(11):1310–1319CrossRefPubMed Kane MA, Gold MH, Coleman WR et al (2015) A randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the equivalence of incobotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A for glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 41(11):1310–1319CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moers-Carpi M, Dirschka T, Feller-Heppt G et al (2012) A randomised, double-blind comparison of 20 units of onabotulinumtoxin A with 30 units of incobotulinumtoxin A for glabellar lines. J Cosmet Laser Ther 14(6):296–303CrossRefPubMed Moers-Carpi M, Dirschka T, Feller-Heppt G et al (2012) A randomised, double-blind comparison of 20 units of onabotulinumtoxin A with 30 units of incobotulinumtoxin A for glabellar lines. J Cosmet Laser Ther 14(6):296–303CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlessinger J, Cohen JL, Shamban A et al (2021) A multicenter study to evaluate subject satisfaction with two treatments of abobotulinumtoxin A a year in the glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 47(4):504–509CrossRefPubMed Schlessinger J, Cohen JL, Shamban A et al (2021) A multicenter study to evaluate subject satisfaction with two treatments of abobotulinumtoxin A a year in the glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 47(4):504–509CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufman J, Cohen JL, Peredo MI et al (2019) Clinical assessment of 2 licensed abobotulinumtoxin A injection volumes for the treatment of glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 45(10):1274–1284CrossRefPubMed Kaufman J, Cohen JL, Peredo MI et al (2019) Clinical assessment of 2 licensed abobotulinumtoxin A injection volumes for the treatment of glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 45(10):1274–1284CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlessinger J, Friedmann DP, Mayoral F et al (2021) Abobotulinumtoxin A treatment of glabellar lines using a new reconstitution and injection volume: randomized, Placebo-controlled data. J Drugs Dermatol 20(9):988–995CrossRefPubMed Schlessinger J, Friedmann DP, Mayoral F et al (2021) Abobotulinumtoxin A treatment of glabellar lines using a new reconstitution and injection volume: randomized, Placebo-controlled data. J Drugs Dermatol 20(9):988–995CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kestemont P, Hilton S, Andriopoulos B et al (2022) Long-term efficacy and safety of liquid abobotulinumtoxina formulation for moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: a phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and open-label study. Aesthetic Surg J 42(3):301–313CrossRef Kestemont P, Hilton S, Andriopoulos B et al (2022) Long-term efficacy and safety of liquid abobotulinumtoxina formulation for moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: a phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and open-label study. Aesthetic Surg J 42(3):301–313CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones D, Carruthers J, Narins RS et al (2014) Efficacy of incobotulinumtoxin A for treatment of glabellar frown lines: a post hoc pooled analysis of 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Dermatol Surg 40(7):776–785PubMed Jones D, Carruthers J, Narins RS et al (2014) Efficacy of incobotulinumtoxin A for treatment of glabellar frown lines: a post hoc pooled analysis of 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Dermatol Surg 40(7):776–785PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Coleman WR et al (2013) Multicenter, randomized, phase III study of a single dose of incobotulinumtoxin A, free from complexing proteins, in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 39(4):551–558CrossRefPubMed Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Coleman WR et al (2013) Multicenter, randomized, phase III study of a single dose of incobotulinumtoxin A, free from complexing proteins, in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 39(4):551–558CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sattler G, Callander MJ, Grablowitz D et al (2010) Noninferiority of incobotulinumtoxin A, free from complexing proteins, compared with another botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 36(Suppl 4):2146–2154CrossRefPubMed Sattler G, Callander MJ, Grablowitz D et al (2010) Noninferiority of incobotulinumtoxin A, free from complexing proteins, compared with another botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 36(Suppl 4):2146–2154CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Beer KR, Shamban AT, Avelar RL et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of glabellar lines in adult subjects: results from 2 identical phase III studies. Dermatol Surg 45(11):1381–1393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beer KR, Shamban AT, Avelar RL et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of glabellar lines in adult subjects: results from 2 identical phase III studies. Dermatol Surg 45(11):1381–1393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rzany BJ, Ascher B, Avelar RL et al (2020) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase III, non-inferiority study comparing prabotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients. Aesthet Surg J 40(4):413–429PubMed Rzany BJ, Ascher B, Avelar RL et al (2020) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase III, non-inferiority study comparing prabotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients. Aesthet Surg J 40(4):413–429PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Won CH, Kim HK, Kim BJ et al (2015) Comparative trial of a novel botulinum neurotoxin type A versus onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. Int J Dermatol 54(2):227–234CrossRefPubMed Won CH, Kim HK, Kim BJ et al (2015) Comparative trial of a novel botulinum neurotoxin type A versus onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. Int J Dermatol 54(2):227–234CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertucci V, Humphrey S, Carruthers J et al (2017) Comparing injectable daxibotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A in moderate and severe glabellar lines: additional analyses from a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, multicenter study. Dermatol Surg 43(Suppl 3):S262–S273CrossRefPubMed Bertucci V, Humphrey S, Carruthers J et al (2017) Comparing injectable daxibotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A in moderate and severe glabellar lines: additional analyses from a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, multicenter study. Dermatol Surg 43(Suppl 3):S262–S273CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo Y, Lu Y, Liu T et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines: a meta-analysis of randomized, Placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(3):310e–318eCrossRefPubMed Guo Y, Lu Y, Liu T et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines: a meta-analysis of randomized, Placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(3):310e–318eCrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162(11):777–784CrossRefPubMed Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162(11):777–784CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT (2020) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Higgins JPT (2020) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai F, Li GG, Liu Q et al (2019) Short-term efficacy and safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Immunol Res 2019:2546161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bai F, Li GG, Liu Q et al (2019) Short-term efficacy and safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Immunol Res 2019:2546161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP et al (2021) Abobotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: a randomized, dose-escalating, double-blind study. J Drugs Dermatol 20(9):980–987CrossRefPubMed Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP et al (2021) Abobotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: a randomized, dose-escalating, double-blind study. J Drugs Dermatol 20(9):980–987CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Monheit GD, Baumann L, Maas C et al (2020) Efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction after abobotulinumtoxin A treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 46(1):61–69CrossRefPubMed Monheit GD, Baumann L, Maas C et al (2020) Efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction after abobotulinumtoxin A treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines. Dermatol Surg 46(1):61–69CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandt F, Swanson N, Baumann L et al (2009) Randomized, placebo-controlled study of a new botulinum toxin type a for treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy and safety. Dermatol Surg 35(12):1893–1901CrossRefPubMed Brandt F, Swanson N, Baumann L et al (2009) Randomized, placebo-controlled study of a new botulinum toxin type a for treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy and safety. Dermatol Surg 35(12):1893–1901CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ascher B, Kestemont P, Boineau D et al (2018) Liquid formulation of Abobotulinumtoxin A exhibits a favorable efficacy and safety profile in moderate to severe glabellar lines: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled trial. Aesthetic Surg J 38(2):183–191CrossRef Ascher B, Kestemont P, Boineau D et al (2018) Liquid formulation of Abobotulinumtoxin A exhibits a favorable efficacy and safety profile in moderate to severe glabellar lines: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled trial. Aesthetic Surg J 38(2):183–191CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanke CW, Narins RS, Brandt F et al (2013) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines using a stringent composite endpoint. Dermatol Surg 39(6):891–899CrossRefPubMed Hanke CW, Narins RS, Brandt F et al (2013) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines using a stringent composite endpoint. Dermatol Surg 39(6):891–899CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rzany BJ, Ascher B, Avelar RL et al (2020) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase III, non-inferiority study comparing prabotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients. Aesthetic Surg J 40(4):413–429 Rzany BJ, Ascher B, Avelar RL et al (2020) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase III, non-inferiority study comparing prabotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients. Aesthetic Surg J 40(4):413–429
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Carruthers JD, Fagien S, Joseph JH et al (2017) Injectable daxibotulinumtoxina for the treatment of glabellar lines: a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, multicenter comparison with onabotulinumtoxina and placebo. Dermatol Surg 43(11):1321–1331CrossRefPubMed Carruthers JD, Fagien S, Joseph JH et al (2017) Injectable daxibotulinumtoxina for the treatment of glabellar lines: a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, multicenter comparison with onabotulinumtoxina and placebo. Dermatol Surg 43(11):1321–1331CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Carruthers JD, Fagien S, Joseph JH et al (2020) Daxibotulinumtoxin A for injection for the treatment of glabellar lines: results from each of two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). Plast Reconstr Surg 145(1):45–58CrossRefPubMed Carruthers JD, Fagien S, Joseph JH et al (2020) Daxibotulinumtoxin A for injection for the treatment of glabellar lines: results from each of two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). Plast Reconstr Surg 145(1):45–58CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerscher M, Fabi S, Fischer T et al (2021) Incobotulinumtoxin A demonstrates safety and prolonged duration of effect in a dose-ranging study for glabellar lines. J Drugs Dermatol JDD 20(10):1052–1060PubMed Kerscher M, Fabi S, Fischer T et al (2021) Incobotulinumtoxin A demonstrates safety and prolonged duration of effect in a dose-ranging study for glabellar lines. J Drugs Dermatol JDD 20(10):1052–1060PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabi SG, Cohen JL, Green LJ et al (2021) Daxibotulinumtoxin A for injection for the treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy results from SAKURA 3, a large, open-label, phase 3 safety study. Dermatol Surg 47(1):48–54CrossRefPubMed Fabi SG, Cohen JL, Green LJ et al (2021) Daxibotulinumtoxin A for injection for the treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy results from SAKURA 3, a large, open-label, phase 3 safety study. Dermatol Surg 47(1):48–54CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Glogau R, Kontis TC, Liu Y et al (2021) Progressive improvement in static glabellar lines after repeated treatment with daxibotulinumtoxina for injection. Dermatol Surg 47(12):1579–1584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glogau R, Kontis TC, Liu Y et al (2021) Progressive improvement in static glabellar lines after repeated treatment with daxibotulinumtoxina for injection. Dermatol Surg 47(12):1579–1584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J et al (2020) DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol 82(4):838–845CrossRefPubMed Bertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J et al (2020) DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol 82(4):838–845CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
verfasst von
Xue Li
Changlin Sui
Xiujuan Xia
Xianjin Chen
Publikationsdatum
12.09.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03018-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.