Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2016

25.07.2016 | Original Article

Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery

verfasst von: Daniel C. Steinemann, Sebastian H. Lamm, Andreas Zerz

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

Energy devices represent an alternative to clips and staplers for vessel sealing. Outcome data of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with use of a novel combined ultrasonic and bipolar energy device (TB, Thunderbeat™) was gathered.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery using TB were prospectively included between November 2011 and January 2016. Large vessels were dissected using the energy device without additional clips or staplers. The type of procedure, operative time, length of stay, complications, blood transfusions, number and type of vessels being dissected, and need for additional clips were noted.

Results

Six hundred eighty-three patients underwent 758 procedures with dissection of 1310 large vessels. No additional hemoclips or vascular staplers were used. There were 0.7 % (5/758) intraoperative and 2.6 % (20/758) postoperative bleeding complications. Eleven bleeding occurred at the stapler line of anastomosis, leaving 1.8 % (14/758) bleeding that were potentially related to inadequate hemostasis. Failure of large vessel dissection occurred in two cases (0.15 %, 2/1310) and device-related complications in 1.1 % (8/758). Two of 42 conversions (5.5 %) were bleeding-related.

Conclusion

TB provides a reliable and effective hemostasis. However, ligation failure may occur. As with any kind of electrosurgery, the hot tip of the instruments bears the risk of potentially fatal thermal injuries.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyons SD, Law KS (2013) Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 20:301–307CrossRefPubMed Lyons SD, Law KS (2013) Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 20:301307CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith R, Pasic R (2008) The role of vessel sealing technologies in laparoscopic surgery. Surgical technology international 17:208–212PubMed Smith R, Pasic R (2008) The role of vessel sealing technologies in laparoscopic surgery. Surgical technology international 17:208212PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandberg EM, Cohen SL, Jansen FW, Einarsson JI (2016) Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Conversion of Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 23:352–357CrossRefPubMed Sandberg EM, Cohen SL, Jansen FW, Einarsson JI (2016) Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Conversion of Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 23:352357CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sultan AM, El Nakeeb A, Elshehawy T, Elhemmaly M, Elhanafy E, Atef E (2013) Risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: retrospective analysis of ten years’ experience at a single tertiary referral centre. Digestive surgery 30:51–55CrossRefPubMed Sultan AM, El Nakeeb A, Elshehawy T, Elhemmaly M, Elhanafy E, Atef E (2013) Risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: retrospective analysis of ten years’ experience at a single tertiary referral centre. Digestive surgery 30:5155CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sankaranarayanan G, Resapu RR, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg S, De S (2013) Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surgical endoscopy 27:3056–3072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sankaranarayanan G, Resapu RR, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg S, De S (2013) Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surgical endoscopy 27:30563072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubner M, Demartines N, Muller S, Dindo D, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2008) Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The British journal of surgery 95:1098–1104CrossRefPubMed Hubner M, Demartines N, Muller S, Dindo D, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2008) Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The British journal of surgery 95:10981104CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Seehofer D, Mogl M, Boas-Knoop S, Unger J, Schirmeier A, Chopra S, Eurich D (2012) Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments. Surgical endoscopy 26:2541–2549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seehofer D, Mogl M, Boas-Knoop S, Unger J, Schirmeier A, Chopra S, Eurich D (2012) Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments. Surgical endoscopy 26:25412549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom JW, Trencheva K, Sonoda T, Nandakumar G, Shukla PJ, Lee S (2015) A prospective trial evaluating the clinical performance of a novel surgical energy device in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surgical endoscopy 29:1161–1166CrossRefPubMed Milsom JW, Trencheva K, Sonoda T, Nandakumar G, Shukla PJ, Lee S (2015) A prospective trial evaluating the clinical performance of a novel surgical energy device in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surgical endoscopy 29:11611166CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Rossitto C, Costantini B, Gueli-Alletti S, Avenia N, Iodice R, Scambia G (2013) A randomized study comparing the use of Thunderbeat technology vs. standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Rossitto C, Costantini B, Gueli-Alletti S, Avenia N, Iodice R, Scambia G (2013) A randomized study comparing the use of Thunderbeat technology vs. standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surgical endoscopy 20:263–269CrossRefPubMed Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surgical endoscopy 20:263269CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Lorenzo N, Franceschilli L, Allaix ME, Asimakopoulos AD, Sileri P, Gaspari AL (2012) Radiofrequency versus ultrasonic energy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis of operative time and blood loss. Surgical endoscopy 26:2917–2924CrossRefPubMed Di Lorenzo N, Franceschilli L, Allaix ME, Asimakopoulos AD, Sileri P, Gaspari AL (2012) Radiofrequency versus ultrasonic energy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis of operative time and blood loss. Surgical endoscopy 26:29172924CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kambakamba P, Dindo D, Nocito A, Clavien PA, Seifert B, Schafer M, Hahnloser D (2014) Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection--better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery / Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 399:297–305CrossRefPubMed Kambakamba P, Dindo D, Nocito A, Clavien PA, Seifert B, Schafer M, Hahnloser D (2014) Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection--better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery / Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 399:297305CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of surgery 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of surgery 240:205213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Rossitto C, Costantini B, Gueli-Alletti S, Avenia N, Iodice R, Scambia G (2014) Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 21:447–453CrossRefPubMed Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Rossitto C, Costantini B, Gueli-Alletti S, Avenia N, Iodice R, Scambia G (2014) Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 21:447453CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tou S, Malik AI, Wexner SD, Nelson RL (2011) Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews:CD007886 Tou S, Malik AI, Wexner SD, Nelson RL (2011) Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews:CD007886
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamina M, Champagne BJ, Hoffman L, Ermlich MB, Delaney CP (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection. The British journal of surgery 98:1703–1712CrossRefPubMed Adamina M, Champagne BJ, Hoffman L, Ermlich MB, Delaney CP (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection. The British journal of surgery 98:17031712CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubner M, Hahnloser D, Hetzer F, Muller MK, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2007) A prospective randomized comparison of two instruments for dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical endoscopy 21:592–594CrossRefPubMed Hubner M, Hahnloser D, Hetzer F, Muller MK, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2007) A prospective randomized comparison of two instruments for dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical endoscopy 21:592594CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Garrone C, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Morino M (2009) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs. harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Diseases of the colon and rectum 52:657–661CrossRefPubMed Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Garrone C, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Morino M (2009) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs. harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Diseases of the colon and rectum 52:657661CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Morino M, Rimonda R, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Garrone C (2005) Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Annals of surgery 242:897–901, discussion 901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morino M, Rimonda R, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Garrone C (2005) Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Annals of surgery 242:897–901, discussion 901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J, Neto RB, Martinez C, Garriga J, Trias M (2005) Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surgical innovation 12:339–344PubMed Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J, Neto RB, Martinez C, Garriga J, Trias M (2005) Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surgical innovation 12:339344PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Trilling B, Riboud R, Abba J, Girard E, Faucheron JL (2016) Energy vessel sealing systems versus mechanical ligature of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. International journal of colorectal disease Trilling B, Riboud R, Abba J, Girard E, Faucheron JL (2016) Energy vessel sealing systems versus mechanical ligature of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. International journal of colorectal disease
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Waetjen LE, Parvataneni R, Varon S, Saberi NS, Jacoby VL, University of California Fibroid N (2015) Obstacles to Studying Emerging Technologies. Obstetrics and gynecology 126:391–395 Waetjen LE, Parvataneni R, Varon S, Saberi NS, Jacoby VL, University of California Fibroid N (2015) Obstacles to Studying Emerging Technologies. Obstetrics and gynecology 126:391395
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajan PV, Kramer DB, Kesselheim AS (2015) Medical device postapproval safety monitoring: where does the United States stand? Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 8:124–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rajan PV, Kramer DB, Kesselheim AS (2015) Medical device postapproval safety monitoring: where does the United States stand? Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 8:124131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Overbey DM, Townsend NT, Chapman BC, Bennett DT, Foley LS, Rau AS, Yi JA, Jones EL, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2015) Surgical Energy-Based Device Injuries and Fatalities Reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221:197–205 e191 Overbey DM, Townsend NT, Chapman BC, Bennett DT, Foley LS, Rau AS, Yi JA, Jones EL, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2015) Surgical Energy-Based Device Injuries and Fatalities Reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221:197205 e191
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2010) Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse. Annals of surgery 251:766–771CrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2010) Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse. Annals of surgery 251:766771CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery
verfasst von
Daniel C. Steinemann
Sebastian H. Lamm
Andreas Zerz
Publikationsdatum
25.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3217-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.