Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgery Today
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 1/2020

05.08.2019 | Original Article

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin for preventing venous thromboembolic events after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized-controlled trial (YCOG 1404)

verfasst von: Kazuya Nakagawa, Jun Watanabe, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Yusuke Suwa, Shinsuke Suzuki, Hirokazu Suwa, Masashi Momiyama, Atsushi Ishibe, Yusuke Saigusa, Takeharu Yamanaka, Chikara Kunisaki, Itaru Endo

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (LAC) in Japanese patients.

Methods

The subjects of this multicenter, open-label randomized-controlled trial were 121 patients who underwent LAC between September 2015 and May 2017. The patients were randomly allocated to receive intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) with enoxaparin (20 mg, twice daily), started 24–36 h after surgery and continued until discharge (Enoxaparin group; n = 61), or IPC alone (IPC group; n = 60). The primary endpoint was the incidence of VTE on day 28 after surgery. The safety outcome was the incidence of any bleeding during treatment and follow-up.

Results

The incidence of VTE on day 28 after surgery was 12.3% (7/57 patients) in the enoxaparin group and 11.9% (7/59 patients) in the IPC group ((p = 1.00). One of the 57 patients (1.8%) in the enoxaparin group and none in the IPC group experienced a bleeding event.

Conclusions

It may be unnecessary to give enoxaparin to all Japanese patients for the prevention of VTE after LAC.
The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number was UMIN000018633.
Literatur
1.
Donati MB. Cancer and thrombosis. Haemostasis. 1994;24:128–31.PubMed
2.
Ambrus JL, Ambrus CM, Mink IB, Pickren JW. Causes of death in cancer patients. J Med. 1975;6:61–4.PubMed
3.
Gezelius C, Eriksson A. Neoplastic disease in a medicolegal autopsy material. A retrospective study in northern Sweden. Z Rechtsmed. 1988;101:115–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
6.
Sakon M, Maehara Y, Yoshikawa H, Akaza H. Incidence of venous thromboembolism following major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective epidemiological study in Japan. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:581–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP, Pineo GF, Colwell CW, Anderson FA, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2001;119:132S–75S.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Mismetti P, Laporte S, Darmon JY, Buchmüller A, Decousus H. Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:913–30.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Collins R, Scrimgeour A, Yusuf S, Peto R. Reduction in fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis by perioperative administration of subcutaneous heparin: overview of results of randomized trials in general, orthopedic, and urologic surgery. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1162–73.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Wille-Jorgensen P, Rasmussen MS, Andersen BR, Borly L. Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;4:001217.
11.
Kerkez MD, Culafic DM, Mijac DD, Rankovic VI, Lekic NS, Stefanovic DZ. A study of pulmonary embolism after abdominal surgery in patients undergoing prophylaxis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:344–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Moneta GL, Bedford G, Beach K, Strandness DE. Duplex ultrasound assessment of venous diameters, peak velocities, and flow patterns. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8:286–91.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Nguyen NT, Cronan M, Braley S, Rivers R, Wolfe BM. Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic open gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:285–90.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Fayad C, Varela E, Konyalian V, Stamos MJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism compared with open surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1021–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Shapiro R, Vogel JD, Kiran RP. Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: an additional benefit of the minimally invasive approach? Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1496–502.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Cimminiello C, Prandoni P, Agnelli G, Di Minno G, Polo Friz H, Scaglione F, et al. Thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin and direct oral anticoagulants in major orthopedic surgery and acutely ill medical patients: a metaanalysis. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12:1291–305.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Nagata C, Tanabe H, Takakura S, Narui C, Saito M, Yanaihara N, et al. Randomized controlled trial of enoxaparin versus intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prevention in Japanese surgical patients with gynecologic malignancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41:1440–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hashimoto D, Nakagawa S, Umezaki N, Yamao T, Kitano Y, Yamamura K, et al. Efficacy and safety of postoperative anticoagulation prophylaxis with enoxaparin in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: a prospective trial and literature review. Pancreatology. 2017;17:464–70.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Dranitsaris G, Jelincic V, Choe Y. Meta-regression analysis to indirectly compare prophylaxis with dalteparin or enoxaparin in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolic events. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012;18:233–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Sakon M, Kobayashi T, Shimazui T. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in Japanese patients undergoing curative abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery: results from a multicenter, randomized, open-label study. Thromb Res. 2010;125:e65–70.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Yoshida N, Baba Y, Miyamoto Y, Iwatsuki M, Hiyoshi Y, Ishimoto T, et al. Prophylaxis of postoperative venous thromboembolism using enoxaparin after esophagectomy: a prospective observational study of effectiveness and safety. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2434–40.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Campbell DA Jr., Caprini JA. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg. 2010;251:344–50.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus JI, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e227S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep vein thrombosis (JCS 2009). Circ J. 2011;75:1258–81.CrossRef
25.
Zaghiyan KN, Sax HC, Miraflor E, Cossman D, Wagner W, Mirocha J, Gewertz B, Fleshner P, Cedars-Sinai DVT Study Group. Timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis and deep vein thrombosis in major colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264:632–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
ENOXACAN Study Group. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in elective cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized multicentre trial with venographic assessment. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1099–103.CrossRef
27.
McLeod RS, Geerts WH, Sniderman KW, Greenwood C, Gregoire RC, Taylor BM, et al. Subcutaneous heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of the canadian colorectal DVT prophylaxis trial: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Surg. 2001;233:438–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Simonneau G, Laporte S, Mismetti P, Derlon A, Samii K, Samama CM, et al. A randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of nadroparin 2850 IU (0 3 mL) vs enoxaparin 4000 IU (40 mg) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after colorectal surgery for cancer. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:1693–700.CrossRefPubMed
29.
White RH, Zhou H, Murin S, Harvey D. Effect of ethnicity and gender on the incidence of venous thromboembolism in a diverse population in California in 1996. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93:298–305.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zakai NA, McClure LA. Racial differences in venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:1877–82.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Rasmussen MS, Jørgensen LN, Wille-Jørgensen P. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;21:CD004318.
33.
Vedovati MC, Becattini C, Rondelli F, Boncompagni M, Camporese G, Balzarotti R, et al. A randomized study on 1-week versus 4-week prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2014;259:665–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Verheijen PM, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Clark DA, Clark AJ, Lumley JW. Prolonged use of thromboprophylaxis may not be necessary in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:755–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Cheung HY, Chung CC, Yau KK, Siu WT, Wong SK, Chiu E, et al. Risk of deep vein thrombosis following laparoscopic rectosigmoid cancer resection in Chinese patients. Asian J Surg. 2008;31:63–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Richardson WS, Apelgren K, Fanelli RD, Earle D. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in laparoscopy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2335–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107:I9–I16.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Baumgartner JM, McKenzie S, Block S, Costantini TW, Lowy AM. Prophylactic enoxaparin doses may be inadequate in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. J Surg Res. 2018;221:183–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Fuji T, Ochi T, Niwa S, Fujita S. Prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in Japanese patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with three dosage regimens of enoxaparin. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:442–51.CrossRefPubMed
40.
White RH, McGahan JP, Daschbach MM, Hartling RP. Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis using duplex ultrasound. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:297–304.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Abbitt PL. Real-time ultrasonography for the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. The wave of the future? Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1731–4.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Cogo A, Lensing AW, Wells P, Prandoni P, Buller HR. Noninvasive objective tests for the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Haemostasis. 1995;25:27–39.PubMed
43.
Guyatt GH, Eikelboom JW, Gould MK, Garcia DA, Crowther M, Murad MH, et al. Approach to outcome measurement in the prevention of thrombosis in surgical and medical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e185S–e194S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin for preventing venous thromboembolic events after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized-controlled trial (YCOG 1404)
verfasst von
Kazuya Nakagawa
Jun Watanabe
Mitsuyoshi Ota
Yusuke Suwa
Shinsuke Suzuki
Hirokazu Suwa
Masashi Momiyama
Atsushi Ishibe
Yusuke Saigusa
Takeharu Yamanaka
Chikara Kunisaki
Itaru Endo
Publikationsdatum
05.08.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01859-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Surgery Today 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article

Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives

Original Article

Current status of post-operative infections due to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria after digestive tract surgery in Japan: Japan Postoperative Infectious Complications Survey in 2015 (JPICS’15)

Review Article

Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer

Preface

Preface for 50th anniversary

Review Article

Current management strategies for visceral artery aneurysms: an overview

Review Article

Preoperative predictors of postoperative complications after gastric cancer resection

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.