Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2018

24.01.2018 | Original Article

Efficacy of Partial- Versus Full-Sling Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Head-to-Head Comparison

verfasst von: Kyeong-Tae Lee, Yeseul Eom, Goo-Hyun Mun, Sa Ik Bang, Byung-Joon Jeon, Jai-Kyong Pyon

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM), popularly used in tissue expander-based breast reconstruction, is applied either as a partial or full sling, but without any consensus regarding which method of application produces better outcomes. We aimed to compare the outcomes between two patient groups who underwent tissue expander-based breast reconstruction using these techniques.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for consecutive patients who underwent immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM between January 2013 and June 2016. They were categorized into two cohorts: cohort 1 included patients in whom ADM was applied using the partial-sling technique, insetting it obliquely after releasing the pectoralis major muscle from its costal origin, and cohort 2 included those who underwent a full-sling technique, insetting it transversely after releasing the muscle from its costal and lower sternal origin. Postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

We analysed 329 cases (167 in cohort 1 and 162 in cohort 2) with similar baseline characteristics in both cohorts. Reconstruction failure occurred in 2.4% of overall patients. The rates of each and overall acute complications did not differ significantly between the cohorts. Cohort 2 showed significantly lower rates of tissue expander displacement and malposition following the first-stage operation and rippling following the second-stage operation, differences that retained the influences in multivariate analyses. Higher aesthetic scores were obtained in cohort 2.

Conclusion

Using the full-sling ADM might reduce unintended migration of prostheses and enable proper tissue expansion, resulting in better overall outcomes without increasing morbidities.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, Lee G, Curtin C (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19:463–469PubMed Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, Lee G, Curtin C (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19:463–469PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Matros E (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:15–23CrossRefPubMed Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Matros E (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:15–23CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55:232–239CrossRefPubMed Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55:232–239CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH (2011) Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:403e–410eCrossRefPubMed Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH (2011) Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:403e–410eCrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, Moore DH, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ (2012) The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:901e–908eCrossRefPubMed Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, Moore DH, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ (2012) The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:901e–908eCrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Fine NA, Kim JY (2012) Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:750–758CrossRefPubMed Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Fine NA, Kim JY (2012) Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:750–758CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsberg CG, Kelly DA, Wood BC, Mastrangelo SL, DeFranzo AJ, Thompson JT, David LR, Marks MW (2014) Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 72:S116–S120CrossRefPubMed Forsberg CG, Kelly DA, Wood BC, Mastrangelo SL, DeFranzo AJ, Thompson JT, David LR, Marks MW (2014) Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 72:S116–S120CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Collis GN, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC, Perdikis G (2012) Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 68:425–428CrossRefPubMed Collis GN, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC, Perdikis G (2012) Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 68:425–428CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ganor O, Markarian MK, Tobias AM, Lee BT, Lin SJ, Mureau MA (2015) Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Aesthet Plast Surg 39:359–368CrossRef Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ganor O, Markarian MK, Tobias AM, Lee BT, Lin SJ, Mureau MA (2015) Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Aesthet Plast Surg 39:359–368CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chepla KJ, Dagget JR, Soltanian HT (2012) The partial AlloDerm sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:924–930CrossRefPubMed Chepla KJ, Dagget JR, Soltanian HT (2012) The partial AlloDerm sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:924–930CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sbitany H, Langstein HN (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in primary breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 31:30S–37SCrossRefPubMed Sbitany H, Langstein HN (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in primary breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 31:30S–37SCrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY (2014) An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:178–188CrossRefPubMed Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY (2014) An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:178–188CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudson DA, Adams KG, Adams S (2011) Tissue expansion: further attempts to improve results in breast reconstruction. Plast Surg Int 2011:952197PubMedPubMedCentral Hudson DA, Adams KG, Adams S (2011) Tissue expansion: further attempts to improve results in breast reconstruction. Plast Surg Int 2011:952197PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahabedian MY (2012) Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:44S–53SCrossRefPubMed Nahabedian MY (2012) Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:44S–53SCrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Baker JL Jr (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1119–1123 (Discussion 1124) CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Baker JL Jr (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1119–1123 (Discussion 1124) CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS (2008) A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:340–347CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS (2008) A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:340–347CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F (2005) The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:84–95PubMed Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F (2005) The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:84–95PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Roostaeian J, Sanchez I, Vardanian A, Herrera F, Galanis C, Da Lio A, Festekjian J, Crisera CA (2012) Comparison of immediate implant placement versus the staged tissue expander technique in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:909e–918eCrossRefPubMed Roostaeian J, Sanchez I, Vardanian A, Herrera F, Galanis C, Da Lio A, Festekjian J, Crisera CA (2012) Comparison of immediate implant placement versus the staged tissue expander technique in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:909e–918eCrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Esserman LJ, Foster RD (2016) Tissue expander reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 77:17–24CrossRefPubMed Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Esserman LJ, Foster RD (2016) Tissue expander reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 77:17–24CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:57S–66SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:57S–66SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1049–1058CrossRefPubMed Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1049–1058CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamboa-Bobadilla GM (2006) Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56:22–25CrossRefPubMed Gamboa-Bobadilla GM (2006) Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56:22–25CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E (2007) Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:373–381CrossRefPubMed Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E (2007) Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:373–381CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Qureshi AA, Broderick KP, Belz J, Funk S, Reaven N, Brandt KE, Tenenbaum MM, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL, Myckatyn TM (2016) Uneventful versus successful reconstruction and outcome pathways in implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:173e–183eCrossRefPubMed Qureshi AA, Broderick KP, Belz J, Funk S, Reaven N, Brandt KE, Tenenbaum MM, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL, Myckatyn TM (2016) Uneventful versus successful reconstruction and outcome pathways in implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:173e–183eCrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sbitany H, Serletti JM (2011) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:1162–1169CrossRefPubMed Sbitany H, Serletti JM (2011) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:1162–1169CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23:600–610CrossRefPubMed Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23:600–610CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang F, Peled AW, Chin R, Fowble B, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Esserman L, Foster R, Sbitany H (2016) The impact of radiation therapy, lymph node dissection, and hormonal therapy on outcomes of tissue expander-implant exchange in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1–9CrossRefPubMed Wang F, Peled AW, Chin R, Fowble B, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Esserman L, Foster R, Sbitany H (2016) The impact of radiation therapy, lymph node dissection, and hormonal therapy on outcomes of tissue expander-implant exchange in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1–9CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam TC, Hsieh F, Boyages J (2013) The effects of postmastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy on immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:511–518CrossRefPubMed Lam TC, Hsieh F, Boyages J (2013) The effects of postmastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy on immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:511–518CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy of Partial- Versus Full-Sling Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Head-to-Head Comparison
verfasst von
Kyeong-Tae Lee
Yeseul Eom
Goo-Hyun Mun
Sa Ik Bang
Byung-Joon Jeon
Jai-Kyong Pyon
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1084-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.