Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2008

01.10.2008

Efficient Whole-Body MRI Interpretation: Evaluation of a Dedicated Software Prototype

verfasst von: Patrick Asbach, Valer Canda, Kay-Geert A. Hermann, Lasse Krug, Horst K. Hahn, Bernd Hamm, Christian Klessen

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Sonderheft 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The study investigates the performance of a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation software with regard to diagnostic efficiency using quantitative and qualitative parameters. Forty-eight oncologic patients underwent whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). In a quantitative analysis, the times needed for interpretation of the CT and MRI datasets were measured. The MRI studies were read using a standard workstation and the whole-body MRI interpretation software, respectively. In the qualitative analysis, the numbers of metastases were separately recorded for 13 organ systems, again interpreting the MRI images on the standard workstation and with the dedicated software. Moreover, user friendliness and system usability were evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. Use of the whole-body MRI interpretation software significantly reduced the MRI interpretation time compared with the standard workstation. There was no significant difference between interpretation time of WB-CT and interpretation time of WB-MRI using the dedicated software. Comparison with WB-CT as the reference method demonstrated no significant difference between the whole-body MRI interpretation software prototype and the standard interpretation software in the number of metastases detected. In conclusion, the use of the dedicated whole-body reading software improves the interpretation process of WB-MRI studies with respect to time efficiency and system usability.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlemmer HP, Schafer J, Pfannenberg C, et al: Fast whole-body assessment of metastatic disease using a novel magnetic resonance imaging system: initial experiences. Invest Radiol 40:64–71, 2005PubMedCrossRef Schlemmer HP, Schafer J, Pfannenberg C, et al: Fast whole-body assessment of metastatic disease using a novel magnetic resonance imaging system: initial experiences. Invest Radiol 40:64–71, 2005PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenchel M, Scheule AM, Stauder NI, et al: Atherosclerotic disease: whole-body cardiovascular imaging with MR system with 32 receiver channels and total-body surface coil technology—initial experiences. Radiology 238:280–291, 2006PubMedCrossRef Fenchel M, Scheule AM, Stauder NI, et al: Atherosclerotic disease: whole-body cardiovascular imaging with MR system with 32 receiver channels and total-body surface coil technology—initial experiences. Radiology 238:280–291, 2006PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Klessen C, Asbach P, Hein PA, et al: Whole-body MR angiography: comparison of two protocols for contrast media injection. Rofo 178:484–490, 2006PubMed Klessen C, Asbach P, Hein PA, et al: Whole-body MR angiography: comparison of two protocols for contrast media injection. Rofo 178:484–490, 2006PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer H, Schoenberg SO, Nikolaou K, et al: Cardiovascular screening with parallel imaging techniques and a whole-body MR imager. Radiology 236:300–310, 2005PubMedCrossRef Kramer H, Schoenberg SO, Nikolaou K, et al: Cardiovascular screening with parallel imaging techniques and a whole-body MR imager. Radiology 236:300–310, 2005PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer JF, Schlemmer HP: Total-body MR-imaging in oncology. Eur Radiol 16:2000–2015, 2006PubMedCrossRef Schaefer JF, Schlemmer HP: Total-body MR-imaging in oncology. Eur Radiol 16:2000–2015, 2006PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt GP, Haug AR, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF: Whole-body MRI and PET-CT in the management of cancer patients. Eur Radiol 16:1216–1225, 2006PubMedCrossRef Schmidt GP, Haug AR, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF: Whole-body MRI and PET-CT in the management of cancer patients. Eur Radiol 16:1216–1225, 2006PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Althoff CE, Appel H, Rudwaleit M, et al: Whole-body MRI as a new screening tool for detecting axial and peripheral manifestations of spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:983–985, 2007PubMedCrossRef Althoff CE, Appel H, Rudwaleit M, et al: Whole-body MRI as a new screening tool for detecting axial and peripheral manifestations of spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:983–985, 2007PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, et al: Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients with metastases. Radiology 233:139–148, 2004PubMedCrossRef Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, et al: Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients with metastases. Radiology 233:139–148, 2004PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt GP, Schoenberg SO, Schmid R, et al: Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT. Eur Radiol 17:939–949, 2007PubMedCrossRef Schmidt GP, Schoenberg SO, Schmid R, et al: Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT. Eur Radiol 17:939–949, 2007PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller-Horvat C, Plathow C, Ludescher B, et al: Generating statements at whole-body imaging with a workflow-optimized software tool—first experiences with multireader analysis. Rofo 179:721–727, 2007PubMed Muller-Horvat C, Plathow C, Ludescher B, et al: Generating statements at whole-body imaging with a workflow-optimized software tool—first experiences with multireader analysis. Rofo 179:721–727, 2007PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Andriole KP, Morin RL, Arenson RL, et al: Addressing the coming radiology crisis—the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative. J Digit Imaging 17:235–243, 2004PubMedCrossRef Andriole KP, Morin RL, Arenson RL, et al: Addressing the coming radiology crisis—the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative. J Digit Imaging 17:235–243, 2004PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke J: System usability score (SUS). In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL Eds. Usability evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996 Brooke J: System usability score (SUS). In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL Eds. Usability evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Teistler M, Breiman RS, Lison T, et al: Simplifying the exploration of volumetric images, development of a 3D user interface for the radiologist’s workplace. J Digit Imaging (in press) 2008 (Mar 27,) Teistler M, Breiman RS, Lison T, et al: Simplifying the exploration of volumetric images, development of a 3D user interface for the radiologist’s workplace. J Digit Imaging (in press) 2008 (Mar 27,)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moise A, Atkins MS: Designing better radiology workstations. impact of two user interfaces on interpretation errors and user satisfaction. J Digit Imaging 18:109–115, 2007CrossRef Moise A, Atkins MS: Designing better radiology workstations. impact of two user interfaces on interpretation errors and user satisfaction. J Digit Imaging 18:109–115, 2007CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Efficient Whole-Body MRI Interpretation: Evaluation of a Dedicated Software Prototype
verfasst von
Patrick Asbach
Valer Canda
Kay-Geert A. Hermann
Lasse Krug
Horst K. Hahn
Bernd Hamm
Christian Klessen
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2008
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9107-2

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2008

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.