Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Kardiologe 5/2016

04.08.2016 | EKG | Konsensuspapier

Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. für „Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen“

Update 2016

verfasst von: Dr. S. Perings, N. Smetak, M. Kelm, U. Gremmler, H. Darius, J. Senges, T. Münzel, E. Giannitsis, H. Katus

Erschienen in: Die Kardiologie | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Auszug

Herausgegeben vom Vorstand der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. Bearbeitet im Auftrag der Kommission für klinische Kardiologie. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Perings S et al (2010) Konsensuspapier der Task Force „Brustschmerz-Ambulanz“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung. Kardiologe 4(3):208–213CrossRef Perings S et al (2010) Konsensuspapier der Task Force „Brustschmerz-Ambulanz“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung. Kardiologe 4(3):208–213CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kligfield P et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(10):1109–1127CrossRefPubMed Kligfield P et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(10):1109–1127CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassand JP et al (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 28(13):1598–1660CrossRefPubMed Bassand JP et al (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 28(13):1598–1660CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van de Werf F et al (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29(23):2909–2945CrossRefPubMed Van de Werf F et al (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29(23):2909–2945CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JL et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 116(7):e148–304CrossRefPubMed Anderson JL et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 116(7):e148–304CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruigomez A et al (2006) Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 23(2):167–174CrossRefPubMed Ruigomez A et al (2006) Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 23(2):167–174CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruigomez A et al (2009) Chest pain without established ischaemic heart disease in primary care patients: associated comorbidities and mortality. Br J Gen Pract 59(560):e78–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ruigomez A et al (2009) Chest pain without established ischaemic heart disease in primary care patients: associated comorbidities and mortality. Br J Gen Pract 59(560):e78–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz R, Rauch B (2003) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary heart disease. Issued by the executive committee of the German Society of Cardiology – Heart Circulation Research in cooperation with the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiac Diseases and the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Z Kardiol 92(6):501–521PubMed Dietz R, Rauch B (2003) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary heart disease. Issued by the executive committee of the German Society of Cardiology – Heart Circulation Research in cooperation with the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiac Diseases and the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Z Kardiol 92(6):501–521PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason JW et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(10):1128–1135CrossRefPubMed Mason JW et al (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(10):1128–1135CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Breuckmann F et al (2008) Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung für „Chest-Pain-Units“. Kardiologe 2(5):389–394CrossRef Breuckmann F et al (2008) Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung für „Chest-Pain-Units“. Kardiologe 2(5):389–394CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Surawicz B et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):976–981CrossRefPubMed Surawicz B et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):976–981CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rautaharju PM et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):982–991CrossRefPubMed Rautaharju PM et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):982–991CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock EW et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):992–1002CrossRefPubMed Hancock EW et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):992–1002CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner GS et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):1003–1011CrossRefPubMed Wagner GS et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(11):1003–1011CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller-Bardorff M et al (1999) Quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T: a complementary method to centralized laboratory testing. Clin Chem 45(7):1002–1008PubMed Muller-Bardorff M et al (1999) Quantitative bedside assay for cardiac troponin T: a complementary method to centralized laboratory testing. Clin Chem 45(7):1002–1008PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Apple FS (2009) A new season for cardiac troponin assays: it’s time to keep a scorecard. Clin Chem 55(7):1303–1306CrossRefPubMed Apple FS (2009) A new season for cardiac troponin assays: it’s time to keep a scorecard. Clin Chem 55(7):1303–1306CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas PS et al (2007) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(2):187–204CrossRefPubMed Douglas PS et al (2007) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(2):187–204CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein AE et al (2008) ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(21):e1–62CrossRefPubMed Epstein AE et al (2008) ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(21):e1–62CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Trappe HJ, Lollgen H (2000) Guidelines for ergometry. German Society of Cardiology – Heart and Cardiovascular Research. Z Kardiol 89(9):821–831CrossRefPubMed Trappe HJ, Lollgen H (2000) Guidelines for ergometry. German Society of Cardiology – Heart and Cardiovascular Research. Z Kardiol 89(9):821–831CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas PS et al (2008) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(11):1127–1147CrossRefPubMed Douglas PS et al (2008) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(11):1127–1147CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandoh T et al (2000) Fluvastatin suppresses atherosclerotic progression, mediated through its inhibitory effect on endothelial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and macrophage deposition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 35(1):136–144CrossRefPubMed Bandoh T et al (2000) Fluvastatin suppresses atherosclerotic progression, mediated through its inhibitory effect on endothelial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and macrophage deposition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 35(1):136–144CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendel RC et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497CrossRefPubMed Hendel RC et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Roffi M et al (2015) ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2015. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320 Roffi M et al (2015) ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2015. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Than M et al (2011) A 2‑h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377(9771):1077–1084CrossRefPubMed Than M et al (2011) A 2‑h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377(9771):1077–1084CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamm CW (2004) Guidelines: acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 1: ACS without persistent ST segment elevations. Z Kardiol 93(1):72–90CrossRefPubMed Hamm CW (2004) Guidelines: acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 1: ACS without persistent ST segment elevations. Z Kardiol 93(1):72–90CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Vafaie M et al (2015) Addition of copeptin improves diagnostic performance of point-of-care testing (POCT) for cardiac troponin T in early rule-out of myocardial infarction – A pilot study. Int J Cardiol 198:26–30CrossRefPubMed Vafaie M et al (2015) Addition of copeptin improves diagnostic performance of point-of-care testing (POCT) for cardiac troponin T in early rule-out of myocardial infarction – A pilot study. Int J Cardiol 198:26–30CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheike M, Nilsson S, Nylander E (2007) Exercise testing and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in primary care patients with chest pain of new onset. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(2):117–122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scheike M, Nilsson S, Nylander E (2007) Exercise testing and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in primary care patients with chest pain of new onset. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(2):117–122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebens K et al (2007) The role of nurses in a chest pain unit. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 6(4):265–272CrossRefPubMed Siebens K et al (2007) The role of nurses in a chest pain unit. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 6(4):265–272CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Kriterien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. für „Brustschmerz-Ambulanzen“
Update 2016
verfasst von
Dr. S. Perings
N. Smetak
M. Kelm
U. Gremmler
H. Darius
J. Senges
T. Münzel
E. Giannitsis
H. Katus
Publikationsdatum
04.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Schlagwörter
EKG
EKG
Erschienen in
Die Kardiologie / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2731-7129
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7137
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0074-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Der Kardiologe 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.