Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2017

22.06.2017 | Original Research

Elaboration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Qualitative Investigation of Goals and Strategies

verfasst von: Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Heather Zierhut

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

As the genetic counseling field evolves, a comprehensive model of practice is critical. The Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) consists of 5 tenets and 17 goals. Lacking in the REM, however, are well-articulated counselor strategies and behaviors. The purpose of the present study was to further elaborate and provide supporting evidence for the REM by identifying and mapping genetic counseling strategies to the REM goals. A secondary, qualitative analysis was conducted on data from two prior studies: 1) focus group results of genetic counseling outcomes (Redlinger-Grosse et al., Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2015); and 2) genetic counselors’ examples of successful and unsuccessful genetic counseling sessions (Geiser et al. 2009). Using directed content analysis, 337 unique strategies were extracted from focus group data. A Q-sort of the 337 strategies yielded 15 broader strategy domains that were then mapped to the successful and unsuccessful session examples. Differing prevalence of strategy domains identified in successful sessions versus the prevalence of domains identified as lacking in unsuccessful sessions provide further support for the REM goals. The most prevalent domains for successful sessions were Information Giving and Use Psychosocial Skills and Strategies; and for unsuccessful sessions, Information Giving and Establish Working Alliance. Identified strategies support the REM’s reciprocal nature, especially with regard to addressing patients’ informational and psychosocial needs. Patients’ contributions to success (or lack thereof) of sessions was also noted, supporting a REM tenet that individual characteristics and the counselor-patient relationship are central to processes and outcomes. The elaborated REM could be used as a framework for certain graduate curricular objectives, and REM components could also inform process and outcomes research studies to document and further characterize genetic counselor strategies.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, S. R., Berrier, K. L., Redlinger-Grosse, K., & Edwards, J.G. (2015). The genetic counselor-patient relationship following a life-limiting prenatal diagnosis: an exploration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model. Manuscript submitted for publication. Anderson, S. R., Berrier, K. L., Redlinger-Grosse, K., & Edwards, J.G. (2015). The genetic counselor-patient relationship following a life-limiting prenatal diagnosis: an exploration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Zurück zum Zitat Benkendorf, J. L., Prince, M. B., Rose, M. A., De Fina, A., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 199–207. doi:10.1002/ajmg.10012.CrossRefPubMed Benkendorf, J. L., Prince, M. B., Rose, M. A., De Fina, A., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 199–207. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​10012.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Berkenstadt, M., Shiloh, S., Barkai, G., Katznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1999). Perceived personal control: a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 82, 53–59.CrossRefPubMed Berkenstadt, M., Shiloh, S., Barkai, G., Katznelson, M., & Goldman, B. (1999). Perceived personal control: a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 82, 53–59.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.CrossRefPubMed Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Biesecker, B. B. (2003). Back to the future of genetic counseling: commentary on “Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era”. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 213–217.CrossRefPubMed Biesecker, B. B. (2003). Back to the future of genetic counseling: commentary on “Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era”. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 213–217.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Curtis, J. R., Wenrich, M. D., Carline, J. D., Shannon, S. E., Ambrozy, D. M., & Ramsey, P. G. (2001). Understanding physicians’ skills at providing end-of-life care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 41–49.PubMedPubMedCentral Curtis, J. R., Wenrich, M. D., Carline, J. D., Shannon, S. E., Ambrozy, D. M., & Ramsey, P. G. (2001). Understanding physicians’ skills at providing end-of-life care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 41–49.PubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Ellington, L., Baty, B. J., McDonald, J., Venne, V., Musters, A., Roter, D., et al. (2006). Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 179–189.CrossRefPubMed Ellington, L., Baty, B. J., McDonald, J., Venne, V., Musters, A., Roter, D., et al. (2006). Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 179–189.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Geiser, J., LeRoy, B., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D., & Berry, S. (2009). Identifying success in genetic counseling sessions: counselor perceptions of the goals of the reciprocal engagement model. University of Minnesota. Geiser, J., LeRoy, B., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D., & Berry, S. (2009). Identifying success in genetic counseling sessions: counselor perceptions of the goals of the reciprocal engagement model. University of Minnesota.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell, N., Statham, H., Murton, F., Green, J., & Richards, M. (1997). “Talking about chance”: the presentation of risk information during genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 269–286.CrossRefPubMed Hallowell, N., Statham, H., Murton, F., Green, J., & Richards, M. (1997). “Talking about chance”: the presentation of risk information during genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 269–286.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6.CrossRefPubMed Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-013-9647-6.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IX. Teaching and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 287–295.CrossRefPubMed Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IX. Teaching and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 287–295.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler, S. (2000). Closing thoughts on supervision. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 431–434.CrossRefPubMed Kessler, S. (2000). Closing thoughts on supervision. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 431–434.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lerner, B., Roberts, J. S., Shwartz, M., Roter, D. L., Green, R. C., & Clark, J. A. (2014). Distinct communication patterns during genetic counseling for late-onset Alzheimer’s risk assessment. Patient Education and Counseling, 94, 170–179. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.019.CrossRefPubMed Lerner, B., Roberts, J. S., Shwartz, M., Roter, D. L., Green, R. C., & Clark, J. A. (2014). Distinct communication patterns during genetic counseling for late-onset Alzheimer’s risk assessment. Patient Education and Counseling, 94, 170–179. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2013.​10.​019.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, L. J. (2002). Models of genetic counseling and their effects on multicultural genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 193–212. Lewis, L. J. (2002). Models of genetic counseling and their effects on multicultural genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 193–212.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Tucker, K., & Barratt, A. (2001). How do geneticists and genetic counselors counsel women from high-risk breast cancer families? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 185–199.CrossRef Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Tucker, K., & Barratt, A. (2001). How do geneticists and genetic counselors counsel women from high-risk breast cancer families? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 185–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macleod, R., Craufurd, D., & Booth, K. (2002). Patients’ perceptions of what makes genetic counselling effective: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 145–156. doi:10.1177/1359105302007002454 Macleod, R., Craufurd, D., & Booth, K. (2002). Patients’ perceptions of what makes genetic counselling effective: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 145–156. doi:10.​1177/​1359105302007002​454
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., Truesdell, S. E., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (1999). Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8, 191–216.CrossRef McCarthy Veach, P., Truesdell, S. E., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (1999). Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8, 191–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). Commentary on genetic counseling—a profession in search of itself. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 187–191.CrossRefPubMed McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). Commentary on genetic counseling—a profession in search of itself. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 187–191.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2003). Facilitating the genetic counseling process a practice manual. New York: Springer. McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2003). Facilitating the genetic counseling process a practice manual. New York: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9113-4.CrossRef McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-007-9113-4.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). Genetic counseling practice: advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). Genetic counseling practice: advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451. doi:10.1007/s10897-008-9173-0.CrossRefPubMed Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-008-9173-0.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Redlinger-Grosse, K. (2016). A different vantage point: commentary on 'Theories for Psychotherapeutic genetic counseling: fuzzy trace theory and cognitive behavior theory’. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Advance Online Publication: doi:10.1007/s10897-016-0024-0. Redlinger-Grosse, K. (2016). A different vantage point: commentary on 'Theories for Psychotherapeutic genetic counseling: fuzzy trace theory and cognitive behavior theory’. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Advance Online Publication: doi:10.​1007/​s10897-016-0024-0.
Zurück zum Zitat Redlinger-Grosse, K., Veach, P. M., Cohen, S., LeRoy, B. S., MacFarlane, I. M., & Zierhut, H. (2015). Defining our clinical practice: the identification of genetic counseling outcomes utilizing the reciprocal engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2. Redlinger-Grosse, K., Veach, P. M., Cohen, S., LeRoy, B. S., MacFarlane, I. M., & Zierhut, H. (2015). Defining our clinical practice: the identification of genetic counseling outcomes utilizing the reciprocal engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-015-9864-2.
Zurück zum Zitat Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRefPubMed Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Rieh, J. P., & Ray, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Rieh, J. P., & Ray, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Zurück zum Zitat Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The genetic counseling video project (GCVP): models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C, 209–220. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30094.CrossRef Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The genetic counseling video project (GCVP): models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C, 209–220. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​c.​30094.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 199–211.CrossRefPubMed Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 199–211.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Elaboration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Qualitative Investigation of Goals and Strategies
verfasst von
Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Patricia McCarthy Veach
Bonnie S. LeRoy
Heather Zierhut
Publikationsdatum
22.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0114-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.