Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 6/2017

22.03.2017 | Original Article

Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation

verfasst von: Andrew W. L. Dickinson, Michelle L. Zec, David R. Pichora, Brian J. Rasquinha, Randy E. Ellis

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

An electromagnetic (EM) surgical tracking system was developed for orthopedic navigation. The reportedly poor accuracy of point-based EM navigation was improved by using anatomical impressions, which were EM-tracked personalized templates. Lines, rather than points, were consistently used for calibration and error evaluation.

Methods

Technical accuracy was tested using models derived from CT scans of ten cadaver shoulders. Tracked impressions were first designed, calibrated, and tested using lines as fiducial objects. Next, tracked impressions were tested against EM point-based navigation and optical point-based navigation, in environments that were either relatively empty or that included surgical instruments. Finally, a tracked impression was tested on a cadaver forearm in a simulated fracture-repair task.

Results

Calibration of anatomical impressions to EM tracking was highly accurate, with mean fiducial localization errors in positions of 0.3 mm and in angles of \(0.6^\circ \). Technical accuracy on physical shoulder models was also highly accurate; in an EM field with surgical instruments, the mean of target registration errors in positions was 2.2 mm and in angles was \(3.7^\circ \). Preclinical accuracy in a cadaver forearm in positions was 0.4 mm and in angles was \(7.1^\circ \). The technical accuracy was significantly better than point-based navigation, whether by EM tracking or by optical tracking. The preclinical accuracy was comparable to that achieved by point-based optical navigation.

Conclusions

EM-tracked impressions—a hybrid of personalized templates and EM navigation—are a promising technology for orthopedic applications. The two technical contributions are the novel hybrid navigation and the consistent use of lines as fiducial objects, replacing traditional point-based computations. The accuracy improvement was attributed to the combination of physical surfaces and line directions in the processes of calibration and registration. The technical studies and preclinical trial suggest that EM-tracked impressions are an accurate, ergonomic innovation in image-guided orthopedic surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Amaral GJA, Dryden IL, Wood ATA (2007) Pivotal bootstrap methods for k-sample problems in directional statistics and shape analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 102(478):695–707CrossRef Amaral GJA, Dryden IL, Wood ATA (2007) Pivotal bootstrap methods for k-sample problems in directional statistics and shape analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 102(478):695–707CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 9(5):698–700CrossRefPubMed Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 9(5):698–700CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hummel JB, Bax MR, Figl ML, Kang Y, Maurer C Jr, Birkfellner W, Bergmann H, Shahidi R (2005) Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. Med Phys 32(7):2371–2379CrossRef Hummel JB, Bax MR, Figl ML, Kang Y, Maurer C Jr, Birkfellner W, Bergmann H, Shahidi R (2005) Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. Med Phys 32(7):2371–2379CrossRef
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunz M, Balaketheeswaran S, Ellis RE, Rudan JF (2015) The influence of osteophytes depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(6):717–726CrossRefPubMed Kunz M, Balaketheeswaran S, Ellis RE, Rudan JF (2015) The influence of osteophytes depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(6):717–726CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunz M, Xenoyannis GL, Rudan JF, Ellis RE (2010) Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 25(4):600–606CrossRefPubMed Kunz M, Xenoyannis GL, Rudan JF, Ellis RE (2010) Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 25(4):600–606CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Li JM, Bardana DD, Stewart AJ (2011) Augmented virtuality for arthroscopic knee surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv LNCS 6891:186–193 Li JM, Bardana DD, Stewart AJ (2011) Augmented virtuality for arthroscopic knee surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv LNCS 6891:186–193
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Pichora DR, Ellis RE, Akl SG, Fichtinger G (2015) Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(3):253–262 Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Pichora DR, Ellis RE, Akl SG, Fichtinger G (2015) Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(3):253–262
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma B, Ellis RE (2003) Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: laboratory validation and clinical experience. Med Image Anal 7(3):237–250CrossRefPubMed Ma B, Ellis RE (2003) Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: laboratory validation and clinical experience. Med Image Anal 7(3):237–250CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijkamp J, Schermers B, Schmitz S, de Jonge S, Kuhlmann K, van der Heijden F, Sonke JJ, Ruers T (2016) Comparing position and orientation accuracy of different electromagnetic sensors for tracking during interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(1):1–12. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1348-1 CrossRef Nijkamp J, Schermers B, Schmitz S, de Jonge S, Kuhlmann K, van der Heijden F, Sonke JJ, Ruers T (2016) Comparing position and orientation accuracy of different electromagnetic sensors for tracking during interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(1):1–12. doi:10.​1007/​s11548-015-1348-1 CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Venne G, Rasquinha BJ, Pichora D, Ellis RE, Bicknell R (2015) Comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery baseplate and screw placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(7):1112–1119CrossRefPubMed Venne G, Rasquinha BJ, Pichora D, Ellis RE, Bicknell R (2015) Comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery baseplate and screw placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(7):1112–1119CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wegner I, Teber D, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M, Meinzer HP, Huber J (2013) Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking in clinical routine using multiple or adjacent sensors. Int J Med Robot 9(3):268–273. doi:10.1002/rcs.1431 CrossRefPubMed Wegner I, Teber D, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M, Meinzer HP, Huber J (2013) Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking in clinical routine using multiple or adjacent sensors. Int J Med Robot 9(3):268–273. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1431 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation
verfasst von
Andrew W. L. Dickinson
Michelle L. Zec
David R. Pichora
Brian J. Rasquinha
Randy E. Ellis
Publikationsdatum
22.03.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1563-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.