nach oben

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Erschienen in:

05.02.2018 | Editorial

Electronic Health Records: a “Quadruple Win,” a “Quadruple Failure,” or Simply Time for a Reboot?

verfasst von: Michael Hochman, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Just a decade ago, when paper charts were commonplace in the USA, it seemed that electronic health records (EHRs) were destined to transform the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery, as well as the care experience for patients and clinicians. Few would deny that old fashion paper charts can be awkward to navigate, burdensome to read, poorly amenable for health information exchange, and inadequate for supporting systematic quality improvement. The sentiment that EHRs could solve these problems was pervasive, and many experts predicted that widespread EHR implementation would save billions.1 …

Hillestad R, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff 2005;24(5):1103–1117.CrossRef

Furukawa MF, et al. Despite substantial progress in EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. Health Aff. 2014:10–1377.

Sawchuk M, Linville M, Cornish N, Pollock A, Lubin I, Gagnon M, Stinn J. The Essential Role of Laboratory Professionals: Ensuring the Safety and Effectiveness of Laboratory Data in Electronic Health Record Systems. Atlanta, GA: Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/labhit/paper/Laboratory_Data_in_EHRs_2014.pdf

Bowman S. Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems on Information Integrity. Quality and safety implications. 2013;2013:10.

Isaac T, Weissman JS, Davis RB, et al. Overrides of medication alerts in ambulatory care. Arch Intern Med 2009;169: 305–311.CrossRefPubMed

Q3 2014 Black Book EHR Loyalty survey. Available at: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/09/prweb12182208.htm

Jones SS, et al. Unraveling the IT productivity paradox—lessons for health care. N Engl J Med 2012;366(24): 2243–2245.CrossRefPubMed

Wachter R. The digital doctor. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.

Sinsky C, et al. Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 SpecialtiesAllocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice. Ann Intern Med 2016;165(11): 753–760.CrossRefPubMed

10.

U.S. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Report to Congress: Update On The Adoption Of Health Information Technology And Related Efforts To Facilitate The Electronic Use And Exchange Of Health Information; 2016.

11.

Friedberg MW, et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Rand Corporation; 2013.

12.

Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014;12(6): 573–576.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Street RL Jr, Liu L, Farber NJ, Chen Y, Calvitti A, Weibel N, Gabuzda MT, Bell K, Gray B, Rick S, Ashfaq S, Agha Z. Keystrokes, Mouse Clicks, and Gazing at the Computer: How Physician Interaction with the EHR Affects Patient Participation. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4228-2

14.

Farber NJ, et al. EHR use and patient satisfaction: What we learned. J Fam Pract 2015;64(11): 687–694.PubMed

15.

Gellert GA, Ramirez R, Webster SL. The rise of the medical scribe industry: implications for the advancement of electronic health records. JAMA 2015;313(13): 1315–1316.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Electronic Health Records: a “Quadruple Win,” a “Quadruple Failure,” or Simply Time for a Reboot?
verfasst von: Michael Hochman, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum: 05.02.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4337-6

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Electronic Health Records: a “Quadruple Win,” a “Quadruple Failure,” or Simply Time for a Reboot?

Excerpt

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Drei Mythen bei der Antibiotikatherapie

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

General Internists in Pursuit of Diagnostic Excellence in Primary Care: a #ProudtobeGIM Thread That Unites Us All

The Influence of Financial Strain on Health Decision-Making

Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis C Infection in Primary Care Settings

Enhancing Resident Well-being: Illuminating the Path Forward

Twelve Lessons Learned for Effective Research Partnerships Between Patients, Caregivers, Clinicians, Academic Researchers, and Other Stakeholders

Supply of Healthcare Providers in Relation to County Socioeconomic and Health Status

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Drei Mythen bei der Antibiotikatherapie

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Update Innere Medizin