Zum Inhalt

Elucidate biomarkers and the molecular pathways associated with genetic variants that contribute to the etiology of Parkinson’s disease

  • Open Access
  • 30.09.2025
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Genetic variants can affect signaling pathways that are important in the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Comprehending their relationship is crucial for the development of diagnostic instruments and preventative drugs for PD. We thoroughly analyzed data from 68 genome-wide association studies to uncover significant genetic variations and clarify the molecular pathways underlying the etiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD) resulting from genetic variants. Six common biomarkers linked to PD were found in all 68 investigations: SNCA, TMEM175, BST1, RIT2, LRRK2, and MCCC1. SNCA (\(\uparrow\)rs5019538 and \(\uparrow\)rs356182), LRRK2 (\(\uparrow\)rs34637584 and \(\uparrow\)rs76904798), and SH3GL2 (\(\uparrow\)rs10756907 and \(\downarrow\)rs13294100) were the main biomarkers associated with PD. The clinical traits of PD, such as age at onset, cognitive progression, motor progression, composite progression, tremor dominant, and postural instability gait difficulty, have been found to be underpinned by additional biomarkers, including APOE, NTRK2, SLCO1B3, SLC28A3, AQP10, SNCAIP, ANO2, CADM1, PTPRD, GPR32, GPR321, SQOR, SULT1C2, GABRG2, CYP4Z1, CDH13, and FANCF. Significant evidence was found linking genetic variants linked to an increased risk of PD to reduced dopamine production, receptor recycling, oxidoreductase activity, and increased amyloid-beta accumulation. Considerable evidence links genetic variations with a lower risk of PD due to improved synaptic vesicle signaling, neuron projection development, controlled histone methylation, and excitatory postsynaptic potential. Additionally, we found MYT1L and hsa-miR-20a-5p, which are essential for understanding the genetic variations linked to PD. These findings provide a solid underpinning for future therapeutic approaches aimed at PD, with a focus on the genetic variants and processes connected to the illness.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02897-7.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurological disorder associated with aging. Its hallmark characteristics are the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons and the presence of Lewy bodies in the substantia nigra [18]. PD is characterized by symptoms such as resting tremors, postural instability, bradykinesia, and rigidity. The clinical presentation encompasses non-motor symptoms such as cognitive decline, hyposmia, sleep difficulty, depression, and autonomic dysfunction [8]. These symptoms worsen over time, impairing the patient’s ability to move and overall well-being. The number of PD cases tends to increase in the next few decades, resulting in a significant burden on health systems [18]. Nevertheless, the precise etiology of PD remains uncertain, but genetic factors, the aging process, and environmental factors are pivotal in the development of PD [40].
Over the last decade, around 20 genes have been linked to PD, or parkinsonism, in familial cases [7]. Although detrimental mutations in genes are crucial in the development of PD, only a small number of patients actually possess these mutations [52]. With the development of technology, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) can identify common variations with a small effect size, which have been found to significantly influence the genetic predisposition to PD. Over 300 prevalent variations (e.g., SNCA, LRRK2, BST1, GCH1, VPS13C, TMEM175, and MAPT) have been linked to age at onset, progression, and the risk of sporadic PD by GWASs [6, 21, 37, 58]. Although there have been extensive collaborative efforts involving multiple cohorts, the currently identified genetic variations can only account for 22–36% of the heritability of PD in the population of European ancestry [58]. Genetic variations have increased the challenge of finding approaches that can accurately identify, treat, and prevent this condition. Although numerous molecular pathways underlying the pathogenesis of PD associated with these variations have been identified, such as endocytosis, lysosomal function, and mitochondrial function, these molecular pathways seem insufficient to describe the precise effects of genetic variations on PD etiology [45, 58]. Thus, it is imperative to elucidate the precise molecular mechanisms underlying PD pathogenesis associated with genetic variations. Our hypothesis proposes that genetic variations in key genes may impact the biological mechanisms associated with PD. These genetic variations have the capacity to impact signaling pathways that play significant roles in the pathogenesis of PD. Understanding the link between them plays the most important role in the development of diagnostic tools and preventive therapies for PD. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the key genetic variations and their corresponding biological pathways that contribute to the etiology of PD using GWAS data from a total of 68 studies.

Materials and methods

Determination of putative genetic variants implicated in parkinson’s disease pathogenesis

The present study utilized data on “Parkinson Disease” obtained from the GWAS database (ID: MONDO_0005180) to investigate the potential of genetic variations as biomarkers for predicting and guiding therapy responses in individuals diagnosed with PD. The data was obtained on November 14, 2023. The dataset consists of 561 different genetic variations and risk alleles that were collected from a total of 71 investigations. It includes three symptoms (Parkinson disease, Parkinson’s disease, and paralysis agitans), 29 characteristics (such as Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson disease and Lewy body pathology, Parkinson’s disease (familial), etc.), and two sub-characteristics (secondary Parkinson disease and young adult-onset Parkinsonism). To ensure disease specificity, our analysis exclusively focused on genetic variants associated with PD, excluding entries linked solely to Lewy body pathology or other neurological conditions. In this study, the first stage was excluding a specific number of gene and beta data items that had missing gene (n = 34) and beta (n = 312) indicators in the specified “mapped genes” and “beta” tabs. We excluded records with missing gene annotations or beta values to ensure data quality and consistency. Although gene inference and beta approximation from odds ratios are possible, these approaches were not considered in this study to avoid potential inaccuracies due to inconsistent annotations and heterogeneous data sources. Afterwards, 8 records were excluded from the study because they had unclear variant and risk allele information. In conclusion, a grand total of 232 records were chosen for further processing (Supplementary Table S1). In order to study the molecular mechanisms behind the development of Parkinson’s disease associated with genetic variations, we specifically selected records that showed the highest beta value and the lowest p-values in 68 studies after cleaning data.

Sensitivity analysis

To evaluate the impact of excluding 312 records with missing beta values, a sensitivity analysis was conducted. Beta values for a subset of excluded records were estimated using odds ratios (when available) or mean beta values from similar SNPs in the dataset. Re-analysis of hub genes and pathways with these imputed values showed no significant changes in the prioritization of SNCA, LRRK2, SH3GL2, TMEM175, BST1, RIT2, or MCCC1, nor in the enrichment of key pathways (e.g., synaptic vesicle endocytosis, dopamine secretion), confirming the robustness of our findings.

Determining plausible biological pathways linking genetic variants to Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis

After identifying the potential genetic variants, we proceeded to carry out the enrichment analysis. The pathway analysis was performed using the CytoscapeClueGO plug-in (version 2.5.8). The KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways databases were selected in order to obtain a complete compilation of signaling pathways. The enrichment analysis was conducted using the two-sided hypergeometric test, using a Bonferroni step-down adjustment. The terms demonstrated a correlation with each other, as evidenced by a κ score of 0.4. The ClueGO plug-in enables the incorporation of Gene Ontology (GO) terminology and KEGG/BioCarta pathways [4]. This plug-in enables the viewing of biochemical pathways and gene ontologies related to the genetic variants under investigation. Furthermore, it allows for the assessment of functional annotations by comparing them between two clusters. The present study employed a plug-in tool to clarify the molecular pathways that are associated with the genetic changes under research and are linked to PD. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed using the STRING v12.0 database, and further modifications were made using Cytoscape v3.9.1. The assessment was performed by examining physical interactions that displayed a significant level of certainty, indicated by a physical score over 0.4 in the STRING database. The Cytoscape plug-in, CytoHubba, was employed to extract a hub network. The creation of this network involved combining subnetworks formed by the use of degree, closeness, and betweenness techniques, employing the technique of intersectional merging. The Venn diagram tool was used to determine the proteins that are shared throughout the subnetworks, including the top 10 nodes, which were ranked using degree, closeness, and betweenness methods [12]. To visualize the candidate genes at GWAS loci, we submitted the putative genes into the PD GWAS Locus Browser (https://pdgenetics.shinyapps.io/GWASBrowser/).
The identification of proteoforms resulting from post-translational modifications was performed by leveraging the UniProt database after conducting PPI analysis [79]. The biomarkers were categorized using the Panther classification system [80]. The expression of hub proteins in brain tissues was assessed using the Human Protein Atlas, accessible at the online address: https://www.proteinatlas.org/. The ChIP-X Enrichment Analysis Version 3 (CHEA3) was employed to identify the transcription factors that may be accountable for the identified genomic alterations [42]. The present algorithm employs data acquired from the ENCODE and ReMap GTEx datasets to detect transcription factors [43]. The creation of the integrated regulatory network was carried out using the software application Cytoscape. The approach entailed the selection of the top 10 transcription factors, which were chosen based on their average rank score. Later on, the MicroRNA Enrichment Turned Network (MIENTURNET) was employed to generate and analyze networks that depict the relationships between microRNA and its target biomarkers [50]. We performed microRNA-target interaction analysis using the MIENTURNET tool, with 310 curated variant-associated genes as input. Enrichment analysis was conducted using KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways databases, applying a significance threshold of p < 0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction. miRNAs were identified based on its significant enrichment in PD-relevant pathways, a minimum interaction score defined by MIENTURNET defaults, and further validated through brain-specific expression profiles from the Human Protein Atlas and supportive literature evidence. The functional enrichment analysis employed the KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathway databases in combination with the disease ontology database. A significance level of 0.05 was established in order to identify the functional annotations that exhibited significant enrichment throughout the whole gene group in the input set. The P-values underwent correction using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach [51]. The study utilized the R programming language version 4.0.2 for performing general data transformations and groupings. The activities were completed using the tidyverse package collection (version 1.3.2). The charts were created using the R packages ggplot2 v3.4.0, ggrepel v0.9.3, and ggpubr v0.5.0. The figure panels were created using the online platform BioRender.com.

Results

This study used data from 68 studies (after cleaning data) about genetic variants implicated in the pathogenesis of PD. A total of 542 variant and risk alleles were located across all chromosomes, especially chromosomes 4 and 17. As shown in Fig. 1AB, SNCA and TMEM175 located in chromosome number 4 showed high frequencies and traits (e.g., age at onset, cognitive progression, motor progression, composite progression, and tremor dominant and postural instability gait difficulty, etc.). The majority of these genes included various variant and risk alleles, which exert doubled nature (increase (\(\uparrow\)) or decrease (\(\downarrow\)) risk of PD). Most of these genes exert binding (21.6%) and catalytic activities (18.0%) (Fig. 1C). After the cleaning process, there were 310 genetic variations, including 167 with a higher risk of PD and 143 with a lower risk of PD (Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, there were 14, 12, and 16 genetic variations associated with the cognitive, motor, and composite progression of PD (Fig. 1D). There was significant evidence of impaired synaptic function, vesicle-mediated transport, and neuron projection associated with variant and risk alleles of PD (Fig. 1E).
Fig. 1
Genetic variants associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD) etiology. Manhattan map of the genome-wide loci linked to Parkinson’s disease (PD) (A). Common genetic variants and traits associated with PD etiology (B). Genetic variation classification (C) and chosen genetic variants linked to PD for further examination (D). Biological processes (PP) and cellular components (CC) are included in the top enriched analysis for genetic variants linked to PD (167 biomarkers for high risk and 143 biomarkers for low risk) (E). The GWAS database’s biomarker frequencies are used to calculate the score. Transcription regulator activity (TRA), transporter activity (TA), molecular function regulator activity (MFA), and molecular transducer activity (MTA) Others, such as molecular adaptor activity, ATP-dependent activity, antioxidant activity, and structural molecule activity. +++: Age at onset, Parkinson disease, and Parkinson disease progression measurement; ++: Age at onset and Parkinson disease; +: Parkinson disease. Decrease (\(\downarrow\)): a decreased likelihood of PD (a negative beta value); Increase (\(\uparrow\)): an increased likelihood of PD (a positive beta value)
Bild vergrößern
Three hub genes were identified after network topological analysis (Fig. 2A–D), including SNCA (\(\uparrow\)rs5019538 and \(\uparrow\)rs356182)(LRRK2 (\(\uparrow\)rs34637584 and \(\uparrow\)rs76904798), and SH3GL2 (\(\uparrow\)rs10756907 and \(\downarrow\)rs13294100). It has been well known that SNCA and LRRK2 are the prevalent genes underlying PD etiology. So, this study only analyzed the expression of SH3GL2. As shown in Fig. 3A–B, the expression of SH3GL2 was mostly in the brain, especially in the cerebral cortex. SH3GL2 is also found in the clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membrane, glutamatergic synapse, and presynapse (Fig. 3C). SH3GL2 was found to be a part of cluster 2 neurons – nucleosome; SH3GL2 showed high correlations with H2B clustered histone 15 (r = 0.874, cluster 34) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 9 (r = 0.856, cluster 37) (Fig. 3D). We also found SH3GL2 interacted with other enzymes (SYNJ1, CBL, PTPN23, and ITCH), transporters (LRRK2, EGRR, and DNM2), and other proteins in the brain (Fig. 3E–F). There was substantial evidence of impaired dopamine secretion, receptor recycling, and oxidoreductase activity and increased amyloid-beta formation associated with genetic variations with a higher risk of PD (Fig. 3G). Significant evidence indicated improved synaptic vesicle pathway, neuron projection development, and regulated histone methylation and excitatory postsynaptic potential related to genetic variants that carry a lower risk of PD (Fig. 4A–C).
Fig. 2
Topological analysis and key gene loci associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD). (A) Network topological measures including betweenness, closeness, and degree centrality used to identify hub genetic variants in PD (BD) Key loci identified by the PD GWAS Locus Browser: (B) SNCA, (C) LRRK2, and (D) SH3GL2, highlighting important variant positions related to PD risk
Bild vergrößern Bild vergrößern
Fig. 3
Expression and functional network of SH3GL2 in Parkinson’s disease. (AB) 3D-structure of SH3GL2 and expression distribution of SH3GL2: (A) in HEK293 cell line, (B) across different brain regions, and within neuronal compartments including clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membrane, glutamatergic synapse, and presynapse (Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org). The nTPM (transcripts per million) value denotes the number of transcripts detected for the SH3GL2 gene. 3D-structure of SH3HL2 was retrieved from the AlphaFold web tool (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/entry/Q8IZ09). (C) Correlation analysis showing SH3GL2 association with H2B clustered histone 15 and mitogen-activated protein kinase 9 within neuronal clusters (obtained from Uniprot (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q99962/entry). (DF) Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of SH3GL2 with enzymes (SYNJ1, CBL, PTPN23, ITCH) and transporters (LRRK2, EGRR, DNM2) in the brain (G) Post-translational modifications of NCAM1 linked to PD pathophysiology
Bild vergrößern
Fig. 4
Protein-protein interaction enrichment and genetic variation analyses in Parkinson’s disease. (AC) PPI enrichment analysis of genetic variants associated with PD risk: (A) 167 high-risk biomarkers, (B) 143 low-risk biomarkers, and (C) combined set of 310 high- and low-risk biomarkers, demonstrating molecular pathways linked to PD pathogenesis. In the networks, nodes represent genes or pathways, edges represent functional associations or shared interactions, and arrows indicate directional relationships between genes and pathways
Bild vergrößern Bild vergrößern
Next, we further analyzed the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of the PD subgroup, including age at onset, cognitive progression, motor progression, composite progression, and tremor dominant and postural instability gait difficulty. Genetic variations (SNCA (\(\uparrow\)rs356203), AAK1 (\(\downarrow\)rs7577851), OCA2 (\(\downarrow\)rs17565841), GABRG3 (\(\downarrow\)rs17565841), and ATF6 (\(\downarrow\)rs10918270)) associated with age at onset of PD were found to be related to SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) complex assembly, ly-tyrosine transmembrane transporter activity, recruitment of AP-2 complex and clathrin, GABAA receptors, and ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6)-mediated unfolded protein response (Fig. 5A). In terms of cognitive progression, genetic variations (APOE (\(\downarrow\)rs429358), (NTRK2 (\(\downarrow\)rs148603475), SLCO1B3 (SLC28A3 (\(\downarrow\)rs148603475)) were related to negative regulation of amyloid beta formation and transport of vitamins, nucleosides, and related molecules (Fig. 5B). As shown in Fig. 5C, genetic variations (AQP10 (\(\downarrow\)rs35950207), SNCAIP (\(\uparrow\)rs5870994), ANO2 (\(\downarrow\)rs74709761), CADM1 (\(\uparrow\)rs4436579), and PTPRD (\(\uparrow\)rs7870456)) were underlying the motor progression of PD via altering aquaporins that passively transport urea out of cells, binding to alpha-synuclein and Ca2+, Necl-1:Necl-2 trans heterodimer interaction, and synaptic adhesion (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, we found genetic variations (APOE (\(\uparrow\)rs429358), GPR32 (\(\uparrow\)rs4802739), GPR321 (\(\uparrow\)rs4802739), SNCAIP (\(\uparrow\)rs17367669), SQOR (\(\uparrow\)rsrs17554587), and SULT1C2 (\(\uparrow\)rs13424530)) underlying the composite progression of PD by altering complement receptor activity, lipoprotein particle clearance, binding alpha synuclein, SQR (sulfide quinone oxidoreductase), oxidizing sulfide to bound persulfide, and cytosolic sulfonation (Fig. 5E). On the other hand, we also found genetic variations (GABRG2 (\(\uparrow\)rs11949046), CYP4Z1 (\(\uparrow\)rs116504637), CDH13 (\(\downarrow\)rs13330839), FANCF (\(\downarrow\)rs55971529)) were involved in the pathogenesis of tremor dominant and postural instability gait difficulty by altering low-density lipoprotein particle-mediated signaling, cellular response to histamine, lauric acid metabolic process, and FANCD2 deubiquitination (Fig. 5F).
Fig. 5
Putative genes and protein-protein interaction (PPI) involved in clinical feature of Parkinson’ disease (PD). PPI enrichment analysis of putative genes involved in age at onset of PD (A), PD-associated cognitive impairment (B), Progression of motor symptoms in PD (C), Progression of composite symptoms in PD (D), and tremor dominant and postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD) phenotypes of PD (E). In the networks, nodes represent genes or pathways, edges represent functional associations or shared interactions, dashed lines indicate functional similarity, and arrows indicate directional relationships between genes and pathways
Bild vergrößern Bild vergrößern Bild vergrößern
Most miRNAs are found in the central nervous system, especially during brain development [46]. Dysregulation of miRNA transcript expression has been observed in various neurodegenerative diseases, including PD [75]. We performed microRNA–target interaction analysis using the MIENTURNET tool, with 310 curated variant-associated genes as input. Enrichment was assessed against KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways databases, applying a significance threshold of p < 0.05 after Benjamini–Hochberg correction. We identified three candidate miRNAs (hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-17-5p, and hsa-miR-20a-5p); however, only hsa-miR-20a-5p showed significant enrichment (false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.0394) in PD-relevant pathways. Specifically, hsa-miR-20a-5p was associated with inositol phosphate metabolism, adhesion junction, phosphatidylinositol signaling, and Th17 cell differentiation (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Table S3). We also identified the transcription factors underlying the pathogenesis of PD associated with genetic variations. As shown in Fig. 6B, MYT1L (myelin transcription factor 1 like) was the predominant transcription factor (the first ranking based on mean-rank) among the top 10 transcription factors. The expression of MYT1L was found in the SH-SY5Y cell line and across the brain, especially the cerebral cortex.
Fig. 6
Networks of microRNAs (A) and transcription factors (B) linked to genetic variants implicated in the etiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Using 310 genetic variants associated with PD, networks of miRNAs and transcription factors were evaluated
Bild vergrößern

Effect size analysis of genetic variants in Parkinson’s disease

To address the contribution of effect sizes to biomarker identification, we analyzed the beta values of the 232 genetic variants associated with PD and related traits from 68 GWAS studies (Supplementary Table S1). Beta values, representing the change in PD risk or trait progression per risk allele, were categorized by effect direction: 125 variants were risk-increasing (mean beta = 0.245, SD = 0.346, range = 0.0529–2.4289), and 107 were risk-decreasing (mean beta = − 0.209, SD = 0.231, range = − 2.84 to − 0.0529). These statistics highlight the variability in effect sizes, with risk-increasing variants showing larger magnitudes on average, driven by outliers such as LRRK2 (rs34637584, beta = 2.4289, p = 4e-82) and GBA1 (rs421016, beta = 1.979, p = 1e-14). To illustrate the distribution of effect sizes, box plots were generated for risk-increasing and risk-decreasing variants across traits (Supplementary Fig. S1). These plots highlight the variability in beta values and emphasize variants with |beta| >0.3, particularly for LRRK2, GBA1, and SNCA, which are critical for PD pathogenesis.

Trait-Specific effect sizes

Variants were grouped by clinical traits to assess their impact on PD pathogenesis, including PD risk, age at onset, motor progression, cognitive progression, composite progression, motor subtype, and mortality. PD Risk (177 variants): The largest effect sizes were observed for LRRK2 (rs34637584, beta = 2.4289), GBA1 (rs421016, beta = 1.979), and ASS1P14/SYT10 (rs138895122, beta = 0.6116), indicating strong contributions to PD susceptibility. SNCA variants (e.g., rs356182, beta = −0.343; rs5019538, beta = −0.1565) and TMEM175 (rs34311866, beta = 0.2425) also showed moderate to large effects, aligning with their roles as hub genes in Lewy body formation and lysosomal function, respectively. Age at Onset (6 variants): OCA2/GABRG3 (rs17565841, beta = −2.84, p = 3e-6) and QSER1/PRRG4 (rs10767971, beta = 3.24, p = 5e-7) had the largest effects, associated with earlier and later disease onset, respectively. SNCA (rs356203, beta = 1.4337) and TMEM175 (rs34311866, beta = −0.613) further influence onset timing. Motor Progression (9 variants): ANO2 (rs74709761, beta = −0.41) and GPR19 (rs12813102, beta = 0.43) exhibited significant effects, reflecting their roles in motor symptom progression via synaptic and signaling pathways. Cognitive Progression (9 variants): SLCO1B3 (rs143371462, beta = −0.64) and APOE (rs429358, beta = −0.38) showed substantial effects, consistent with their involvement in cognitive decline and amyloid-beta pathology. Composite Progression (8 variants): FAM184A (rs79987229, beta = 0.85) and SQOR (rs17554587, beta = 0.85) had the largest effects, linked to inflammation and oxidative stress pathways. Motor Subtype (Tremor vs. PIGD, 7 variants): FANCF (rs55971529, beta = −1.08) and TPI1P1 (rs988295487, beta = −0.84) were notable for influencing motor phenotypes through DNA repair and metabolic pathways. Mortality (1 variant): RPL3/PDGFB (rs12628329, beta = 1.79) significantly affected survival outcomes.

Integration with hub genes and pathways

High-effect-size variants were mapped to hub genes identified in our network analysis. LRRK2 (rs34637584, beta = 2.4289) and GBA1 (rs421016-G, beta = 1.979) showed the largest effects, reinforcing their roles in autophagy and lysosomal dysfunction. SNCA variants (e.g., rs356203, beta = 1.4337) underscored its centrality in Lewy body pathology. TMEM175 (rs34311866-C, beta = −0.613) and SH3GL2 (rs10756907, beta = −0.0926) aligned with lysosomal and synaptic vesicle pathways, respectively. BST1 (rs4698412, beta = 0.1035) and RIT2 (rs12456492, beta = −0.0983) showed moderate effects, consistent with their roles in neuroinflammation and dopamine signaling. MCCC1 (rs10513789, beta = 0.173) was linked to oxidative stress pathways. These findings confirm that variants with large effect sizes correspond to biologically relevant pathways, enhancing the reliability of our biomarker prioritization.

Discussion

This study further analyzed the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of PD associated with genetic variations. We observed three hub genes (SNCA, LRRK2, and SH3GL2) that carry different variants underlying the pathogenesis of PD. Other biomarkers (APOE, NTRK2, SLCO1B3, SLC28A3, AQP10, SNCAIP, ANO2, CADM1, PTPRD, GPR32, GPR321, SQOR, SULT1C2, GABRG2, CYP4Z1, CDH13, and FANCF) were also related to the clinical characteristics of PD (e.g., cognition, motor, age at onset, etc.). There was significant evidence of altered synaptic function and neuron projection development associated with the studied genetic variations.

Important genetic variations implicated in the pathogenesis of PD

SCNA (alpha synuclein) and LRRK2 (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2) are well-known biomarkers underlying the etiology of PD. SNCA is responsible for encoding the alpha-synuclein protein, which serves as the primary constituent of Lewy bodies (LBs) [73]. The abnormal accumulation of alpha-synuclein plays a critical role in the molecular development of PD, as it results in the production of LBs and other toxic aggregates [24]. Elevated alpha-synuclein production is associated with increased severity in both familiar and sporadic PD patients as a result of the SNCA mutation [34, 66]. Another type of SNCA, SNCAIP (alpha-synuclein-interacting protein) gene, is also a well-known factor in PD. A genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of 12 PD patients and 12 controls found the expression of SNCAIP (alpha-synuclein-interacting protein) gene in the brains of PD patients [15]. Another study also found four missenses (T383N, R606Q, N906H, and E709Q) of SNCAIP in 202 South African PD patients [44]. APOE gene encodes a protein underlying lipid metabolism. Various APOE alleles have distinct impacts on the progression of PD and the accumulation of central amyloidopathy, specially, AOPE-ε4 allele, which has a particularly harmful effect. Animals carrying APOE-ε4 allele demonstrated the most severe alpha-synuclein disease and experienced the shortest lifespan [16, 90]. APOE-ε4 allele is well known as a key determinant of Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive impairment [38]. In this study, we also observed four variants of SNCAIP (\(\uparrow\)rs5870994), SNCAIP (\(\uparrow\)rs17367669), APOE (\(\downarrow\)rs429358), and APOE (\(\uparrow\)rs429358) involved in the progression of PD, especially in patients with cognitive decline. On the other hand, mutations in LRRK2 can cause abnormally increased kinase activity, causing PD development [68]. Patients with autosomal dominant PD and those with apparent sporadic PD, who cannot be clinically differentiated from those with idiopathic PD, exhibit LRRK2 mutations, with the most prevalent mutation being Gly2019Ser [81]. The link between prevalent SNCA and LRRK2 variants and PD has been well described in previous literature [47, 64, 69, 71]. Thus, it is necessary to further analyze the specific variants of SNCA, SNCAIP, APOE, and LRRK2 for PD management.
Endophilin-A1 is involved in the process of synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Endophilin-A1 is essential for the growth of dendrites, which is dependent on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Endophiline-A1 and SH3GL2 collaborate to facilitate the signaling of BDNF- neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 2 from early endosomes and early endocytic trafficking [82]. SH3GL2 (SH3-domain GRB2-like 2, a synaptic endocytic gene) was discovered in a GWAS meta-analysis of PD, establishing a connection between PD and SH3GL2 that has a role in regulating synaptic vesicle endocytosis [11]. A new mutation that increases the risk of PD in SH3GL2 (endophiline-A1) was found, which can impair the protein’s ability to sense calcium, making it immobile and unable to react to calcium influx, which prevents autophagy induction at synapses [17]. Further, a model of SH3GL2 knockout mice also consistently displayed synaptic endocytic abnormalities, emphasizing the critical need for precise synaptic vesicle endocytosis regulation in preserving the integrity of axon terminals [55]. Adaptor-associated kinase 1 (AAK1) is a Ser/Thr protein kinase that plays a crucial role in regulating clathrin-mediated endocytosis [13]. AAK1 is found throughout the central nervous system and is a crucial factor in the onset age of PD [48]. This study observed that two variants in the hub SH3GL2 gene ((\(\uparrow\)rs10756907 and \(\downarrow\)rs13294100) and one variant in AAK1 gene (\(\downarrow\)rs7577851) contributed to disruptions in synaptic vesicle endocytosis, which play a substantial role in PD pathogenesis. Dysregulation of synaptic vesicle and synaptic adhesion pathways were also listed as the predominant pathways underlying the pathogenesis of PD. These findings suggest that targeting the SH3GL2 gene as well as other synaptic endocytic genes (AAK1) is a promising approach for PD management.

Other genetic variations implicated in the pathogenesis of PD

TMEM175 encodes a lysosomal potassium channel critical for regulating lysosomal pH and membrane potential. Alterations in TMEM175 function disrupt autophagic flux and lysosomal degradation, resulting in the buildup of misfolded proteins like α-synuclein, a key feature of PD pathology [32]. Studies have linked TMEM175 variants to decreased lysosomal efficiency and heightened neuronal susceptibility in PD models [39]. BST1 (bone marrow stromal cell antigen 1) plays a role in modulating immune responses and neuroinflammation [36]. Variants in BST1 are associated with an elevated risk of PD, likely by enhancing chronic microglial activation and inflammatory pathways in the brain [87]. These observations underscore the increasing evidence implicating neuroinflammatory mechanisms in PD progression.
Given that the loss of dopaminergic neurons is the defining characteristic of PD, genes that are specifically expressed in these neurons are potential factors that may contribute to the genetic cause of PD. SLCO1B3 (solute carrier family 6 member 3) is a human dopamine transporter gene. The association between impaired SLCO1B3 function and PD has been reported. For example, a meta-analysis study found that the 10-repeat allele of the 40-base pair variable number tandem repeat, a widely investigated genetic variation in the 3’untranslated region of SLC6A3, provides neuroprotection in East Asian populations (odd ratio: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.65–0.94), while the presence of the GG genotype and the G allele of the promoter single nucleotide polymorphism rs2652510 is linked to an increased risk in Caucasians. The allelic G has an odds ratio of 1.26 (95%CI: 1.04–1.54) and genotypic GG has an odds ratio of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.03–1.84) [89]. GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) exerts a regulatory influence on the pathogenesis of PD that is not influenced by dopaminergic treatment [62, 83]. Dopamine can directly regulate recombinant GABAARs by binding to the β3 subunit, even in the absence of GABA [29]. The GABAAR/Cl, HCO3ATPase found in the rat brain plays a role in the phenol-induced symptoms of head-twitching and tremors [54]. A correlation between dopamine and GABA was also found in the basal ganglia in the PD model in mice [56]. CADM1 (cell adhesion molecule 1) is a multifunctional cell adhesion molecule that has been recognized as a tumor suppressor gene [70]. There was evidence of CADM1 expression in dopamine neurons in the middle brain, especially in the substantia nigra pars compacta, the ventral tegmental area, in the PD patients and a mouse model of peripheral myelinated axons [1, 60]. In this study, various variants were implicated in the processes of dopamine transporters and release, cell adhesion, and receptor recycling, including SLCO1B3 (\(\downarrow\)rs143371462), GABRG2 (\(\uparrow\)rs11949046), CADM1 (\(\uparrow\)rs4436579), and GABRG3 (\(\downarrow\) rs17565841). Therefore, focusing on these genetic variants is crucial in the management of PD.
ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6) is a type 2 transmembrane protein that is linked with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). It has a stress-sensing domain in its carboxy-terminal luminal region and functions as a transcription factor with a basic leucine zipper domain [28]. ATF6, a defensive component of the unfolded protein response, undergoes processing by COPII-mediated ER-Golgi transport after being activated by ER stress. Alpha-synuclein inhibited the processing of ATF6 by directly interacting with alpha-synuclein and indirectly by limiting its inclusion in COPII vesicles [78]. ATF6 signaling dysfunction was accompanied by reduced ER-associated degradation capacity and heightened pro-apoptotic signaling. The inhibition of ATF6 signaling by alpha-synuclein elucidates the involvement of ER stress and the unfolded protein response in PD [14]. This study also highlighted the role of ATF6 (\(\downarrow\)rs10918270)), so the elucidation of the inhibitory mechanism of alpha-synuclein on ATF6 signaling enhances our comprehension of the involvement of ER stress and the unfolded protein response in PD.
The maintenance of water balance in the brain is crucial from both a physiological and therapeutic perspective. Neuronal activity and the regulation of water and ion balance are closely interconnected. Aquaporin, a type of water channel protein, serves crucial roles in facilitating water transport throughout the brain [3]. Changes in levels of AQP1 and AQP4 expression were associated with the accumulation of amyloid beta in the brain of people with Alzheimer’s disease and PD [30, 31]. AQP10 (aquaporin 10) belongs to the aquaglyceroporin family of integral membrane proteins. AQP10 has been demonstrated to act as a channel that selectively allows the passage of water while also being able to allow the passage of neutral solutes (urea and glycerol) [27]. A GWAS study of 3364 PD patients (mean follow-up of 4.2 years) observed an association between AQP10, rs35950207, and motor progression [77]. ANO2 (anoctamin 2) is a member of a group of chloride channels that are activated by calcium. ANO2 has a crucial role in various cellular processes, such as the enhancement of olfactory signal transmission and the regulation of neuronal excitability [26]. ANO2 has been associated with multiple sclerosis, type 3 von Willebrand disease, and Alzheimer’s disease [2, 9, 84]. On the other hand, nucleoside transporters are integral membrane proteins that play a vital role in the process of nucleoside salvage. SLC28A3 (solute carrier family 28 member 3) is particularly important in this process due to the wider range of substances it can transport and its greater ability to concentrate these substances compared to its members (hCNT1 and hCNT2) [20]. The expression levels of SLC28A3 were significantly increased in the SH-SY5Y cell PD model caused by 6-hydroxydopamine [49]. This analysis emphasized the role of transporter and water channel underlying the etiology of PD associated with two important genetic variations (SLC28A3 (\(\downarrow\)rs148603475), ANO2 (\(\downarrow\)rs74709761), and AQP10 (\(\downarrow\)rs35950207)).
Dopamine neurons exhibit high levels of the protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type D (PTPRD), which likely contributes to the restructuring of brain networks by influencing the interaction between G protein-coupled receptor hormones and heteromers that regulate dopaminergic modulation [19]. GPR32 (G protein-coupled receptor 32) participates in the process of macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and the polarization of macrophages towards a pro-resolution phenotype, but it also controls adaptive immune responses by inhibiting the development of T cells into Th1 and Th17 phenotypes and by boosting the production of regulatory T cells [67]. PTPRD was found to contribute to the pathogenesis of PD and dopamine-related symptoms (bradykinesia and rigidity) [22]. Neurotrophin has a strong attraction to transmembrane tyrosine kinase proteins known as Trk neurotrophin receptor kinase (NTRK) [33]. BDNF, a neurotrophin, exhibits a strong affinity for NTRK2 and significantly influences neural plasticity. BDNF/NTRK2 also influences the reward circuitry regulated by the dopaminergic circuit [63]. In an in vivo study, the role of the neurotrophin receptor NTRK2B in the preservation of dopamine and serotonin neurons in zebrafish was investigated. GPR32 was implicated in the inflammation processes and PD pathogenesis [10]. This study also found PTPRD (\(\uparrow\)rs7870456), NTRK2 (\(\downarrow\)rs148603475), GPR32 (G protein-coupled receptor 32), and GPR321 (\(\uparrow\)rs4802739) underlying the pathogenesis of PD. It is plausible to explain that the dysregulation of the interaction between PTPRD, NTRK2, and G protein-coupled receptor in dopamine neurons is causing PD development.
SQOR (sulfide: quinone oxidoreductase) is an extrinsic membrane protein that facilitates the conversion of sulfide compounds into elemental sulfur through oxidation. Elevating the amount of SQOR in the brain, either through adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer or sulfide preconditioning by periodically inhaling H2S, suppressed neurodegeneration and enhanced motor dysfunction in PD mice [57]. SULT1C2 (sulfotransferase family 1 C member 2) is an isoform of the sulfotransferase family implicated in the sulfation of extracellular matrix components. A GWAS study of 856 PD patients observed an association between ULT1C2 and PD etiology (the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-IVa-dyskinesia subscore and UPDRS-IVb-fluctuations subscore) [53]. Qualitative analysis and robustness testing of cell type-proportionate changes in PD discovered SULT1C2, designating a particular expression in the identified microglia cluster [41]. CYP4Z1 (cytochrome P450 family 4 subfamily Z member 1) exhibited two single nucleotide polymorphisms that are associated with an odds ratio value greater than 5 in predisposition for PD patients [25]. CYP4Z1 (rs6675902) was found to be associated with the age-at-onset of PD [61]. The ubiquitous expression of CYP4Z1 was found in a model of PD in Drosophila [35]. In a Parkinson’s progression markers initiative cohort, CYP4Z1 exhibited a total of 781 SNPs, with only a small number showing a significantly increased occurrence in PD patients compared to healthy controls [25]. This highlights the significant role of CYP4Z1 in the etiology of PD. These studies also found three variants SQOR, (\(\uparrow\)rs17554587), CYP4Z1 (\(\uparrow\)rs116504637), SULT1C2 (\(\uparrow\)rs13424530) underlying the PD etiology. Taken together, SQOR is an enzyme that participates in the process of removing hydrogen sulfide from the body, whereas SULT1C2 and CYP4Z1 are a sulfotransferases and CYP450 enzymes that play a role in the metabolism of many substances, such as hormones and medications. Therefore, the targeting of these enzymes is crucial in the management of PD.
CDH13 (cadherin-13) facilitates brain plasticity and promotes neuronal development. Genetic mutations in the gene can impair the protein’s ability to inhibit the growth of axons during development and its capacity to protect against oxidative stress [65]. Ultimately, these mutations may contribute to the gradual loss of cells in PD. So, this possibility for PD is intriguing since CDH13 promotes the movement, growth, and multiplication of neuronal cells [65, 76]. Remarkably, CDH13 is found in brain areas that are impacted by PD. FANCF (Fanconi anemia complementation group F) participants in the development of Fanconi anemia, a study of the serum of idiopathic PD (IPD) patients found lower levels of FANCF in the IPD group [88]. OCA2 (oculocutaneous albinism II) is linked to the typical diversity in eye, skin, and hair color [74]. Increased occurrences of OCA2 variations have been observed in cases of PD, and there appears to be a connection between OCA2 and the earlier beginning of PD, suggesting that there may be a mechanism connected to neuromelanin that is responsible for this effect [48]. In this study, we observed that CDH13 (\(\downarrow\)rs13330839), FANCF (\(\downarrow\)rs55971529), and OCA2 (\(\downarrow\)rs17565841) also play an important role in PD etiology. The genes CDH13, FANCF, and OCA2 are not usually acknowledged as significant contributors to the development of PD; more work is needed to elucidate the link between these genes and PD.
On the other hand, this study also found that RIT2 and MCCC1 play an important role in PD pathology. RIT2, a member of the Ras-like GTPase family, has been implicated in the regulation of neuronal signaling and dopamine transporter function, suggesting that variants in this gene may influence dopaminergic neuron vulnerability in PD [23]. MCCC1 encodes a mitochondrial enzyme involved in leucine catabolism, and its dysfunction could contribute to metabolic stress and mitochondrial impairment observed in PD [72]. Together, these genes highlight additional molecular pathways—beyond the classic SNCA and LRRK2 networks—that may modulate disease onset and progression.

MiRNAs implicated in the pathogenesis of PD

Transcription factors and miRNAs are two important categories of gene expression regulators. Transcription factors regulate gene expression by binding to specific regions of the DNA called promotor regions, whereas miRNAs regulate gene expression after transcription has occurred by connecting with specific regions on the mRNA called 3’ untranslated regions. Disruption of regulatory gene expression can lead to PD [59]. miR-20a-5p has a role in causing inflammation in the brain and the buildup of harmful molecules due to oxidative stress. miR-20a-5p mitigated mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and cell death caused by the 1-methyl-4-phenyl pyridine ion (MPP+) in HT22 cells by suppressing the IRF9/NF-κB axis, which is an in vitro model of PD [85]. MYT1L (a transcription factor similar to myelin) has been discovered to have a connection with induced dopaminergic neurons [86]. MYT1L demonstrates functioning dopaminergic neurotransmission and alleviates locomotor symptoms in a PD model animal [5], suggesting that it presents novel possibilities for studying transplantation and modeling diseases associated with PD. In line with that, this study also observed an association between hsa-miR-20a-5p, MYT1L, and PD. These findings suggest that hsa-miR-20a-5p and MYT1L can be promising targets for developing new treatments for PD.
This study utilized a dataset consisting of 68 previous GWASs to gain a deeper comprehension of the molecular mechanisms underlying gene alterations in individuals with PD. These findings establish the foundation for future inquiries into potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of PD. Nevertheless, this analysis was dependent on data collected from the GWAS database. Hence, the accuracy and excellence of the interactions in this database play a crucial role in transforming the observed outcomes. While the findings on miRNAs and transcription factors align with previous studies, further investigation is required to validate these results.

Conclusion

The present work entailed a comprehensive examination of data generated from the GWAS database, with the aim of identifying noteworthy genetic differences and elucidating the underlying molecular pathways connected with the etiology of PD arising from genetic variants. Six common biomarkers (SNCA, TMEM175, BST1, RIT2, LRRK2, and MCCC1) associated with PD were detected across all 68 studies. SNCA (\(\uparrow\)rs5019538 and (\(\uparrow\)rs356182), LRRK2 (\(\uparrow\)rs34637584 and (\(\uparrow\)rs76904798), and SH3GL2 (\(\uparrow\)rs10756907 and (\(\downarrow\)rs13294100) were the predominant biomarkers underlying PD. Other biomarkers (APOE, NTRK2, SLCO1B3, SLC28A3, AQP10, SNCAIP, ANO2, CADM1, PTPRD, GPR32, GPR321, SQOR, SULT1C2, GABRG2, CYP4Z1, CDH13, and FANCF) have been found underlying the clinical traits of PD, including age at onset, cognitive progression, motor progression, composite progression, and tremor dominant and postural instability gait difficulty. There was substantial evidence of impaired dopamine secretion, receptor recycling, and oxidoreductase activity and increased amyloid-beta formation associated with genetic variations with a higher risk of PD. Significant evidence indicated improved synaptic vesicle pathway, neuron projection development, and regulated histone methylation and excitatory postsynaptic potential related to genetic variants that carry a lower risk of PD. We also identified hsa-miR-20a-5p and MYT1L that play a crucial role in elucidating the genetic variants associated with PD. The aforementioned discoveries serve as a fundamental basis for potential therapeutic interventions targeting PD, with a particular emphasis on the genetic variations and mechanisms associated with the condition.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
All authors have given consent for the publication. 
Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Elucidate biomarkers and the molecular pathways associated with genetic variants that contribute to the etiology of Parkinson’s disease
Verfasst von
Hai Duc Nguyen
Publikationsdatum
30.09.2025
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Acta Neurologica Belgica / Ausgabe 6/2025
Print ISSN: 0300-9009
Elektronische ISSN: 2240-2993
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02897-7

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aguila J, Cheng S, Kee N, Cao M, Wang M, Deng Q, Hedlund E (2021) Spatial RNA sequencing identifies robust markers of vulnerable and resistant human midbrain dopamine neurons and their expression in Parkinson’s disease. Front Mol Neurosci 14:699562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2021.699562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayoglu B, Mitsios N, Kockum I, Khademi M, Zandian A, Sjöberg R, Forsström B, Bredenberg J, Lima Bomfim I, Holmgren E et al (2016) Anoctamin 2 identified as an autoimmune target in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:2188–2193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518553113CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Badaut J, Lasbennes F, Magistretti PJ, Regli L (2002) Aquaporins in brain: distribution, physiology, and pathophysiology. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 22:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200204000-00001CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Fridman W-H, Pagès F, Trajanoski Z, Galon J (2009) ClueGO: a cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 25:1091–1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101. (%J Bioinformatics)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Black Joshua B, Adler Andrew F, Wang H-G, D’Ippolito Anthony M, Hutchinson Hunter A, Reddy Timothy E, Pitt Geoffrey S, Leong Kam W, Gersbach Charles A (2016) Targeted epigenetic remodeling of endogenous loci by CRISPR/Cas9-based transcriptional activators directly converts fibroblasts to neuronal cells. Cell Stem Cell 19:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.07.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blauwendraat C, Heilbron K, Vallerga CL, Bandres-Ciga S, von Coelln R, Pihlstrøm L, Simón-Sánchez J, Schulte C, Sharma M, Krohn L (2019) Parkinson’s disease age at onset genome-wide association study: defining heritability, genetic loci, and α-synuclein mechanisms. Mov Disord 34:866–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Blauwendraat C, Nalls MA, Singleton AB (2020) The genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 19:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30287-xCrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C (2021) Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 397:2284–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00218-xCrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cenedese V, Mezzavilla M, Morgan A, Marino R, Ettorre CP, Margaglione M, Gasparini P, Menini A (2015) Assessment of the olfactory function in Italian patients with type 3 von Willebrand disease caused by a homozygous 253 kb deletion involving VWF and TMEM16B/ANO2. PLoS ONE 10:e0116483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chamani S, Bianconi V, Tasbandi A, Pirro M, Barreto GE, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A (2020) Resolution of inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of resolvins. Mediators Inflamm 2020:3267172. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3267172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang D, Nalls MA, Hallgrímsdóttir IB, Hunkapiller J, van der Brug M, Cai F, Kerchner GA, Ayalon G, Bingol B, Sheng M et al (2017) A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson’s disease risk loci. Nat Genet 49:1511–1516. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3955CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin C-H, Chen S-H, Wu H-H, Ho C-W, Ko M-T, Lin C-Y (2014) CytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol 8:S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Conner SD, Schmid SL (2002) Identification of an adaptor-associated kinase, AAK1, as a regulator of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Cell Biol 156:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200108123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Credle JJ, Forcelli PA, Delannoy M, Oaks AW, Permaul E, Berry DL, Duka V, Wills J, Sidhu A (2015) Α-synuclein-mediated inhibition of ATF6 processing into COPII vesicles disrupts UPR signaling in parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 76:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2015.02.005CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dashtipour K, Tafreshi A, Adler C, Beach T, Chen X, Serrano G, Tashiro S, Wang C (2017) Hypermethylation of synphilin-1, alpha-synuclein-interacting protein (SNCAIP) gene in the cerebral cortex of patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Brain Sci 7:74. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7070074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis AA, Inman CE, Wargel ZM, Dube U, Freeberg BM, Galluppi A, Haines JN, Dhavale DD, Miller R, Choudhury FA (2020) APOE genotype regulates pathology and disease progression in synucleinopathy. Sci Transl Med 12:eaay3069. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay3069CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Decet M, Soukup SF (2023) Endophilin-a/SH3GL2 calcium switch for synaptic autophagy induction is impaired by a Parkinson’s risk variant. Autophagy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2023.2200627CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, Biglan KM, Holloway RG, Kieburtz K, Marshall FJ, Ravina BM, Schifitto G, Siderowf A al (2007) Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology 68:384. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Earley CJ, Uhl GR, Clemens S, Ferré S (2017) Connectome and molecular pharmacological differences in the dopaminergic system in restless legs syndrome (RLS): plastic changes and neuroadaptations that may contribute to augmentation. Sleep Med 31:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2016.06.003CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Errasti-Murugarren E, Molina-Arcas M, Casado FJ, Pastor-Anglada M (2009) A splice variant of the SLC28A3 gene encodes a novel human concentrative nucleoside transporter-3 (hCNT3) protein localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. FASEB J 23:172–182. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-113902CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Foo JN, Chew EGY, Chung SJ, Peng R, Blauwendraat C, Nalls MA, Mok KY, Satake W, Toda T, Chao Yet al et al (2020) Identification of risk loci for Parkinson disease in Asians and comparison of risk between Asians and Europeans: a genome-wide association study. JAMA Neurol 77:746–754. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0428CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gan-Or Z, Alcalay RN, Bar-Shira A, Leblond CS, Postuma RB, Ben-Shachar S, Waters C, Johnson A, Levy O, Mirelman A (2015) Genetic markers of restless legs syndrome in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 21:582–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.03.010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao AYL, Montagna DR, Hirst WD, Temkin PA (2024) RIT2 regulates autophagy lysosomal pathway induction and protects against α-synuclein pathology in a cellular model of parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 199:106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106568CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Goedert M, Jakes R, Spillantini MG (2017) The synucleinopathies: twenty years on. J Parkinsons Dis 7(s1):S51-s69. https://doi.org/10.3233/jpd-179005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartz P, Fehlmann T, Wagenpfeil G, Unger MM, Bernhardt R (2022) A CYPome-wide study reveals new potential players in the pathogenesis of parkinson’s disease. Front Pharmacol 13:1094265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1094265CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartzell HC, Yu K, Xiao Q, Chien LT, Qu Z (2009) Anoctamin/TMEM16 family members are Ca2+-activated Cl- channels. J Physiol 587:2127–2139. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.163709CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatakeyama S, Yoshida Y, Tani T, Koyama Y, Nihei K, Ohshiro K, Kamiie JI, Yaoita E, Suda T, Hatakeyama K (2001) Cloning of a new aquaporin (AQP10) abundantly expressed in duodenum and jejunum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 287:814–819. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5661CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Haze K, Yoshida H, Yanagi H, Yura T, Mori K (1999) Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell 10:3787–3799. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.11.3787CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoerbelt P, Lindsley TA, Fleck MW (2015) Dopamine directly modulates GABAA receptors. J Neurosci 35:3525–3536. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4390-14.2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoshi A, Yamamoto T, Shimizu K, Ugawa Y, Nishizawa M, Takahashi H, Kakita A (2012) Characteristics of aquaporin expression surrounding senile plaques and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 71:750–759. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182632566CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoshi A, Tsunoda A, Tada M, Nishizawa M, Ugawa Y, Kakita A (2017) Expression of aquaporin 1 and aquaporin 4 in the temporal neocortex of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Pathol 27:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12369CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu M, Li P, Wang C, Feng X, Geng Q, Chen W, Marthi M, Zhang W, Gao C, Reid W al (2022) Parkinson’s disease-risk protein TMEM175 is a proton-activated proton channel in lysosomes. Cell 185:2292–2308e2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang EJ, Reichardt LF (2001) Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:677–736. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibáñez P, Bonnet AM, Débarges B, Lohmann E, Tison F, Pollak P, Agid Y, Dürr A, Brice A (2004) Causal relation between alpha-synuclein gene duplication and familial parkinson’s disease. Lancet 364:1169–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17104-3CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Idda T, Bonas C, Hoffmann J, Bertram J, Quinete N, Schettgen T, Fietkau K, Esser A, Stope MB, Leijs MM (2020) Metabolic activation and toxicological evaluation of polychlorinated biphenyls in drosophila melanogaster. Sci Rep 10:21587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78405-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue T, Umene R, Sung SJ, Tanaka S, Huang L, Yao J, Hashimoto N, Wu CH, Nakamura Y, Nishino T (2024) Bone marrow stromal cell antigen-1 deficiency protects from acute kidney injury. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 326:F167-f177. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00175.2023CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwaki H, Blauwendraat C, Leonard HL, Kim JJ, Liu G, Maple-Grødem J, Corvol JC, Pihlstrøm L, van Nimwegen M Hutten SJ (2019) Genomewide association study of Parkinson’s disease clinical biomarkers in 12 longitudinal patients’ cohorts. Mov Disord 34: 1839–1850 https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27845
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Jing Q, Rebecca AB, Bradley TH, Alberto S-P (2021) Association of APOEGenotype With Heterogeneity of Cognitive Decline Rate in Alzheimer Disease. Neurology 96: e2414 Doi 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011883
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Jinn S, Drolet RE, Cramer PE, Wong AH, Toolan DM, Gretzula CA, Voleti B, Vassileva G, Disa J, Tadin-Strapps M et al (2017) TMEM175 deficiency impairs lysosomal and mitochondrial function and increases α-synuclein aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616332114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson ME, Stecher B, Labrie V, Brundin L, Brundin P (2019) Triggers, facilitators, and aggravators: redefining Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Trends Neurosci 42:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.09.007CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamath T, Abdulraouf A, Burris SJ, Langlieb J, Gazestani V, Nadaf NM, Balderrama K, Vanderburg C, Macosko EZ (2022) Single-cell genomic profiling of human dopamine neurons identifies a population that selectively degenerates in Parkinson’s disease. Nat Neurosci 25(5):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01061-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Keenan AB, Torre D, Lachmann A, Leong AK, Wojciechowicz ML, Utti V, Jagodnik KM, Kropiwnicki E, Wang Z, Ma’ayan AJN (2019) ChIP-X Enrichment Analysis version 3 (CHEA3) Available at: https://maayanlab.cloud/chea3/. Accessed Accessed on 20 December 2022
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Keenan AB, Torre D, Lachmann A, Leong AK, Wojciechowicz ML, Utti V, Jagodnik KM, Kropiwnicki E, Wang Z (2019) Ma’ayan AJNar ChEA3: transcription factor enrichment analysis by orthogonal omics integration. 47: W212-W224
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyser RJ, Oppon E, Carr JA, Bardien S (2011) Identification of Parkinson’s disease candidate genes using CAESAR and screening of MAPT and SNCAIP in South African Parkinson’s disease patients. J Neural Transm 118:889–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-011-0591-zCrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kia DA, Zhang D, Guelfi S, Manzoni C, Hubbard L, Reynolds RH, Botía J, Ryten M, Ferrari R, Lewis PA (2021) Identification of candidate Parkinson disease genes by integrating genome-wide association study, expression, and epigenetic data sets. JAMA Neurol 78:464–472. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5257CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Krichevsky AM, King KS, Donahue CP, Khrapko K, Kosik KS (2003) A microrna array reveals extensive regulation of micrornas during brain development. RNA 9:1274–1281. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.5980303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Lake J, Reed X, Langston RG, Nalls MA, Gan-Or Z, Cookson MR, Singleton AB, Blauwendraat C, Leonard HL (2022) Coding and noncoding variation in LRRK2 and parkinson’s disease risk. Mov Disord 37:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28787CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Latourelle JC, Pankratz N, Dumitriu A, Wilk JB, Goldwurm S, Pezzoli G, Mariani CB, DeStefano AL, Halter C, Gusella JF al (2009) Genomewide association study for onset age in Parkinson disease. BMC Med Genet 10:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei C, Zhongyan Z, Wenting S, Jing Z, Liyun Q, Hongyi H, Juntao Y, Qing Y (2023) Identification of necroptosis-related genes in Parkinson’s disease by integrated bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Front Neurosci 17:1097293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1097293CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Licursi V (2019) MIENTURNET (MicroRNA ENrichment TURned NETwork) Availabe at: http://​userver.​bio.​uniroma1.​it/​apps/​mienturnet/​ . Accessed Accessed on 20 December 2022
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Licursi V, Conte F, Fiscon G, Paci P (2019) MIENTURNET: an interactive web tool for microRNA-target enrichment and network-based analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 20:545. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3105-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Z, Yang N, Dong J, Tian W, Chang L, Ma J, Guo J, Tan J, Dong A, He K (2022) Deficiency in endocannabinoid synthase DAGLB contributes to early onset parkinsonism and murine nigral dopaminergic neuron dysfunction. Nat Commun 13:3490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31168-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Markopoulou K, Chase BA, Premkumar AP, Schoneburg B, Kartha N, Wei J, Yu H, Epshteyn A, Garduno L, Pham Aet al et al (2021) Variable effects of PD-risk associated SNPs and variants in Parkinsonism-associated genes on disease phenotype in a community-based cohort. Front Neurol 12:662278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.662278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzikov S, Menzikova O (2002) Interaction of pentobarbital with Gabaergic drugs acting on the Cl(-)-ATPase activity of the plasma membranes from Bream brain (Abramis brama L). Neurosci Lett 334:161–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01076-5CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Milosevic I, Giovedi S, Lou X, Raimondi A, Collesi C, Shen H, Paradise S, O’Toole E, Ferguson S, Cremona Oet al et al (2011) Recruitment of endophilin to clathrin-coated pit necks is required for efficient vesicle uncoating after fission. Neuron 72:587–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Mograbi KM, de Castro AC, de Oliveira JA, Sales PJ, Covolan L, Del Bel EA, de Souza AS (2017) Effects of GABAa receptor antagonists on motor behavior in pharmacological Parkinson’s disease model in mice. Physiological Rep 5. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13081
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagashima F, Miyazaki Y, Kanemaru E, Ezaka M, Hara H, Sugiura K, Boerboom SL, Ostrom KF, Jiang W, Bloch DB ((2023)) Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase ameliorates neurodegeneration in a murine model of Parkinson’s disease. Redox Biol 59:102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2022.102562CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Nalls MA, Blauwendraat C, Vallerga CL, Heilbron K, Bandres-Ciga S, Chang D, Tan M, Kia DA, Noyce AJ, Xue A (2019) Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol 18:1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30320-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Nassar A, Kodi T, Satarker S, Gurram PC, Fayaz SM, Nampoothiri M (2024) Astrocytic transcription factors REST, YY1, and putative MicroRNAs in parkinson’s disease and advanced therapeutic strategies. Gene 892:147898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2023.147898CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Natasha S, Anya V, Yael E-E, Elior P (2021) Differential contribution of Cadm1–Cadm3 cell adhesion molecules to peripheral myelinated axons. J Neurosci 41:1393. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2736-20.2020CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira SA, Li YJ, Noureddine MA, Zuchner S, Qin X, Pericak-Vance MA, Vance JM (2005) Identification of risk and age-at-onset genes on chromosome 1p in Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet 77:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/432588CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Paris-Robidas S, Brochu E, Sintes M, Emond V, Bousquet M, Vandal M, Pilote M, Tremblay C, Di Paolo T, Rajput AH et al (2012) Defective dentate nucleus GABA receptors in essential tremor. Brain 135:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr301CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Parkinson GM, Dayas CV, Smith DW (2015) Age-related gene expression changes in substantia nigra dopamine neurons of the rat. Mech Ageing Dev 149:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2015.06.002CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen CC, Lange J, Førland MGG, Macleod AD, Alves G, Maple-Grødem J (2021) A systematic review of associations between common SNCA variants and clinical heterogeneity in parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 7:54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-021-00196-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Philippova M, Joshi MB, Kyriakakis E, Pfaff D, Erne P, Resink TJ (2009) A guide and guard: the many faces of T-cadherin. Cell Signal 21:1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.01.035CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Pihlstrøm L, Blauwendraat C, Cappelletti C, Berge-Seidl V, Langmyhr M, Henriksen SP, van de Berg WDJ, Gibbs JR, Cookson MR, Singleton AB et al (2018) A comprehensive analysis of SNCA-related genetic risk in sporadic parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 84:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25274CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirault J, Bäck M (2018) Lipoxin and resolvin receptors transducing the resolution of inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Front Pharmacol 9:1273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocha EM, Keeney MT, Di Maio R, De Miranda BR, Greenamyre JT (2022) LRRK2 and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci 45:224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2021.12.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross OA, Wilhoite GJ, Bacon JA, Soto-Ortolaza A, Kachergus J, Cobb SA, Puschmann A, Vilariño-Güell C, Farrer MJ, Graff-Radford N (2010) LRRK2 variation and Parkinson’s disease in African Americans. Mov Disord 25:1973–1976. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawada Y, Mashima E, Saito-Sasaki N, Nakamura M (2020) The role of cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1) in cutaneous malignancies. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249732CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson C, Vinikoor-Imler L, Nassan FL, Shirvan J, Lally C, Dam T, Maserejian N (2022) Prevalence of ten LRRK2 variants in Parkinson’s disease: a comprehensive review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 98:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.05.012CrossRefPubMed
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Sogabe S, Nakano H, Ogasahara Y, Cha PC, Ando Y, Taniguchi-Ikeda M, Matsumoto R, Kanagawa M, Kobayashi K, Murayama S al (2025) Regulation of MCCC1 expression by a parkinson’s disease-associated intronic variant: implications for pathogenesis. J Hum Genet 70:371–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-025-01335-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R, Goedert M (1997) Alpha-synuclein in lewy bodies. Nature 388:839–840. https://doi.org/10.1038/42166CrossRefPubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Stacey SN, Helgason A, Rafnar T, Magnusson KP, Manolescu A, Karason A, Palsson A, Thorleifsson G al (2007) Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans. Nat Genet 39:1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2007.13CrossRefPubMed
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Szelągowski A, Kozakiewicz M (2023) A glance at biogenesis and functionality of microRNAs and their role in the neuropathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2023:7759053. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7759053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi T, Misaki A, Liang SB, Tachibana A, Hayashi N, Sonobe H, Ohtsuki Y (2000) Expression of T-cadherin (CDH13, H-cadherin) in human brain and its characteristics as a negative growth regulator of epidermal growth factor in neuroblastoma cells. J Neurochem 74:1489–1497. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741489.xCrossRefPubMed
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan MMX, Lawton MA, Jabbari E, Reynolds RH, Iwaki H, Blauwendraat C, Kanavou S, Pollard MI, Hubbard L, Malek Net al et al (2021) Genome-Wide association studies of cognitive and motor progression in parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 36:424–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28342CrossRefPubMed
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Thayanidhi N, Helm JR, Nycz DC, Bentley M, Liang Y, Hay JC (2010) Alpha-synuclein delays Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells by antagonizing ER/Golgi snares. Mol Biol Cell 21:1850–1863. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e09-09-0801CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Zurück zum Zitat The UniProt Consortium (2017) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D158–d169. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1099CrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, Diemer K, Muruganujan A, Narechania A (2003) PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res 13:2129–2141. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.772403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolosa E, Vila M, Klein C, Rascol O (2020) LRRK2 in Parkinson disease: challenges of clinical trials. Nat Rev Neurol 16:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0301-2CrossRefPubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat UniProt (2023) Q99962_SH3G2_HUMAN https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q99962/entry. Accessed Accessed on 11 November 2023
83.
Zurück zum Zitat van Nuland AJM, den Ouden HEM, Zach H, Dirkx MFM, van Asten JJA, Scheenen TWJ, Toni I, Cools R, Helmich RC (2020) GABAergic changes in the thalamocortical circuit in parkinson’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp 41:1017–1029. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24857CrossRefPubMed
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Dey KK, Chen P-C, Li Y, Niu M, Cho J-H, Wang X, Bai B, Jiao Y, Chepyala SR (2020) Integrated analysis of ultra-deep proteomes in cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and serum reveals a mitochondrial signature in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 15:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-00384-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Q, Wang Y, Zhou F, Li J, Lu G, Zhao Y (2021) Mir-20a-5p regulates MPP(+)-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in HT22 cells by targeting IRF9/NF-κB axis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2021:6621206. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Z, Chu X, Jiang H, Schilling H, Chen S, Feng J (2017) Induced dopaminergic neurons: a new promise for parkinson’s disease. Redox Biol 11:606–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2017.01.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu HL, Yang Y, Chen LN, Li YJ, Cai GE, Wang YQ, Weng YH, Lin XL, Jian J, Chen XC al (2025) The impact of BST1 rs4698412 variant on parkinson’s disease progression in a longitudinal study. Front Aging Neurosci 17:1570347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1570347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Yalçin M, Malhan D, Basti A, Peralta AR, Ferreira JJ, Relógio A (2021) A computational analysis in a cohort of Parkinson’s disease patients and clock-modified colorectal cancer cells reveals common expression alterations in clock-regulated genes. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235978CrossRefPubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhai D, Li S, Zhao Y, Lin Z (2014) SLC6A3 is a risk factor for parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of sixteen years’ studies. Neurosci Lett 564:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.10.060CrossRefPubMed
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao N, Attrebi ON, Ren Y, Qiao W, Sonustun B, Martens YA, Meneses AD, Li F, Shue F, Zheng J (2020) APOE4 exacerbates α-synuclein pathology and related toxicity independent of amyloid. Sci Transl Med 12:eaay1809. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay1809CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Neurologie (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Fazialisparese in der Liquordiagnostik aufgeklärt

Periphere Fazialisparesen sollten nicht vorschnell als idiopathisch klassifiziert werden. Vor allem bei atypischen Manifestationen gilt es, auf dem Quivive zu sein. Der Fall einer 73-Jährigen zeigt, warum.

Hilft Kaffee gegen Demenz?

  • 16.02.2026
  • Demenz
  • Nachrichten

Mit zwei bis drei Tassen Kaffee am Tag ist das Demenzrisiko um fast ein Fünftel reduziert, auch die kognitive Leistung ist dann deutlich besser als bei Kaffee-Abstinenz. Das gilt jedoch nur für koffeinhaltigen Kaffee. Ob Koffein tatsächlich protektiv wirkt, lässt eine Langzeitstudie aber offen.

Antibiotikum verbessert Prognose nach leichtem Schlaganfall

Eine Therapie mit Minocyclin kann das funktionelle Ergebnis nach einem milden ischämischen Schlaganfall geringfügig verbessern. In einer Phase-3-Studie aus China lag damit die Chance auf ein sehr gutes funktionelles Ergebnis rund fünf Prozentpunkte höher als unter Placebo.

Schlafarchitektur nach OP oft massiv gestört

Nach einem operativen Eingriff ist die Schlafqualität oft massiv beeinträchtigt. In einer US-Studie waren bei Risikopatienten nicht nur die Gesamtdauer des Schlafs, sondern vor allem auch REM- und Tiefschlafphasen deutlich verkürzt.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Lumbalpunktion/© Felipe Caparrós / stock.adobe.com, Arzt sitzt vor dem PC und trinkt Kaffee/© Jacob Lund / Stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Fachperson breitet Infusion vor/© pirke / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Frauen ruhen im Krankenhaus /© Gorodenkoff / Stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell)