nach oben

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

Erschienen in:

19.10.2018 | Editorial

Embedded Journalists or Empirical Critics? The Nature of The “Gaze” in Bioethics

verfasst von: Michael A. Ashby, Bronwen Morrell

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

ᅟ

Eckstein, L., and M. Otlowski. 2018. Strategies to guide the return of genomic research findings: An Australian perspective. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9856-7.

Foe, G., J. Hellmann, and R.A. Greenberg. 2018. Parental moral distress and moral schism in the neonatal ICU. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9858-5.

Greenblum, J., and T.J. Kasperbauer. 2018. Forget evil: Autonomy, the physician–patient relationship, and the duty to refer. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9854-9.

Greene, M., and Z. Master. 2018. Ethical issues of using CRISPR technologies for research on military enhancement. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9865-6.

Hedgecoe, A. 2004. Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18(2): 120–143.CrossRef

Jongsma, K., N. Rimon-Zarfarty, A. Raz, and S. Schicktanz. 2018. One for all, all for one? Collective representation in healthcare policy. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9870-9.

Koplin, J.J. 2018. Commodification and human interests. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9857-6.

Levy, N. 2018. Responsibility as an obstacle to good policy: The case of lifestyle related disease. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9860-y.

Lewis, A., and D. Greer. 2018. Medicolegal complications of apnoea testing for determination of brain death. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9863-8.

O’Donovan, O., and D. Madden. 2018. Why do medical professional regulators dismiss most complaints from members of the public? Regulatory illiteracy, epistemic injustice, and symbolic power. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9869-2.

Rosemann, A., and H. Luo. 2018. Attitudes towards the donation of human embryos for stem cell research among Chinese IVF patients and students. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15(3): doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9862-9.

Twine, R. 2005. Constructing critical bioethics by deconstructing nature/culture dualism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8(3): 285–295.CrossRef

Titel: Embedded Journalists or Empirical Critics? The Nature of The “Gaze” in Bioethics
verfasst von: Michael A. Ashby
Bronwen Morrell
Publikationsdatum: 19.10.2018
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9879-0

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques

Commodification and Human Interests

Responsibility as an Obstacle to Good Policy: The Case of Lifestyle Related Disease

Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel

Parental Moral Distress and Moral Schism in the Neonatal ICU

Representative Claims in Healthcare: Identifying the Variety in Patient Representation