Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2014

Open Access 01.12.2014 | Poster presentation

Emergency trauma theatre utilisation – the St George’s Hospital, London experience

verfasst von: Alexander J Hills, Alexander Clarke, Christoph EA Hartmann, Caroline B Hing

Erschienen in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Sonderheft 1/2014

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Background

The Royal College of Surgeons of England encouraged the creation of singly dedicated 24-hour emergency theatres in 1997; emergency operating was previously largely determined by theatre availability rather than clinical need. Shortly after this St George’s Hospital, London designated one of its three trauma theatres as an ‘Acute Emergency Theatre’ (AET) and implemented a policy to maintain access to the AET within one hour’s notification for all acute trauma emergencies.
On review it was felt that the system underutilised scarce theatre space and limited the repertoire of surgeries that could be performed. A more efficient use of theatre space was therefore sought. The AET was changed from a fixed physical entity to a nominal entity; where by the AET could be any of the three major trauma theatres, as long as one of them was available within one hour.

Methods

Theatre usage across all three major trauma theatres was prospectively audited three months before and three months after the implementation of the new nominal system following a one-month familiarisation period. An anonymous, Likert based questionnaire was completed by ten of the eleven overseeing trauma consultants to review concerns and ensure our standard of care was maintained.

Results

1325 consecutive operations were performed, 660 operations before and 665 after the systems implementation (p=0.45). A 32% increase in operating hours (216 to 284 hours, p=0.01) within the original AET (Theatre 1) was achieved, and a 10% increase in operating hours (1102 to 1223 hours, p=0.19) seen across all three theatres. There were no serious incident reports regarding access to theatres following implementation of the new system or any compromise to patient care.

Conclusions

Implementing a nominal emergency theatre, rather than utilizing a dedicated emergency theatre allows improved theatre utilization, without adverse event.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Metadaten
Titel
Emergency trauma theatre utilisation – the St George’s Hospital, London experience
verfasst von
Alexander J Hills
Alexander Clarke
Christoph EA Hartmann
Caroline B Hing
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-22-S1-P4

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2014

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe