Skip to main content
main-content

12.01.2019 | Clinical Study | Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2019

Empirical versus progression-guided stereotactic radiosurgery for non-functional pituitary macroadenomas after subtotal resection

Zeitschrift:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology > Ausgabe 2/2019
Autoren:
Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Ching-Jen Chen, Chung-Jung Lin, Hsiu-Mei Wu, Wen-Yuh Chung, Cheng-Ying Shiau, Wan-Yuo Guo, David Hung-Chi Pan
Wichtige Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objective

There is a lack of consensus regarding whether if residual non-functional macroadenomas (NFM) should undergo empirical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or be monitored until tumor progression before SRS treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the risks and benefits of empirical versus progression-guided SRS for NFM after subtotal resection.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of consecutive NFM patients who subtotal surgical resection followed by SRS between 1999 and 2014. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: empirical SRS (SRS without evidence of tumor progression) and progression-guided SRS (SRS after demonstration of tumor progression) groups. Tumor response was categorized into: (1) regression, ≥ 10% decrease in tumor volume; (2) stable, < 10% increase or decrease in tumor volume; and (3) progression, ≥ 10% increase in tumor volume. Tumor control comprised stable tumor response and tumor regression.

Results

Of the 112 patients who underwent SRS for NFM, 106 patients were treated for residual NFM after surgical resection, and included in the final analysis. The empirical SRS and progression-guided SRS groups comprised 46 and 60 patients, respectively. Overall tumor control rate was 88.7%. Higher rate of tumor control was achieved in the empirical SRS group compared to the progression-guided SRS group (95.65% vs. 83.33%, p = 0.047). Rates of new visual field deficit, cranial neuropathy and endocrinopathy were comparable between the two groups. Empirical SRS group had higher rates of progression-free survival compared to progression-guided SRS group (p = 0.015). Actuarial progression-free survival rates for the empirical SRS group were 93.2%, 93.2%, and 81.5% at 3, 5, and 10 years after SRS. Actuarial progression-free survival rates for the progression-guided SRS were 86.4%, 82.1%, and 68.4% at 3, 5, and 10 years after SRS.

Conclusion

Empirical SRS offers higher rates of tumor control and progression-free survival compared to progression-guided SRS in patients with residual NFM after surgical resection. Rates of new hypopituitarism and cranial neuropathies were comparable between the two groups.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  2. Sie können e.Med Neurologie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  3. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Onkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise