Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Oral Health Reports
Erschienen in: Current Oral Health Reports 4/2019

16.11.2019 | Modern Approaches to Endodontics (S Kim and B Karabucak, Section Editors)

Endodontic microsurgery: outcomes and prognostic factors

verfasst von: Euiseong Kim, Yaelim Kim

Erschienen in: Current Oral Health Reports | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review addresses endodontic microsurgery procedures compared with traditional surgery and aims to review factors related to the success and failure of endodontic microsurgery from the existing literature.

Recent Findings

Periodontal involvement and tooth position are patient- and tooth-related factors known to have an effect on the outcome of apical surgery. Factors related to successful outcome have been reported and include whether the mineral trioxide aggregate used to obturate the apical portion of the root after surgery was fast or slow setting. Although not statistically significant, larger difference in the success rate between slow- and fast-setting MTA groups was observed in teeth with endodontic-periodontal lesions than in teeth with isolated endodontic lesions suggesting that the faster setting root-end filling material is most advantageous, particularly when endodontic lesions have periodontal involvement.

Summary

Endodontic microsurgery has witnessed major advances and is currently regarded as an integral part of standard endodontic treatment. Improved visibility and illumination because of the operating microscope, advances in ultrasonic instrument technology, and the development of more biocompatible root-end filling materials have contributed to the technical advances that have led to higher success rates in endodontic microsurgery compared with traditional surgery.
Literatur
1.
Friedman S. Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post-treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure). Endod Top. 2002;1:54–78.
2.
• Setzer FC, Shah SB, Kohli MR, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature--part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2010;36:1757–65 This manuscript reported improved success rate of endodontic microsurgery compared with traditional root-end surgery. PubMed
3.
Creasy JE, Mines P, Sweet M. Surgical trends among endodontists: the results of a web-based survey. J Endod. 2009;35:30–4.PubMed
4.
Yang Y, Rossi FMV, Putnins EE. Periodontal regeneration using engineered bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31:8574–82.PubMed
5.
• Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod. 2006;32:601–23 This manuscript established the concept of endodontic microsurgery. PubMed
6.
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod. 2010;36:1–15.PubMed
7.
Kim E, Fallahrastegar A, Hur YY, Jung IY, Kim S, Lee SJ. Difference in root canal length between Asians and Caucasians. Int Endod J. 2005;38:149–51.PubMed
8.
• Kim E, Song JS, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Kim S. Prospective clinical study evaluating endodontic microsurgery outcomes for cases with lesions of endodontic origin compared with cases with lesions of combined periodontal-endodontic origin. J Endod. 2008;34:546–51 This manuscript compared the success rate of isolated endodontic lesion and combined periodontal-endodontic lesion.PubMed
9.
Song M, Kim H, Lee W, Kim E. Analysis of the cause of failure in nonsurgical endodntic treatment by microscopic inspection during endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2011; In press.
10.
• Song M, Shin S-J, Kim E. Outcomes of endodontic micro-resurgery: a prospective clinical study. J Endod. 2011;37:316–20 This manuscript studied the outcome of micro-resurgery and showed that the success rate of re-surgery is comparable with that of initial surgery in cases which the cause of failure could be identified. PubMed
11.
Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Gutmann JL. Ultrasonic root-end preparation, part 2. Microleakage of EBA root-end fillings. Int Endod J. 1994;27:325–9.PubMed
12.
De Bruyne MA, De Moor RJ. Influence of cracks on leakage and obturation efficiency of root-end filling materials after ultrasonic preparation: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:685–92.PubMed
13.
• Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Horsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A. Randomized clinical trial of root-end resection followed by root-end filling with mineral trioxide aggregate or smoothing of the orthograde gutta-percha root filling--1-year follow-up. Int Endod J. 2009;42:105–14 This manuscript presents the effect of presence of retrofilling material in microsurgery. PubMed
14.
Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR, Hudson MB. A prospective clinical study of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J. 2003;36:520–6.PubMed
15.
Song M, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY, Kim E. Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery: a retrospective study. J Endod. 2011;37:927–33.PubMed
16.
Saunders WP. A prospective clinical study of periradicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling. J Endod. 2008;34:660–5.PubMed
17.
Baek S-H, Lee WC, Setzer FC, Kim S. Periapical bone regeneration after endodontic microsurgery with three different root-end filling materials: Amalgam, SuperEBA, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. J Endod. 2010;36:1323–5.PubMed
18.
Kim Y, Kim S, Shin YS, Jung IY, Lee SJ. Failure of setting of mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of fetal bovine serum and its prevention. J Endod. 2012;38:536–40.PubMed
19.
Kim D, Lee H, Chung M, Kim S, Song M, Kim E. Effect of Fast- and Slow-setting calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: a retrospective study up to 6 years.
20.
Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Endodontic surgery using 2 different magnification devices: preliminary results of a randomized controlled study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:235–42.PubMed
21.
Rahbaran S, Gilthorpe MS, Harrison SD, Gulabivala K. Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91:700–9.PubMed
22.
Tsesis I, Rosen E, Schwartz-Arad D, Fuss Z. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique. J Endod. 2006;32:412–6.PubMed
23.
Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod. 2009;35:930–7.PubMed
24.
• Tsesis I, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Rosen E. Outcome of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2009;35:1505–11 This manuscript is a systemic review assessing the outcome of endodontic surgery performed by modern technique, which consists of the use of magnification devices (loupe, endoscope, microscope). PubMed
25.
Wang N, Knight K, Dao T, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics-The Toronto Study. Phases I and II: apical surgery. J Endod. 2004;30:751–61.PubMed
26.
Zuolo ML, Ferreira MO, Gutmann JL. Prognosis in periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study. Int Endod J. 2000;33:91–8.PubMed
27.
Lindeboom JA, Frenken JW, Kroon FH, van den Akker HP. A comparative prospective randomized clinical study of MTA and IRM as root-end filling materials in single-rooted teeth in endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:495–500.PubMed
28.
von Arx T, Frei C, Bornstein MM. Periradicular surgery with and without endoscopy: a prospective clinical comparative study. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2003;113:860–5.
29.
Caliskan. Nonsurgical retreatment of teeth with periapical lesions previously managed by either endodontic or surgical intervention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:242–8.PubMed
30.
Fava LRG. Calcium hydroxide in endodontic retreatment after two nonsurgical and two surgical failures: report of a case. Int Endod J. 2001;34:72–80.PubMed
31.
Schwartz-Arad D, Yarom N, Lustig JP, Kaffe I. A retrospective radiographic study of root-end surgery with amalgam and intermediate restorative material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:472–7.PubMed
32.
Peterson J, Gutmann JL. The outcome of endodontic resurgery: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2001;34:169–75.PubMed
33.
Gagliani MM, Gorni FG, Strohmenger L. Periapical resurgery versus periapical surgery: a 5-year longitudinal comparison. Int Endod J. 2005;38:320–7.PubMed
34.
• Kim D, Kim S, Song M, Kang DR, Kohli MR, Kim E. Outcome of endodontic micro-resurgery: a retrospective study based on propensity score-matched survival analysis. J Endod. 2018;44:1632–40 This manuscript evaluated the outcome of endodontic micro re-surgery via the analysis of long-term clinical data and compare the findings with those for primary endodontic microsurgery by using propensity score-matched survival analysis. PubMed
35.
Bahcall JK, Di Fiore PM, Poulakidas TK. An endoscopic technique for endodontic surgery. J Endod. 1999;25:132–5.PubMed
36.
Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein R. Endoscopic periradicular surgery: a prospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:242–4.PubMed
37.
Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein R. Microscope versus endoscope in root-end management: a randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:1022–6.PubMed
38.
von Arx T, Hanni S, Jensen SS. Correlation of bone defect dimensions with healing outcome one year after apical surgery. J Endod. 2007;33:1044–8.
39.
von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hanni S. Clinical and radiographic assessment of various predictors for healing outcome 1 year after periapical surgery. J Endod. 2007;33:123–8.
40.
Lustmann J, Friedman S, Shaharabany V. Relation of pre- and intraoperative factors to prognosis of posterior apical surgery. J Endod. 1991;17:239–41.PubMed
41.
Jensen SS, Nattestad A, Egdo P, Sewerin I, Munksgaard EC, Schou S. A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study of resin composite and glass ionomer cement for retrograde root filling. Clin Oral Investig. 2002;6:236–43.PubMed
42.
Wang Q, Cheung GSP, Ng RPY. Survival of surgical endodontic treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital: a cohort study. Int Endod J. 2004;37:764–75.PubMed
43.
Barone C, Dao TT, Basrani BB, Wang N, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phases 3, 4, and 5: apical surgery. J Endod. 2010;36:28–35.PubMed
44.
von Arx T, Penarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36:957–73.
45.
Rapp EL, Brown CE Jr, Newton CW. An analysis of success and failure of apicoectomies. J Endod. 1991;17:508–12.PubMed
46.
Duncan HF, Pitt Ford TR. The potential association between smoking and endodontic disease. Int Endod J. 2006;39:843–54.PubMed
47.
Castillo RC, Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Patterson BM. Impact of smoking on fracture healing and risk of complications in limb-threatening open tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:151–7.PubMed
48.
W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S. Cigarette smoking delays bone healing: a prospective study of 200 patients operated on by the hemicallotasis technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:347–51.PubMed
49.
Chang LD, Buncke G, Slezak S, Buncke HJ. Cigarette smoking, plastic surgery, and microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;12:467–74.PubMed
50.
Testori T, Capelli M, Milani S, Weinstein RL. Success and failure in periradicular surgery: a longitudinal retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87:493–8.PubMed
51.
Maddalone M, Gagliani M. Periapical endodontic surgery: a 3-year follow-up study. Int Endod J. 2003;36:193–8.PubMed
52.
Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Endodontic surgery with ultrasonic retrotips: one-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:380–7.PubMed
53.
Friedman S. The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgery. Endod Top. 2005;11:219–62.
54.
• Kim S, Jung H, Kim S, et al. The influence of an isthmus on the coutcomes of surgically treated molars: a retrospective study. J Endod. 2016;42:1029–34 This manuscript studied the influence of an isthmus on the outcomes of microsurgery in molars. PubMed
55.
Kim S, Park S, Lee Y, Lee C-J, Karabucak B, Kim H-C, et al. Stress analyses of retrograde cavity preparation designs for surgical endodontics in the mesial root of the madibular molar: a finite element anlaysis-part I. J Endod. 2019;45:442–6.PubMed
56.
Nair PN. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J. 2006;39:249–81.PubMed
57.
Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics - The Toronto Study. Phase II: Initial treatment. J Endod. 2004;30:302–9.PubMed
58.
Hirsch JM, Ahlstrom U, Henrikson PA, Heyden G, Peterson LE. Periapical surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1979;8:173–85.PubMed
59.
Skoglund A, Persson G. A follow-up study of apicoectomized teeth with total loss of the buccal bone plate. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;59:78–81.PubMed
60.
Forssell H, Tammisalo T, Forssell K. A follow-up study of apicectomized teeth. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1988;84:85–93.PubMed
61.
Friedman S. Treatment outcome and prognosis of endodontic therapy. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell Science.
62.
Douthitt JC, Gutmann JL, Witherspoon DE. Histologic assessment of healing after the use of a bioresorbable membrane in the management of buccal bone loss concomitant with periradicular surgery. J Endod. 2001;27:404–10.PubMed
63.
Britain SK, von Arx T, Schenk RK, Buser D, Nummikoski P, Cochran DL. The use of guided tissue regeneration principles in endodontic surgery for induced chronic periodontic-endodontic lesions: a clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation. J Periodontol. 2005;76:450–60.PubMed
64.
Dietrich T, Zunker P, Dietrich D, Bernimoulin JP. Periapical and periodontal healing after osseous grafting and guided tissue regeneration treatment of apicomarginal defects in periradicular surgery: results after 12 months. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:474–82.PubMed
65.
Marin-Botero ML, Dominguez-Mejia JS, Arismendi-Echavarria JA, Mesa-Jaramillo AL, Florez-Moreno GA, Tobon-Arroyave SI. Healing response of apicomarginal defects to two guided tissue regeneration techniques in periradicular surgery: a double-blind, randomized-clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2006;39:368–77.PubMed
66.
Song M, Kim SG, Shin S-J, Kim H-C, Kim E. The influence of bone tissue deficiency on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: a prospective study. J Endod. 2013;39:1341–5.PubMed
67.
Kim D, Ku H, Nam T, Yoon T-C, Lee C-Y, Kim E. Influence of size and volume of periapical lesions on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: 3-dimensional analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2016;42:1196–201.PubMed
68.
Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endod. 1993;19:591–5.PubMed
69.
Torabinejad M, Rastegar AF, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21:109–12.PubMed
70.
Torabinejad M, Smith PW, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR. Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root-end filling materials. J Endod. 1995;21:295–9.PubMed
71.
Bates CF, Carnes DL, del Rio CE. Longitudinal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. J Endod. 1996;22:575–8.PubMed
72.
Pichardo MR, George SW, Bergeron BE, Jeansonne BG, Rutledge R. Apical leakage of root-end placed SuperEBA, MTA, and Geristore restorations in human teeth previously stored in 10% formalin. J Endod. 2006;32:956–9.PubMed
73.
Dorn SO, Gartner AH. Retrograde filling materials: a retrospective success-failure study of amalgam, EBA, and IRM. J Endod. 1990;16:391–3.PubMed
74.
von Arx T, Hanni S, Jensen SS. Clinical results with two different methods of root-end preparation and filling in apical surgery: mineral trioxide aggregate and adhesive.
75.
Andreasen JO, Munksgaard EC, Fredebo L, Rud J. Periodontal tissue regeneration including cementogenesis adjacent to dentin-bonded retrograde composite fillings in humans. J Endod. 1993;19:151–3.PubMed
76.
Rud J, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, Rud V. Retrograde root filling with composite and a dentin-bonding agent. 2. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991;7:126–31.PubMed
77.
Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2011;37:895–902.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Endodontic microsurgery: outcomes and prognostic factors
verfasst von
Euiseong Kim
Yaelim Kim
Publikationsdatum
16.11.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Current Oral Health Reports / Ausgabe 4/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-3002
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-019-00240-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Current Oral Health Reports 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Modern Approaches to Endodontics (S Kim and B Karabucak, Section Editors)

Beyond Endodontic MicroSurgery 1: Intentional Replantation

Modern Production Laboratory Advances in Dental Technology (M Bergler and E Steger, Section Editors)

Functional Aesthetics in Implantology and Reconstructive Dentistry: Analysis and Transfer of Referenced Individual Patient Information With the PlaneSystem®

Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan and P Cesar, Section Editors)

Digital Scanning in Modern Orthodontics

Modern Approaches to Endodontics (S Kim and B Karabucak, Section Editors)

Irrigation in Endodontics: a Review

Dental Restorative Materials (M Özcan and P Cesar, Section Editor)

Biological Communications Between Implants and Periodontal Tissues

Modern Production Laboratory Advances in Dental Technology (M Bergler and E Steger, Section Editors)

Factors Affecting the Marginal Fit of CAD-CAM Restorations and Concepts to Improve Outcomes

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

11.04.2024 | Endokarditis | Nachrichten

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

08.04.2024 | Zahnmedizin | Nachrichten

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

11.03.2024 | Kinderzahnmedizin | Nachrichten

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt
weitere anzeigen

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise