Background
Tuberculosis (TB) predominately presents with pulmonary disease, although extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB) is not uncommon [
1]. Genitourinary TB, comprising about 30% of all TB, is the second most common form of extrapulmonary TB [
2]. The prevalence of FGTB increases in countries with a high burden of high Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB). Five to 13% of all PTB patients develop GTB [
3].
In addition to the subtle presentation of the disease, the low sensitivity and specificity of routine diagnostic methods and the paucity of the organism in clinical samples are the main factors for the lower detection of genital TB (GTB) [
4]. Therefore, the use of advanced techniques such as PCR as part of diagnosis is crucial in defining the magnitude of the problem and alerting early investigation, before serious complications occur. Most cases of GTB are secondary to gastrointestinal TB spreading to the fallopian tubes causing TB salpingitis. Further spread of the organism involves the uterine endometrium (50%), ovaries (10–30%), cervix (3%), and vagina and vulva (< 1%) [
5]. The most frequent symptom of FGTB is infertility, as a result of irreversible damage to the fallopian tube [
6]. TB salpingitis and endometritis are responsible for 5 to 20% of all causes of infertility [
7,
8], and up to 39–41%in women with tubal factor infertility. Peritubal adhesions and pelvic masses were detected in most patients with GTB [
9]. Women with GTB have a low fertility rate varying from 16 to 38.2% [
6,
9]. Although most cases of GTB are asymptomatic, chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, menstrual irregularities, low grade fever, loss of weight and appetite, and tubo-ovarian masses are manifestations of GTB [
10,
11]. Depending upon the damage to the uterine cavity and the endometrium, uterine tuberculosis can be described as mild, moderate, or severe [
9].
Based on the epidemiology of TB and Ethiopia being one of the high TB burden countries, FGTB could also be a common gynecologic problem in Ethiopia. However, there is limited information on the epidemiology of FGTB in general and endometrial TB in particular, in Ethiopia. Studying the concordance of the different laboratory tests with clinical diagnosis is very important to choose the method with better sensitivity. The main purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of endometrial tuberculosis and to characterize isolates among patients undergoing endometrial biopsy for histo-pathological examination, for gynecologic diseases, at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, using culture and PCR techniques, and to compare the three methods.
Discussion
In this population of women who underwent endometrial biopsy for different gynecologic indications, it was found that the prevalence of endometrial TB was 4.6% by PCR, 2.6% by culture and 1.3% by histopathologic examination, showing a high prevalence rate similar to communities with a high overall TB prevalence rate [
7‐
11,
15]. Since only endometrial samples were studied this will underestimate the prevalence and may not give the full picture about the occurrence of female genital TB. A similar study in India on general gynecological admissions identified 2.8% of GTB and 7.2% from infertile cases with a gynecological problem, with the help of a simplified TB algorithm [
16]. The inclusion of mycobacteriological tests and molecular techniques could account for the higher report in our study though India is among the high TB burden countries.
Most studies in Africa and other Asian countries have given attention only to infertile women in order to assess the contribution of GTB to infertility, to understand the related clinical signs and symptoms and the consequence of treatment on conceiving. Our study identified endometrial TB in 6.7% of patients with chronic pelvic pain, 7.7% of women who had a problem of conception and in 13.8% of women who underwent endometrial biopsy as part of an infertility workup. A report from Tyerberg Hospital of South Africa, a country with a higher TB burden than Ethiopia, showed an incidence of 6% culture positive GTB in an infertile population [
17]. A similar study conducted in India using hysterosalpinography [HSG] identified 6.3% GTB from all patients who underwent through the procedure which is in agreement with our study [
18]. Similar to studies done in India, all positive cases were in the reproductive age group [
19‐
21].
Of 152 women studied, 112 had one or another form of menstrual abnormality. Endometrial TB was detected in 2.8% of women with menstrual abnormality, similar to another study [
22].
Literature reveals that
M. tuberculosis is the most predominant species among the MTC species [
23]. Similarly, in the present study, all isolates except one were confirmed as
M. tuberculosis by deletion typing. One isolate, which was not in the genus
Mycobacterium, could be an organism such as
Actinomycesor
Nocardia, that are known to cause pulmonary, cutaneous and sub-cutaneous diseases. They are acid fast by Ziehl Neelson staining, as is
Rhodococcus equi, that causes pneumonia and is an acid fast cocco bacillus [
24,
25]. Active GTB diagnosis was suggested by characteristic features of HSG, evidence of calcification/ complex adnoxal mass by scan, and the contact history of the patients. As a result, six patients were identified with possible GTB and two were positive for endometrial TB. One patient was positive by culture, IS1081-PCR and histology, but the other was detected only by IS1081-PCR. The overall kappa agreement, between clinical criteria and culture and/or IS1081 and culture only was found to be 0.28 and 0.17 respectively. Endometrial TB was more prevalent in patients not suspected of GTB (71.4%). This could be due to latent infection, when women are still asymptomatic, with low number of bacilli, and before structural damage to the tubes has taken place.
Rapid diagnosis and treatment of EPTB is required to lessen morbidity and mortality due to TB. It is crucial to have a sensitive and specific methodology for the diagnosis of TB in biopsies from genital organs in order to manage the disease easily. Different researchers have evaluated the performance of PCR compared to the conventional culture method in the diagnosis of TB from body fluid and biopsies. However, the primers used and the nature of the sample determines its sensitivity and specificity. In our findings, all culture positive samples (4/4) were also positive by IS1081-PCR with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 100, 98, 57 and 100% respectively. Other researchers who evaluated IS1081-PCR from lymph node [
26] and plural effusion [
27] showed that the sensitivity was 91 and 84.6% respectively. Positive agreement between culture and IS1081-PCR was observed as 0.718, indicating good agreement. In contrast, Derese et al. reported 23.4% sensitivity on comparison of IS1081-PCR with standard culture from lymph node [
28]. It is likely that the increased sensitivity of IS1081-PCR in our results reflects the small number of culture positive samples, good lysis of the mycobacterial cell wall and dissociation of DNA from particulate matter in the crude homogenate, allowing the recovery of supernatant after centrifugation and sufficient sample for extraction. The three (2%) culture negative but IS1081-PCR positive samples may be discrepant due to the presence of dead bacilli caused by storage or decontamination, and/or the absence or few bacteria in the culture sample.
Histopathology examination (HPE) is easy, quick and cheap. It is routinely used for the diagnosis of GTB, providing characteristic features of
M. tuberculosis [
29]. The primary aim of sample collection in this study was to examine HPE using haematoxylin and eosin staining for routine diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Accordingly, two (1.3%) samples were positive for endometrial tuberculosis. One sample gave a concordant result with both culture and IS1081-PCR, but the other was negative by both methods. The agreement between culture and histopathology was found to be 0.321. A study in India [
19] revealed that histopathology was more sensitive (6.9 Vs. 5.6), when compared against clinical criteria that indicated probable GTB, using HSG, laparascopy, ultrasound and other hematological tests. The possible reasons for the lower sensitivity of HPE in the present study could be the cyclical shedding of the endometrium that does not allow granuloma formation. Also, the sampled site may not represent the infected area.
The limitations of this study include the relatively small number of genital tuberculosis patients, which resulted in an inability to assess the sensitivity and accuracy of the different methods to diagnose female genital TB. Moreover, we included all patients for whom endometrial biopsy was requested for different indications and only endometrial samples were studied which might underestimate the prevalence and not give the full picture about the occurrence of female genital TB.
Conclusions
The present finding of a 4.6% EPTB prevalence is alarming, especially its widespread distribution throughout the population. Similar to pulmonary and other extra-pulmonary TB, the causative agent of GTB was found to be M. tuberculosis in this study. Most patients positive for endometrial TB were not suspected by physical examination using clinical criteria. In the diagnosis of endometrial TB, IS1081-PCR was more sensitive and specific than histology or culture, even though culture is regarded as the gold standard. Therefore, using IS1081-PCR and/or culture for screening of GTB could greatly improve the sensitivity of diagnosing FGTB.