Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2008

01.01.2008

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases

verfasst von: K.-M. Chiu, C.-L. Chen, S.-H. Chu, T.-Y. Lin

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein is a relatively new technique developed to minimize the wound and postoperative complications. This technique has gained patients’ acceptance and become popular in cardiac surgical practices. Because most centers have limited experience with this approach, the authors summarize the clinical profiles of patients undergoing endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH).

Methods

Between March 2001 and August 2006, 1,348 patients (945 men and 403 women) with a mean age of 67.2 years (range, 28–89 years) underwent EVH of saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery, peripheral artery reconstruction, and miscellaneous conditions. The EVH technique was performed using the Vasoview system (Guidant, Menlo Park, CA, USA) under the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 98.6% of the cases. Two saphenous veins were discarded because of obvious vein injury. The mean harvest time was 45 min: 68 min for the first 50 cases and 23 min for the last 200 cases. Nearly all the patients (98%) had saphenous vein harvested only from the thighs, whereas only 1.5% of the patients had saphenous vein harvested from the legs. Postoperative wound complications were experienced by 61 patients including 25 tract hematomas, 19 wound dehiscences or poor healing, 16 wound infections, and 1 overlying skin necrosis. Overall, 13 subsequent revisions were required for these complications. Detectable air embolisms occurred for 143 patients and numbness in the saphenous nerve territory for 169 patients.

Conclusion

The findings showed EVH of saphenous vein to be a valid alternative to open saphenectomy, providing excellent surgical results. Therefore, EVH should be considered as the standard of care for saphenous vein harvest.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Seabolt PB, Reardon MJ (2003) Endoscopic vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 18:444–446PubMedCrossRef Seabolt PB, Reardon MJ (2003) Endoscopic vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 18:444–446PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bitondo JM, Daggett WM, Torchiana DF, Akins CW, Hilgenberg AD, Vlahakes GJ, Madsen JC, MacGillivray TE, Agnihotri AK (2002) Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg 73:523–528PubMedCrossRef Bitondo JM, Daggett WM, Torchiana DF, Akins CW, Hilgenberg AD, Vlahakes GJ, Madsen JC, MacGillivray TE, Agnihotri AK (2002) Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg 73:523–528PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE (2001) Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716–719PubMedCrossRef Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE (2001) Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716–719PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212PubMedCrossRef Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O, Kadner A, Mader M, Seiffert B, Hoerstrup SP, Zünd G, Genoni M, Turina MI (2002) Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG: a randomized, prospective trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50:160–163PubMedCrossRef Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O, Kadner A, Mader M, Seiffert B, Hoerstrup SP, Zünd G, Genoni M, Turina MI (2002) Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG: a randomized, prospective trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50:160–163PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Felisky CD, Paull DL, Hill ME, Hall RA, Ditkoff M, Campbell WG, Guyton SW (2002) Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Surg 183:576–579PubMedCrossRef Felisky CD, Paull DL, Hill ME, Hall RA, Ditkoff M, Campbell WG, Guyton SW (2002) Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Surg 183:576–579PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB (2003) Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 6:E143–E145PubMed Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB (2003) Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 6:E143–E145PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB, Isch JH, Abraham S, Shaar CJ (2000) Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 3:325–330PubMed Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB, Isch JH, Abraham S, Shaar CJ (2000) Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 3:325–330PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffith GL, Allen KB, Waller BF, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Shaar CJ (2000) Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 69:520–523PubMedCrossRef Griffith GL, Allen KB, Waller BF, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Shaar CJ (2000) Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 69:520–523PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212PubMedCrossRef Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S (2005) Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:496–503PubMedCrossRef Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S (2005) Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:496–503PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrigus IE, Stockman B, Amsel BJ, Moulijn AC (2001) Should we use video-assisted endoscopic vein harvesting as a standard technique? Heart Surg Forum 4:53–55PubMed Rodrigus IE, Stockman B, Amsel BJ, Moulijn AC (2001) Should we use video-assisted endoscopic vein harvesting as a standard technique? Heart Surg Forum 4:53–55PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE (2001) Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716–719PubMedCrossRef Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE (2001) Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716–719PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin TY, Chiu KM, Wang MJ, Chu SH (2003) Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:2011–2015PubMedCrossRef Lin TY, Chiu KM, Wang MJ, Chu SH (2003) Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:2011–2015PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu KM, Lin TY, Wang MJ, Chu SJ (2006) Reduction of carbon dioxide embolism for endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1697–1699PubMedCrossRef Chiu KM, Lin TY, Wang MJ, Chu SJ (2006) Reduction of carbon dioxide embolism for endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1697–1699PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohn JD, Korver KF (2005) Optimizing saphenous vein site selection using intraoperative venous duplex ultrasound scanning. Ann Thorac Surg 79:2013–2017PubMedCrossRef Cohn JD, Korver KF (2005) Optimizing saphenous vein site selection using intraoperative venous duplex ultrasound scanning. Ann Thorac Surg 79:2013–2017PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander MJ, Perna J (2005) Endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvest for extracranial–intracranial bypass procedures. Surg Neurol 63:565–368PubMedCrossRef Alexander MJ, Perna J (2005) Endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvest for extracranial–intracranial bypass procedures. Surg Neurol 63:565–368PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Erdoes LS, Milner TP (2005) Encouraging results with endoscopic vein harvest for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 42:442–448PubMedCrossRef Erdoes LS, Milner TP (2005) Encouraging results with endoscopic vein harvest for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 42:442–448PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases
verfasst von
K.-M. Chiu
C.-L. Chen
S.-H. Chu
T.-Y. Lin
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9522-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.