Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2017

13.10.2017 | Original Article

Endoscopic Treatment Versus Esophagectomy for Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer: a Population-Based Study Using Propensity Score Matching

verfasst von: Yuan Zeng, Wenhua Liang, Jun Liu, Jianxing He

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic treatment (ET) is an alternative for selected patients with early-stage esophageal cancer. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) of such patients after ET or esophagectomy.

Methods

Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression analysis were used to compare OS and ECSS of 2661 patients with ET or esophagectomy for early-stage (Tis–T1N0M0) disease. Patient information was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Subgroup analyses by T stage and tumor histology were also performed.

Results

There were significant differences in age, sex ratio, year of diagnosis, cancer site, cancer stage, differentiation grade, tumor histology, tumor size, lymph nodes examined, and receipt of radiation therapy in the two treatment groups. PSM created 621 patient pairs. Multivariate analysis found no significant differences in OS (HR = 1.216, P = 0.279) or ECSS (HR = 0.692, P = 0.179) in the esophagectomy and ET groups. The results were similar for subgroup analyses limited to stage Tis, T1a, and T1b patients. ET was also associated with similar OS and ECSS in esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Conclusion

In this population-based study using PSM, patients with stage Tis and T1N0M0 esophageal cancer with ET had OS and ECSS comparable to those treated by esophagectomy after adjusting for clinical variables. The results support ET as an alternative to esophagectomy in early esophageal cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381(9864):400–412.CrossRefPubMed Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381(9864):400–412.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rice TW, Rusch VW, Ishwaran H, Blackstone EH. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals. Cancer. 2010;116(16):3763–3773.CrossRefPubMed Rice TW, Rusch VW, Ishwaran H, Blackstone EH. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals. Cancer. 2010;116(16):3763–3773.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. The New England journal of medicine. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. The New England journal of medicine. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin XF, Gai W, Chai TH, Li L, Guo JQ. Comparison of endoscopic resection and minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with early esophageal cancer. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2017;51(3):223–227.PubMed Jin XF, Gai W, Chai TH, Li L, Guo JQ. Comparison of endoscopic resection and minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with early esophageal cancer. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2017;51(3):223–227.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah PM, Gerdes H. Endoscopic options for early stage esophageal cancer. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2015;6(1):20–30.PubMedPubMedCentral Shah PM, Gerdes H. Endoscopic options for early stage esophageal cancer. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2015;6(1):20–30.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad GA, Wu TT, Wigle DA, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):815–823.CrossRefPubMed Prasad GA, Wu TT, Wigle DA, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):815–823.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett’s esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(2):312–319.e1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett’s esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(2):312–319.e1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pech O, Bollschweiler E, Manner H, Leers J, Ell C, Hölscher AH. Comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus at two high-volume centers. Annals of surgery. 2011;254(1):67–72.CrossRefPubMed Pech O, Bollschweiler E, Manner H, Leers J, Ell C, Hölscher AH. Comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus at two high-volume centers. Annals of surgery. 2011;254(1):67–72.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Das A, Singh V, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK. A comparison of endoscopic treatment and surgery in early esophageal cancer: an analysis of surveillance epidemiology and end results data. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2008;103(6):1340–1345.CrossRefPubMed Das A, Singh V, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK. A comparison of endoscopic treatment and surgery in early esophageal cancer: an analysis of surveillance epidemiology and end results data. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2008;103(6):1340–1345.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngamruengphong S, Wolfsen HC, Wallace MB. Survival of patients with superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma after endoscopic treatment vs surgery.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2013;11(11):1424–1429.e2; quiz e81.CrossRef Ngamruengphong S, Wolfsen HC, Wallace MB. Survival of patients with superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma after endoscopic treatment vs surgery.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2013;11(11):1424–1429.e2; quiz e81.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in medicine. 2008;27(12):2037–2049.CrossRefPubMed Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in medicine. 2008;27(12):2037–2049.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings LC, Kou TD, Schluchter MD, Chak A, Cooper GS. Outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2016;84(2):232–240. Cummings LC, Kou TD, Schluchter MD, Chak A, Cooper GS. Outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2016;84(2):232–240.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin DB, Thomas N. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics. 1996;52(1):249–264.CrossRefPubMed Rubin DB, Thomas N. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics. 1996;52(1):249–264.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Njei B, McCarty TR, Birk JW. Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: a SEER database analysis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2016;31(6):1141–1146. Njei B, McCarty TR, Birk JW. Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: a SEER database analysis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2016;31(6):1141–1146.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wani S, Drahos J, Cook MB, et al. Comparison of endoscopic therapies and surgical resection in patients with early esophageal cancer: a population-based study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2014;79(2):224–232.e1.CrossRefPubMed Wani S, Drahos J, Cook MB, et al. Comparison of endoscopic therapies and surgical resection in patients with early esophageal cancer: a population-based study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2014;79(2):224–232.e1.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bustamante FA, Hourneaux DEMEG, Bernardo W, Sallum RA, Ide E, Baba E. Surgery versus endoscopic therapies for early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in the esophagus: a systematic review. Arquivos de gastroenterologia. 2016;53(1):10–19.CrossRefPubMed Bustamante FA, Hourneaux DEMEG, Bernardo W, Sallum RA, Ide E, Baba E. Surgery versus endoscopic therapies for early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in the esophagus: a systematic review. Arquivos de gastroenterologia. 2016;53(1):10–19.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt HM, Mohiuddin K, Bodnar AM, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment of T1a adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: contemporary comparison of endoscopic and surgical treatment in physiologically fit patients. Surgical endoscopy. 2016;30(8):3391–3401.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt HM, Mohiuddin K, Bodnar AM, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment of T1a adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: contemporary comparison of endoscopic and surgical treatment in physiologically fit patients. Surgical endoscopy. 2016;30(8):3391–3401.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lyros O, Hansen T, Mildenberger P, Lang H. Detection of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2011;11(4):601–612.CrossRefPubMed Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lyros O, Hansen T, Mildenberger P, Lang H. Detection of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2011;11(4):601–612.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Manner H, Pech O, Heldmann Y, et al. Efficacy, safety, and long-term results of endoscopic treatment for early stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with low-risk sm1 invasion. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2013;11(6):630–635; quiz e45.CrossRef Manner H, Pech O, Heldmann Y, et al. Efficacy, safety, and long-term results of endoscopic treatment for early stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with low-risk sm1 invasion. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2013;11(6):630–635; quiz e45.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Endoscopic Treatment Versus Esophagectomy for Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer: a Population-Based Study Using Propensity Score Matching
verfasst von
Yuan Zeng
Wenhua Liang
Jun Liu
Jianxing He
Publikationsdatum
13.10.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3563-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.