Patients with distal esophageal pathology such as perforation, trachea-esophageal fistulae, and/ or obstructing gastroesophageal junction tumor present a challenging situation in terms of feeding access where an esophageal stent is placed across the gastroesophageal junction. In order to allow simultaneous gastric decompression and post-pyloric feeds without significant reflux up through the stent, a gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube is a viable option. We hereby describe a hybrid approach to placing these GJ tubes in this cohort of patients using simultaneous laparoscopy, endoscopy, and fluoroscopy with minimal manipulation of the stent itself. We have employed this technique of placing GJ tubes 2–3 days following placement of the esophageal stent in six consecutive patients. All patients tolerated the procedure well without any complications. Endoscopically guided laparoscopic GJ tubes are ideal for bridging patients, with distal esophageal pathology requiring esophageal stents, to oral intake.
Begleitmaterial
Video 1
Step-by-step technique for placement of endoscopically-guided laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube placement. (MOV 294688kb)
Hinweise
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11605-017-3379-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Introduction
The most common long-term route of enteral feeds is via a gastrostomy or a jejunostomy tube (G- or J-tube). However, there are clinical situations where a patient requires gastric decompression via a nasogastric tube or G-tube with simultaneous distal feeds. While nasoduodenal or nasojejunal tubes can be safely placed for post-pyloric feeds, they are notorious for getting displaced and/or clogged due to their small caliber,1,2 making discharging a patient home difficult. Additionally, while a J-tube could adequately provide distal enteral feeds, one would still require either a nasogastric tube or G-tube to vent the gastric cavity. In such cases, the nasogastric tube either crosses an indwelling stent which is not ideal or patients have two enteral accesses (G-tube to vent and J-tube for feeds since gastric feeds are not acceptable given risk of reflux through the esophageal stent). In such situations, a gastrojejunostomy (GJ) feeding tube is an ideal feeding access.
Historically, GJ feeding tubes have been placed at our institution in two phases for this select group of patients. First, a G-tube had to be placed endoscopically that potentially risked displacement of the esophageal stent and once the track matured after 10–14 days, interventional radiologists threaded a post-pyloric jejunal feeding tube under fluoroscopy through the G-tube or swapped it out for a GJ tube. However, this resulted in a delay in enteral nutrition, long-term dependence on parenteral nutrition with risk of line infection, and associated cholestasis, as well as prolonged hospital stay while the patient waited to have the jejunal extension placed.
Anzeige
Here, we present our hybrid technique where a GJ feeding tube is placed laparoscopically with simultaneous use of an endoscope. Since G-tubes are anecdotally better tolerated by patients than a J-tube in terms of tube dislodgment and obstruction,3,4 GJ tubes are an excellent alternative since they more or less behave as G tubes.
Technique
The procedure begins laparoscopically where one 12-mm peri-umbilical port is placed in the midline and two 5-mm ports are placed in the right upper quadrant and right lower quadrant. Endoscopy is performed once pneumoperitoneum is in place and a GJ tube insertion site is identified in the body of the stomach along the greater curvature. Using a stitch or T-fastener (Kimberly-Clark, Roswell, GA; surgeon preference), the stomach is stabilized while a large-bore needle is used to pass a guidewire into the gastric lumen (Fig. 1a). This wire is then grasped with an endoscopic forceps and guided post-pyloric into the proximal small bowel. The distal end of the wire is confirmed to be in the small bowel with on-table fluoroscopy (Fig. 1b). Next, an 18Fr GJ tube (Kimberly-Clark, Roswell, GA) is inserted using Seldinger technique with a 22Fr peel-away dilator sheath kit (Kimberly-Clark, Roswell, GA; Fig. 1c). The J-limb of the GJ tube is passed distally over the wire and confirmed to be in place using fluoroscopy (Fig. 1d). The anterior wall of the stomach is finally anchored to the abdominal wall in a Stamm gastrostomy fashion (Fig. 1e) and the gastric balloon is inflated against the abdominal wall (Fig. 1f). The gastric port is immediately placed on bedside gravity and the jejunal port can be used for enteral feeds the next day.
Fig. 1
Using a T-fastener, the stomach is stabilized while a large-bore needle is used to pass a guidewire into the gastric lumen (a). This wire is then guided post-pyloric into the proximal small bowel and confirmed to be in appropriate position with on-table fluoroscopy (b). Using a 22Fr peel-away dilator sheath (c), an 18Fr GJ tube is threaded into the stomach over the wire. The final position of the GJ tube is confirmed to be in place by injecting contrast into the J-port (d). The anterior wall of the stomach is then anchored to the abdominal wall (e), and the gastric balloon is inflated (f)
×
Patients
Patient selection is key. Most of the patients selected for this route of feeding had distal esophageal pathology who required esophageal stents precluding them from eating or getting gastric feeds that can reflux. Jejunal enteral feeds were a superior mode of nutrition for this cohort of patients, when compared to long-term parenteral route.
Results
As seen in Table 1, we performed this procedure consecutively on six patients over the last 6 months. All of them were either those who suffered from distal esophageal perforation and had esophageal stents placed crossing the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ, n = 3) or those with advanced esophageal or lung cancer with tracheoesophageal fistula requiring an esophageal stent (n = 2). One patient had developed an obstructing esophageal cancer at the GEJ 4 years after her bilateral lung transplant, who needed a palliative stent during definitive chemoradiation. All of them did well and only the three patients who suffered from spontaneous/iatrogenic distal esophageal perforation were able to get the GJ tube removed once their stents were removed and they were tolerating oral intake without any problems.
Table 1
Our experience: outcomes of patients undergoing gastrojejunostomy feeding tube placement
Age/Sex
Indication
Stent placed?
GJ tube removed?
74/F
Boerhaave syndrome; left thoracotomy, chest washout
Yes
Yes
41/M
Boerhaave syndrome; left thoracoscopic mediastinal washout
Yes
Yes
58/M
Stage IIIA lung cancer s/p adjuvant radiation only with recurrence in subcarinal region, then with chemoradiation, now with TEF and PEG tube
Yes
No
76/M
Stage IIIA lung cancer with subcarinal involvement with subsequent BPF and TEF, no neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiation
Yes
No
59/F
Newly diagnosed esophageal cancer and stricture, history of bilateral lung transplant 4 years ago
Yes
No
82/F
Iatrogenic esophageal perforation from TEE probe (during MVP)
After a median follow-up period of 8 months, of the six reported patients, none of them had a complication from the GJ tube itself, in terms of migration, occlusion, reflux, or dislodgement of the tube. Albeit, this is a very commonly noted problem of any J tube extension or J-limb of the GJ tube, which would require replacement of the GJ tube by interventional radiology. One patient succumbed to death given that she was end-stage esophageal cancer, status post bilateral lung transplant, and on immunosuppression; and the stent and feeding tube had been placed as palliation efforts.
Discussion
There are several notable advantages of this procedure. Firstly, both gastric decompression and post-pyloric feeds can be accomplished with one tube. Secondly, the tube is placed safely and under direct visualization in one stage. Lastly, given the large caliber of the tube, clogging of the tube is less of an issue and because it is not a tube-within-a-tube, no manipulation of the tube is required in the immediate post-placement period. These tubes can be easily exchanged over a wire by interventional radiology, if needed in case of clogged or dislodged tube. On the contrary, the procedure does require two competent operators to simultaneously perform the endoscopic driving of the wire into the small bowel while placing the GJ tube laparoscopically.
While this procedure is safe, patient selection is important. Patients who are not good candidates for general anesthesia, laparoscopy, or have difficult foregut anatomy should not undergo GJ tube placement and maybe better off with parenteral nutrition. Endoscopically guided laparoscopic GJ tubes are a viable option for patients who require both gastric decompression and post-pyloric feeds, and are ideal for bridging patients to oral intake.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author Contributions
Conception: PGK; Acquisition of data: MEN; Analysis of data: all authors; Writing: MEN, PGK; Critical revision: all authors; Final approval: all authors.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.
Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!
Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.
Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.
