The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1265-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The rate of elective Caesarean Section (CS) is rising in many countries. Many obstetric units in the UK have either introduced or are planning to introduce enhanced recovery (ER) as a means of reducing length of stay for planned CS. However, to date there has been very little evidence produced regarding the necessary components of ER for the obstetric population. We conducted a rapid review of the composition of published ER pathways for elective CS and undertook an umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluating ER components and pathways in any surgical setting.
Pathways were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the National Guideline Clearing House, appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool and their components tabulated. Systematic reviews were identified using the Cochrane Library and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and appraised using The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Two reviewers aggregated summaries of findings for Length of Stay (LoS).
Five clinical protocols were identified, involving a total of 25 clinical components; 3/25 components were common to all five pathways (early oral intake, mobilization and removal of urinary catheter). AGREE II scores were generally low. Systematic reviews of single components found that minimally invasive Joel-Cohen surgical technique, early catheter removal and post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis reduced LoS after CS most significantly by around half to 1 and a half days. Ten meta-analyses of multi-component Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) packages demonstrated reductions in LoS of between 1 and 4 days. The quality of evidence was mostly low or moderate.
Further research is needed to develop, using formal methods, and evaluate pathways for enhanced recovery in elective CS. Appropriate quality improvement packages are needed to optimise their implementation.
Additional file 1: MEDLINE Search Strategy. This file provides a reproduction of the search strategy used in the MEDLINE search. (PDF 12 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Additional file 2: Figure S1. Eligible studies for ERAS packages in elective caesarean. Flow diagram of the study selection process for ERAS packages in elective caesarean. (PDF 33 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Additional file 3: Figure S2. Eligible systematic reviews for ERAS components and packages in any setting. Flow diagram of the study selection process for ERAS components and packages in any setting. (PDF 36 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Additional file 4: Table S1. Excluded studies. Table listing the studies found to be ineligible at full reading (ERAS components and packages in any setting). (PDF 10 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Additional file 5: Table S2. Components of pathways for enhanced recovery after elective CS. Table listing the various enhanced recovery components found in the included studies. (PDF 22 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
Additional file 6: Table S3. Outcomes reported by systematic reviews of components and pathways for ERAS. Table listing the various outcomes from the included studies, presented by category and in specific detail. (PDF 57 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM6_ESM.pdf
Additional file 7: Table S4. AGREE II criteria for assessing quality of studies of proposed ERAS packages in elective caesarean. Table presenting the results of the quality assessment undertaken in terms of risk of bias of the included studies (ERAS packages in elective caesarean). (PDF 22 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM7_ESM.pdf
Additional file 8: Table 5. Aggregate Summary of Findings table. Table presenting the summary of findings from the included studies (ERAS components and packages in any setting). (PDF 57 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM8_ESM.pdf
Additional file 9: Table 6. AMSTAR Assessment. Table presenting the results of the quality assessment undertaken in terms of risk of bias of the included studies (ERAS components and packages in any setting). (PDF 45 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM9_ESM.pdf
Additional file 10: Figure S3. Proposed mechanisms of action for broad categories of ERAS components. Figure illustrating how the proposed mechanisms of action may work in an enhanced recovery pathway. (PDF 212 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM10_ESM.pdf
Additional file 11: Table S7. Interventions, mechanisms and actions. Table detailing the theory of the proposed mechanisms of action in an enhanced recovery pathway. (PDF 22 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM11_ESM.pdf
Additional file 12: Table S8. Proposed barriers and facilitators of uptake. Table detailing the barriers and facilitators of adoption of healthcare innovations. (PDF 19 kb)12884_2017_1265_MOESM12_ESM.pdf
Health and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics: NHS Maternity Statistics - 2012–13. Health and Social Care Information Centre. 2013. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB12744/nhs-mate-eng-2012-13-summ-repo-rep.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2015.
Kitching AJ, O’Neill SS. Fast-track surgery and anaesthesia. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9(2):39–43. CrossRef
Niranjan N, Bolton T, Berry C. Enhanced recovery after surgery – current trends in perioperative care. Updat Anaesth. 2010;26(1):18–23.
Melnyk M, Casey RG, Black P, Koupparis AJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice? J Can Urol Assoc. 2011;5(5):342–8. CrossRef
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean Section - NICE Clinical Guideline 132. London: NICE; 2012.
Kelliher L, Jones C, Day A. Optimising perioperative patient care: “enhanced recovery” following colorectal surgery. J Perioper Pract. 2011;21(7):239–43. PubMed
Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P, Eastwood A, Craig D, Fox D, et al. Initiatives to reduce length of stay in acute hospital settings: a rapid synthesis of evidence relating to enhanced recovery programmes. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2(21).
Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb N. Intervention Mapping: Designing Theory and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs. Mountain View: Mayfield; 2001.
D’Onofrio CN, Program N, Tool P. Pooling Information About Prior Interventions: A New Program Planning Tool. In: Sussman S, editor. Handbook of Program Development for Health Behavior Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2001. p. 158–204.
Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, King-Jones S, Ishaque S, Bhaloo Z, et al. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “core outcome set”. Trials. 2014;15:247. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P, Eastwood A, Craig D, Fox D, et al. Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005015.
Halder S, Onwere C, Brennan C, Singh N, Cox M, Yentis S. PA.07 Enhanced recovery programme for elective caesarean section. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:A19. CrossRef
Damluji N, Maclennan K, Jamieson K, Tower C. PA.15 Enhanced Recovery in Elective Caesarean section: early experience suggests reduced length of stay. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:A21. CrossRef
Abell D, Long O, Giarenis I, Cameron S, Davidson C, Penna L, et al. A2102 Enhanced Recovery in Obstetric Surgery (EROS) - The First UK Established Programme (Conference abstract). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 2013 Annual Meeting. San Francisco: 2013.
Abell D, Pool AW, Sharafudeen S, Skelton V, J D, I F. Enhanced recovery in obstetric surgery (Kings-EROS): early results from one of the UKs first programmes: 11AP5-10. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:192.
Long O, Garratt EC, Jan H, Blightman O, Sharafudeen S, Dasan J, et al. O5: Audit of maternal outcomes following introduction of an enhanced recovery in obstetric surgery (EROS) protocol for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;22:S8.
Munday J, Hines S, Wallace K, Chang AM, Gibbons K, Yates P. The clinical effectiveness of interventions to assist perioperative temperature management for women undergoing cesarean section: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2013;11(6):45–111. CrossRef
Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, Herbison GP, Soop M, Nygren J. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD009161.
Burden S, Todd C, Hill J, Lal S. Pre-operative nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008879. PubMed
Mathai M, Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai NE. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD004453.
Alderson P, Campbell G, Smith AF, Warttig S, Nicholson A, Lewis SR. Thermal insulation for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD009908.
Rabe H, Diaz-Rossello JL, Duley L, Dowswell T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD003248.
Smaill FM, Gyte GM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD007482.
Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ. Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;3:CD003516.
Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD004080.
Abdel-Aleem H, Aboelnasr MF, Jayousi TM, Habib FA. Indwelling bladder catheterisation as part of intraoperative and postoperative care for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD010322.
Billson HA, Holland C, Curwell J, Davey VL, Kinsey L, Lawton LJ, et al. Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD009884.
Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S, Grivell RM. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD004732.
Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD003577. PubMed
McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD004074.
Urrútia G, M RF, Jm C, Paniagua P, S CS, Maestre L, et al. Active warming systems for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD009016
Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD000163.
Afolabi BB, Lesi FEA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD004350. PubMed
Charoenkwan K, Phillipson G, Vutyavanich T. Early versus delayed (traditional) oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD004508.
Kagedan DJ, Ahmed M, Devitt KS, Wei AC. Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(1):11–6. CrossRef
Hughes MJ, McNally S, Wigmore SJ. Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(8):699–706. CrossRef
Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD007635.
Coolsen MME, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K, et al. A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(4):245–51. CrossRef
Lv D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:CD008239.
Sturm L, Cameron AL. Brief Review: Fast-Track Surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Programs (ASERNIP-S Report No. 74). Adelaide, South Australia: Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures – Surgical (ASERNIP-S). 2009. https://www.surgeons.org/media/299206/RPT_2009-12-09_Enhanced_Patient_Recovery_Programs.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.
Sia AT, Tan KH, Sng BL, Lim Y, Chan ESY, Siddiqui FJ. Use of hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD005143.
Jacobs-Jokhan D, Hofmeyr G. Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:CD000085.
Becker GE, Remmington S, Remmington T. Early additional food and fluids for healthy breastfed full-term infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD006462.
Palethorpe RJ, Farrar D, Duley L. Alternative positions for the baby at birth before clamping the umbilical cord. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10:CD007555.
Mallidou A. Mapping the landscape of knowledge synthesis. Nurs Manage. 2014;21(5):30–9. CrossRef
Becker LA, Oxman AD. Chapter 22: Overview of reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0) [updated March 2011]. 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration.
Hind D, Corso E, Wilson M, Wrench I, Chambers D. Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: protocol for a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews. PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014458. 2014. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014014458. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.
Gunnarsdottir J, Bjornsdottir TE, Halldorsson TI, Halldorsdottir G, Geirsson RT. Shortened hospital stay for elective cesarean section after initiation of a fast-track program and midwifery home-care. Laeknabladid. 2011;97(7–8):407–12. PubMed
Pearse R, Everingham K. Protocol 13PRT/7655:Enhanced PeriOperative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH) Trial (ISRCTN80682973). The Lancet. 2013. http://www.thelancet.com/doi/story/ 10.1016/html.2014.12.08.1621. Accessed November 19, 2015
Wainwright T, Middleton R. An orthopaedic enhanced recovery pathway. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2010;21(3):114–20. CrossRef
McGeehan R. Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedics – The Journey. Sheffield: Sheffield Teaching Hospitals; 2013.
- Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews
Matthew J. Wilson
Ian J. Wrench
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II