Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
World Journal of Surgery
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2017

07.11.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Christine S. M. Lau, Ronald S. Chamberlain

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been developed to improve patient outcomes, accelerate recovery after surgery, and reduce healthcare costs. ERAS programs are a multimodal approach, with interventions during all stages of care. This meta-analysis examines the impact of ERAS programs on patient outcomes and recovery.

Methods

A comprehensive search of all published randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing the use of ERAS programs in surgical patients was conducted. Outcomes analyzed were length of stay (LOS), overall mortality, 30-day readmission rates, total costs, total complications, time to first flatus, and time to first bowel movement.

Results

Forty-two RCTs involving 5241 patients were analyzed. ERAS programs significantly reduced LOS, total complications, and total costs across all types of surgeries (p < 0.001). Return of gastrointestinal (GI) function was also significantly improved, as measured by earlier time to first flatus and time to first bowel movement, p < 0.001. There was no overall difference in mortality or 30-day readmission rates; however, 30-day readmission rates after upper GI surgeries nearly doubled with the use of ERAS programs (RR = 1.922; p = 0.019).

Conclusions

ERAS programs are associated with a significant reduction in LOS, total complications, total costs, as well as earlier return of GI function. Overall mortality and readmission rates remained similar, but there was a significant increase in 30-day readmission rates after upper GI surgeries. ERAS programs are effective and a valuable part in improving patient outcomes and accelerating recovery after surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Rose J, Weiser TG, Hider P, Wilson L, Gruen RL, Bickler SW (2015) Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health 3(Suppl 2):S13–S20CrossRefPubMed
2.
Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von MM, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24(3):466–477CrossRefPubMed
3.
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440CrossRefPubMed
6.
Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, Lewis SR, Alderson P, Smith AF (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101(3):172–188CrossRefPubMed
7.
Carli F (2015) Physiologic considerations of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs: implications of the stress response. Can J Anaesth 62(2):110–119CrossRefPubMed
8.
Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, Mayo NE, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM et al (2014) Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg 101(3):159–170CrossRefPubMed
9.
Feldman LS, Lee L, Fiore J Jr (2015) What outcomes are important in the assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways? Can J Anaesth 62(2):120–130CrossRefPubMed
10.
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):801–816CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Lei QC, Wang XY, Zheng HZ, Xia XF, Bi JC, Gao XJ et al (2015) laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection within fast track programs: an Update meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med Res 7(8):594–601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Bu J, Li N, Huang X, He S, Wen J, Wu X (2015) Feasibility of fast-track surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19(8):1391–1398CrossRefPubMed
14.
Wang H, Zhu D, Liang L, Ye L, Lin Q, Zhong Y et al (2015) Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management. Qual Life Res 24(11):2663–2670CrossRefPubMed
15.
Wu CL, Benson AR, Hobson DB, Roda CP, Demski R, Galante DJ et al (2015) Initiating an enhanced recovery pathway program: an anesthesiology department’s perspective. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 41(10):447–456CrossRefPubMed
16.
Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, Aarts MA, McKenzie M, McLeod RS et al (2015) A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 261(1):92–96CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Thompson L, Hill AG (2009) Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg 7(1):16–19CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hughes M, Coolsen MM, Aahlin EK, Harrison EM, McNally SJ, Dejong CH et al (2015) Attitudes of patients and care providers to enhanced recovery after surgery programs after major abdominal surgery. J Surg Res 193(1):102–110CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S, Griesser AC, Blanc C, Hubner M et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100(8):1108–1114CrossRefPubMed
21.
Stowers MD, Lemanu DP, Hill AG (2015) Health economics in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs. Can J Anaesth 62(2):219–230CrossRefPubMed
22.
Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio RC, Hobson D, Pawlik T, Wu CL et al (2016) Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experiences at a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):219–225CrossRefPubMed
23.
Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ (2003) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 90(12):1497–1504CrossRefPubMed
24.
Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):851–859CrossRefPubMed
25.
Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy BS, Hayward-Sampson P, Tring IC, MacFie J (2005) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 92(11):1354–1362CrossRefPubMed
26.
Recart A, Duchene D, White PF, Thomas T, Johnson DB, Cadeddu JA (2005) Efficacy and safety of fast-track recovery strategy for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol 19(10):1165–1169CrossRefPubMed
27.
Petersen MK, Madsen C, Andersen NT, Soballe K (2006) Efficacy of multimodal optimization of mobilization and nutrition in patients undergoing hip replacement: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50(6):712–717CrossRefPubMed
28.
Gralla O, Haas F, Knoll N, Hadzidiakos D, Tullmann M, Romer A et al (2007) Fast-track surgery in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: basic principles. World J Urol 25(2):185–191CrossRefPubMed
29.
Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245(6):867–872CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Larsen K, Sorensen OG, Hansen TB, Thomsen PB, Soballe K (2008) Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: a randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up. Acta Orthop 79(2):149–159CrossRefPubMed
31.
Muehling BM, Halter GL, Schelzig H, Meierhenrich R, Steffen P, Sunder-Plassmann L et al (2008) Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(1):174–180CrossRefPubMed
32.
Borgwardt L, Zerahn B, Bliddal H, Christiansen C, Sylvest J, Borgwardt A (2009) Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: a randomized, controlled study of 40 patients. Acta Orthop 80(3):334–337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Ionescu D, Iancu C, Ion D, Al-Hajjar N, Margarit S, Mocan L et al (2009) Implementing fast-track protocol for colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 33(11):2433–2438. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-009-0197-x CrossRefPubMed
34.
Muehling B, Schelzig H, Steffen P, Meierhenrich R, Sunder-Plassmann L, Orend KH (2009) A prospective randomized trial comparing traditional and fast-track patient care in elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair. World J Surg 33(3):577–585. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-008-9892-2 CrossRefPubMed
35.
Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136(3):842–847CrossRefPubMed
36.
Serclova Z, Dytrych P, Marvan J, Nova K, Hankeova Z, Ryska O et al (2009) Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456). Clin Nutr 28(6):618–624CrossRefPubMed
37.
Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Wang ZM, Li JS (2010) Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery. J Parenter Enter Nutr 34(3):313–321CrossRef
38.
Wang D, Kong Y, Zhong B, Zhou X, Zhou Y (2010) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized comparison with conventional postoperative care. J Gastrointest Surg 14(4):620–627CrossRefPubMed
39.
Demanet J, Wattier JM, Colin P, Fantoni JC, Villers A, Lebuffe G (2011) Feasibility of fast track strategy for patients undergoing radical nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study: 8AP4-10. Eur J Anaesth 28(Suppl 48):120CrossRef
40.
Garcia-Botello S, de Canovas LR, Tornero C, Escamilla B, Espi-Macias A, Esclapez-Valero P et al (2011) Implementation of a perioperative multimodal rehabilitation protocol in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study. Cir Esp 89(3):159–166CrossRefPubMed
41.
Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, Hong S, Heo SC, Park KJ (2011) Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54(1):21–28CrossRefPubMed
42.
Roig JV, Garcia-Fadrique A, Salvador A, Villalba FL, Tormos B, Lorenzo-Linan MA et al (2011) Selective intestinal preparation in a multimodal rehabilitation program. Influence on preoperative comfort and the results after colorectal surgery. Cir Esp 89(3):167–174CrossRefPubMed
43.
Sokouti M, Aghdam BA, Golzari SE, Moghadaszadeh M (2011) A comparative study of postoperative pulmonary complications using fast track regimen and conservative analgesic treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Tanaffos 10(3):12–19PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875CrossRefPubMed
45.
Wang G, Jiang ZW, Xu J, Gong JF, Bao Y, Xie LF et al (2011) Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 17(5):671–676CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Chen HJ, Xin JL, Cai L, Tao ZH, Yuan HS, Bing CH et al (2012) Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1830–1839CrossRef
47.
Kim YM, Yim HW, Jeong SH, Klem ML, Callaway CW (2012) Does therapeutic hypothermia benefit adult cardiac arrest patients presenting with non-shockable initial rhythms?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies. Resuscitation 83(2):188–196CrossRefPubMed
48.
Ren L, Zhu D, Wei Y, Pan X, Liang L, Xu J et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 36(2):407–414. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-011-1348-4 CrossRefPubMed
49.
Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao K, Li G, Liu F, Pan H et al (2012) Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg 16(7):1379–1388CrossRefPubMed
50.
Wang G, Jiang ZW, Zhao K, Gao Y, Liu FT, Pan HF et al (2012) Fast track rehabilitation programme enhances functional recovery after laparoscopic colonic resection. Hepatogastroenterology 59(119):2158–2163PubMed
51.
52.
Feng F, Ji G, Li JP, Li XH, Shi H, Zhao ZW et al (2013) Fast-track surgery could improve postoperative recovery in radical total gastrectomy patients. World J Gastroenterol 19(23):3642–3648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, Riga A, Worthington T, Scott MJ et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 100(8):1015–1024CrossRefPubMed
54.
Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, Burr M, Birch C, Babor R et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg 100(4):482–489CrossRefPubMed
55.
Ni CY, Yang Y, Chang YQ, Cai H, Xu B, Yang F et al (2013) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for primary liver cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(6):542–547CrossRefPubMed
56.
Feng F, Li XH, Shi H, Wu GS, Zhang HW, Liu XN et al (2014) Fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy could improve postoperative recovery of low-risk rectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dig Dis 15(6):306–313CrossRefPubMed
57.
Gonenc M, Dural AC, Celik F, Akarsu C, Kocatas A, Kalayci MU et al (2014) Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in emergency surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg 207(6):807–814CrossRefPubMed
58.
Jia Y, Jin G, Guo S, Gu B, Jin Z, Gao X et al (2014) Fast-track surgery decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium and other complications in elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(1):77–84CrossRefPubMed
59.
Li K, Li JP, Peng NH, Jiang LL, Hu YJ, Huang MJ (2014) Fast-track improves post-operative nutrition and outcomes of colorectal surgery: a single-center prospective trial in China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 23(1):41–47PubMed
60.
Lu H, Fan Y, Zhang F, Li G, Zhang C, Lu L (2014) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 61(129):168–172PubMed
61.
Mari GM, Costanzi A, Maggioni D, Origi M, Ferrari GC, De MP et al (2014) Fast-track versus standard care in laparoscopic high anterior resection: a prospective randomized-controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 24(2):118–121CrossRef
62.
Nanavati AJ, Prabhakar S (2014) A comparative study of ‘fast-track’ versus traditional peri-operative care protocols in gastrointestinal surgeries. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):757–767CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zhao G, Cao S, Cui J (2014) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and reduces postoperative insulin resistance after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Support Care Cancer 22(2):351–358CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Christine S. M. Lau
Ronald S. Chamberlain
Publikationsdatum
07.11.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3807-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

World Journal of Surgery 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

A Backwards Step for Pilonidal Sinus Flap Surgery?

Original Scientific Report

Adrenal Injuries: Historical Facts and Modern Truths

Original Scientific Report

Chylous Ascites Management After Pancreatic Surgery

Original Scientific Report

Hypertension Cure Following Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Hyperaldosteronism is not Universal: Trends Over Two Decades

Original Scientific Report

Hepatectomy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Preoperative Chemotherapy: Evaluation of Postoperative Complications

Original Scientific Report

Mixed-Methods Assessment of Trauma and Acute Care Surgical Quality Improvement Programs in Peru

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.