Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Prevention Science 3/2019

07.01.2019

Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference

verfasst von: Rashelle J. Musci, Elizabeth Stuart

Erschienen in: Prevention Science | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

With innovation in causal inference methods and a rise in non-experimental data availability, a growing number of prevention researchers and advocates are thinking about causal inference. In this commentary, we discuss the current state of science as it relates to causal inference in prevention research, and reflect on key assumptions of these methods. We review challenges associated with the use of causal inference methodology, as well as considerations for hoping to integrate causal inference methods into their research. In short, this commentary addresses the key concepts of causal inference and suggests a greater emphasis on thoughtfully designed studies (to avoid the need for strong and potentially untestable assumptions) combined with analyses of sensitivity to those assumptions.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.CrossRef Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bray, B.C., Dziak, J.J., Oatrick, M.E., and Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science. Bray, B.C., Dziak, J.J., Oatrick, M.E., and Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding, M., Chen, Y., & Bressler, S. L. (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications (pp. 437–460). Ding, M., Chen, Y., & Bressler, S. L. (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications (pp. 437–460).
Zurück zum Zitat Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. In Sociological Methodology (volume 18, pp. 449–484). American Sociological Association. Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. In Sociological Methodology (volume 18, pp. 449–484). American Sociological Association.
Zurück zum Zitat Imbens, G.W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press. Imbens, G.W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelcey, B., Spybrook, J., & Dong, N. (2018). Sample size planning for cluster-randomized interventions probing multilevel mediation. Prevention Science. Kelcey, B., Spybrook, J., & Dong, N. (2018). Sample size planning for cluster-randomized interventions probing multilevel mediation. Prevention Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRefPubMed Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. In Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (pp. 1809–1814). Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. In Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (pp. 1809–1814).
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum, P. R. (2017). Observation and experiment: An introduction to causal inference. Harvard University Press. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2017). Observation and experiment: An introduction to causal inference. Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 808–840.CrossRef Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 808–840.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference
verfasst von
Rashelle J. Musci
Elizabeth Stuart
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Prevention Science / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0971-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Prevention Science 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe