nach oben

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Erschienen in:

11.02.2019 | Original Article

Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: a retrospective study

verfasst von: Taro Iguchi, Satoshi Tamada, Minoru Kato, Sayaka Yasuda, Taiyo Otoshi, Kosuke Hamada, Takeshi Yamasaki, Tatsuya Nakatani

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Alternative anti-androgen therapy (AAT) with flutamide after combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy with bicalutamide for metastatic prostate cancer is common. However, no studies have compared enzalutamide without AAT with enzalutamide after AAT with flutamide as treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We aimed to compare the efficacies of flutamide and enzalutamide for CRPC.

Methods

In our hospital, 55 patients were diagnosed with CRPC after CAB therapy and administered flutamide or enzalutamide between May 2014 and December 2017. Patients with flutamide failure were administered enzalutamide. We evaluated the (1) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best response with initial therapy, (2) PSA progression-free survival with initial therapy (PSA-PFS), (3) PSA best response with enzalutamide therapy, (4) PSA-PFS of enzalutamide therapy, and (5) overall survival (OS).

Results

As first-line therapy, patients were administered enzalutamide (n = 29) or flutamide (n = 26). In the flutamide group, 18 patients showed disease progression and were administered enzalutamide. PSA best response was statistically higher in the enzalutamide group. PSA-PFS was significantly longer in the enzalutamide group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19–0.92, p = 0.024]. However, there was no significant difference in PSA best response with enzalutamide therapy and PSA-PFS between the first- and second-line enzalutamide therapies (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.33–1.94, p = 0.62). There was no significant difference in OS between enzalutamide and flutamide groups (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.53–6.42, p = 0.33).

Conclusions

AAT with subsequent flutamide after CAB therapy with bicalutamide may be suitable for some CRPC patients.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442 CrossRefPubMed

Akaza H, Hinotsu S, Usami M et al (2009) Combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide for advanced prostate cancer: long-term follow-up of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study for survival. Cancer 115(15):3437–3445. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24395 CrossRefPubMed

Fujikawa K, Matsui Y, Fukuzawa S et al (2000) Prostate-specific antigen levels and clinical response to flutamide as the second hormone therapy for hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. Eur Urol 37(2):218–222. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020121 CrossRefPubMed

Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H (2005) Clinical outcome of maximum androgen blockade using flutamide as second-line hormonal therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int 96(6):791–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05766.x CrossRefPubMed

Okihara K, Ukimura O, Kanemitsu N et al (2007) Clinical efficacy of alternative antiandrogen therapy in Japanese men with relapsed prostate cancer after first-line hormonal therapy. Int J Urol 14(2):128–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01698.x CrossRefPubMed

Nishimura K, Arichi N, Tokugawa S et al (2007) Effects of flutamide as a second-line agent for maximum androgen blockade of hormone refractory prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14(3):264–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01681.x CrossRefPubMed

Suzuki H, Okihara K, Miyake H et al (2008) Alternative nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy for advanced prostate cancer that relapsed after initial maximum androgen blockade. J Urol 180(3):921–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.045 CrossRefPubMed

Okegawa T, Nutahara K, Higashihara E (2010) Alternative antiandrogen therapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single-center experience. Int J Urol 17(11):950–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02620.x CrossRefPubMed

Yasui M, Uemura K, Yoneyama S et al (2016) Predictors of poor response to secondary alternative antiandrogen therapy with flutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46(11):1042–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyw110 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lowrance WT, Roth BJ, Kirkby E et al (2016) Castration-resistant prostate cancer: AUA guideline amendment 2015. J Urol 195(5):1444–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.086 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tran C, Ouk S, Clegg NJ et al (2009) Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Science 324(5928):787–790. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168175 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Jung ME, Ouk S, Yoo D et al (2010) Structure-activity relationship for thiohydantoin androgen receptor antagonists for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). J Med Chem 53(7):2779–2796. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm901488g CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F et al (2012) Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 367(13):1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1207506 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE et al (2014) Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 371(5):424–433. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1405095 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Kim CS, Choi YD, Lee SE et al (2017) Post hoc analyses of East Asian patients from the randomized placebo-controlled PREVAIL trial of enzalutamide in patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Medicine 96(27):e7223. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007223 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Kimura G, Yonese J, Fukagai T et al (2016) Enzalutamide in Japanese patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A post-hoc analysis of the placebo-controlled PREVAIL trial. Int J Urol 23(5):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13072 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I et al (2008) Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 26(7):1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4487 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Eisenberger MA, Blumenstein BA, Crawford ED et al (1998) Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 339(15):1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199810083391504 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Momozono H, Miyake H, Tei H et al (2016) Clinical outcomes of anti-androgen withdrawal and subsequent alternative anti-androgen therapy for advanced prostate cancer following failure of initial maximum androgen blockade. Mol Clin Oncol 4(5):839–844. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.817 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R et al (2016) Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: the STRIVE trial. J Clin Oncol 34(18):2098–2106. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.64.9285 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Shore ND, Chowdhury S, Villers A et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (TERRAIN): a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 17(2):153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00518-5 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Nishimura K et al (2014) Development of nomogram to non-steroidal antiandrogen sequential alternation in prostate cancer for predictive model. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44(3):263–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyt230 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nagai T, Naiki T, Iida K et al (2018) Early abiraterone acetate treatment is beneficial in Japanese castration-resistant prostate cancer after failure of primary combined androgen blockade. Prostate Int 6(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2017.07.001 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Zhao JG, Liu JD, Shen PF et al (2018) Prior switching to a second-line nonsteroidal antiandrogen does not impact the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world retrospective study. Asian J Androl 20(6):545–550. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_58_18 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L et al (2017) Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377(4):352–360. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1704174 CrossRefPubMed

26.

James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR et al (2017) Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med 377(4):338–351. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702900 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M et al (2015) Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 373(8):737–746. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503747 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: a retrospective study
verfasst von: Taro Iguchi
Satoshi Tamada
Minoru Kato
Sayaka Yasuda
Taiyo Otoshi
Kosuke Hamada
Takeshi Yamasaki
Tatsuya Nakatani
Publikationsdatum: 11.02.2019
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01413-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: a retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Update Onkologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Molecular carcinogenesis of gastric cancer: Lauren classification, mucin phenotype expression, and cancer stem cells

Comparative assessment of prognostic outcomes between first-generation antiandrogens and novel androgen-receptor-axis-targeted agents in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy for osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma

The Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guideline for non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV

Dawn of precision medicine on gastric cancer

Analysis of major BCR-ABL1 mRNA by digital polymerase chain reaction is useful for prediction of international scale

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Update Onkologie