nach oben

Erschienen in:

26.12.2016 | Original Article

EORTC QLQ-COMU26: a questionnaire for the assessment of communication between patients and professionals. Phase III of the module development in ten countries

verfasst von: Juan Ignacio Arraras, Lisa M. Wintner, Monika Sztankay, Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski, Dirk Hofmeister, Anna Costantini, Anne Bredart, Teresa Young, Karin Kuljanic, Iwona M. Tomaszewska, Meropi Kontogianni, Wei-Chu Chie, Dagmara Kulis, Eva Greimel, Conducted on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Communication between patients and professionals is one major aspect of the support offered to cancer patients. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) has developed a cancer-specific instrument for the measurement of different issues related to the communication between cancer patients and their health care professionals.

Methods

Questionnaire development followed the EORTC QLG Module Development Guidelines. A provisional questionnaire was pre-tested (phase III) in a multicenter study within ten countries from five cultural areas (Northern and South Europe, UK, Poland and Taiwan). Patients from seven subgroups (before, during and after treatment, for localized and advanced disease each, plus palliative patients) were recruited. Structured interviews were conducted. Qualitative and quantitative analyses have been performed.

Results

One hundred forty patients were interviewed. Nine items were deleted and one shortened. Patients’ comments had a key role in item selection. No item was deleted due to just quantitative criteria. Consistency was observed in patients’ answers across cultural areas. The revised version of the module EORTC QLQ-COMU26 has 26 items, organized in 6 scales and 4 individual items.

Conclusions

The EORTC COMU26 questionnaire can be used in daily clinical practice and research, in various patient groups from different cultures. The next step will be an international field test with a large heterogeneous group of cancer patients.

Moore PM, Rivera Mercado S, Grez Artigues M, Lawrie TA (2013) Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Mar 28:3

American Society of Clinical Oncology (1998) Cancer care during the last phase of life. J Clin Oncol 16:1986–1996CrossRef

Committeee on Cancer Survivorship, Institute of Medicine (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academics of Sciences, Washington

Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

De Vries AM, de Roten Y, Meystre C, Passchier J, Despland JN, Stiefel F (2014) Clinician characteristics, communication, and patient outcome in oncology: a systematic review. Psychooncology 23:375–381CrossRefPubMed

Ansmann L, Kowalski C, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Pfaff H (2012) Patients’ perceived support from physicians and the role of hospital characteristics. Int J Qual Health Care 24:501–508CrossRefPubMed

Epstein AS, Morrison RS (2012) Palliative oncology: identity, progress, and the path ahead. Ann Oncol 23:43–48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fallowfield L (2009) The challenge of interacting with patients in oncology. Eur J Cancer 45:445–446CrossRefPubMed

Stewart M, Belle Brown J, Hammerton J, Donner A, Gavin A, Holliday RL, Whelan T, Leslie K, Cohen I, Weston W, Freeman T (2007) Improving communication between doctors and breast cancer patients. Ann Fam Med 5:387–394CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Ong LM, Visser MR, Lammes FB, de Haes JC (2000) Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients’ quality of life and satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns 41:145–156CrossRefPubMed

11.

Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H (2007) Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patien Educ Couns 69:63–75CrossRef

12.

Trudel TG, Leduc N, Dumont S (2014) Perceived communication between physicians and breast cancer patients as a predicting factor of patients’ health-related quality of life: a longitudinal analysis. Psychooncology 23:531–538CrossRefPubMed

13.

Farin E, Nagl M (2013) The patient-physician relationship in patients with breast cancer: influence on changes in quality of life after rehabilitation. Qual Life Res 22:283–294CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (2004) Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet 363:312–319CrossRefPubMed

15.

Street RL Jr, Elwyn G, Epstein RM (2012) Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 12:167–180CrossRefPubMed

16.

Carlson LE, Feldman-Stewart D, Tishelman C, Brundage MD, SCRN Communication Team (2005) Patient-professional communication research in cancer: an integrative review of research methods in the context of a conceptual framework. Psychooncology 14:812–828CrossRefPubMed

17.

Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C, SCRN Communication Team (2005) A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psychooncology 14:801–809CrossRefPubMed

18.

Morgan M (2008) The doctor–patient relationship. In: Scambler G (ed) Sociology as applied to medicine. Saunders/Elsevier, Edinburgh, pp 49–65

19.

Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington

20.

Epstein RM, Street RL Jr (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

21.

Surbone A (2008) Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care. Support Care Cancer 16:235–240CrossRefPubMed

22.

Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella F, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL, Duberstein PR (2005) Measuring patient-centered communication in patient–physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 61:1516–1528CrossRefPubMed

23.

Lawson MT (2002) Nurse practitioner and physician communication styles. Appl Nurs Res 15:60–66CrossRefPubMed

24.

Iasevoli M, Giantin V, Voci A, Valentini E, Zurlo A, Maggi S, Siviero P, Orrù G, Crepaldi G, Pegoraro R, Manzato E (2012) Discussing end-of-life care issues with terminally ill patients and their relatives: comparisons among physicians, nurses and psychologists. Aging Clin Exp Res 24:35–42PubMed

25.

Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, Chie WC, Bergenmar M, Costantini A, Young T, Vlasic KK, Velikova G (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738CrossRefPubMed

26.

Johnson C, Aaronson N, Blazeby J, Bottomley A, Fayers P, Koller M, Kuliś D, Ramage J, Sprangers M, Velikova G, Young T (2011) EORTC Quality of Life Group module development guidelines, fourth edn. EORTC QL Group, Brussels

27.

Arraras JI, Kuljanic K, Sztankay M, Wintner LM, Costantini A, Chie WC, Liavaag AH, Greimel E, Bredart A, Arnott M, Young T, Koller M (2015) Initial phases in the development of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer communication-specific module. Psychooncology 24:236–240CrossRefPubMed

28.

Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, Johnson C, Scott N, BottomleyA (2002) EORTC Quality of Life Group translation procedure, second edn. EORTC, Brussels

29.

Costantini A, Baile WF, Lenzi R, Costantini M, Ziparo V, Marchetti P, Grassi L (2009) Overcoming cultural barriers to giving bad news: feasibility of training to promote truth-telling to cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 24:180–185CrossRefPubMed

30.

Arraras JI, Greimel E, Chie WC, Sezer O, Bergenmar M, Costantini A, Young T, Vlasic KK, Velikova G, European Organisation for Research, Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group (2013) Cross-cultural differences in information disclosure evaluated through the EORTC questionnaires. Psychooncology 22:268–275CrossRefPubMed

31.

Mazor KM, Beard RL, Alexander GL, Arora NK, Firneno C, Gaglio B, Greene SM, Lemay CA, Robinson BE, Roblin DW, Walsh K, Street RL Jr, Gallagher TH (2013) Patients’ and family members’ views on patient-centered communication during cancer care. Psychooncology 22:2487–2495CrossRefPubMed

32.

Hack T (2005) Psycho-oncology special issue on communication. Psychooncology 14:797–798CrossRefPubMed

33.

Arraras JI, Wright S, Greimel E, Holzner B, Kuljanic-Vlasic K, Velikova G, Eisemann M, Visser A, EORTC Quality of Life Group (2004) Development of a questionnaire to evaluate the information needs of cancer patients: the EORTC questionnaire. Patient Educ Coun 54:235–241CrossRef

34.

Tobin GA (2012) Breaking bad news: a phenomenological exploration of Irish nurses’ experiences of caring for patients when a cancer diagnosis is given in an acute care facility (part 1). Cancer Nurs 35:E21–E29CrossRefPubMed

35.

Eid A, Petty M, Hutchins L, Thompson R (2009) “Breaking bad news”: standardized patient intervention improves communication skills for hematology-oncology fellows and advanced practice nurses. J Cancer Educ 24:154–159CrossRefPubMed

36.

Wuensch A, Tang T, Goelz T, Zhang Y, Stubenrauch S, Song L, Hong Y, Zhang H, Wirsching M, Fritzsche K (2013) Breaking bad news in China—the dilemma of patients’ autonomy and traditional norms. A first communication skills training for Chinese oncologists and caretakers. Psychooncology 22:1192–1195CrossRefPubMed

37.

Mauri E, Vegni E, Lozza E, Parker PA, Moja EA (2009) An exploratory study on the Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer. Support Care Cancer 17:1523–1530CrossRefPubMed

Titel: EORTC QLQ-COMU26: a questionnaire for the assessment of communication between patients and professionals. Phase III of the module development in ten countries
verfasst von: Juan Ignacio Arraras
Lisa M. Wintner
Monika Sztankay
Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
Dirk Hofmeister
Anna Costantini
Anne Bredart
Teresa Young
Karin Kuljanic
Iwona M. Tomaszewska
Meropi Kontogianni
Wei-Chu Chie
Dagmara Kulis
Eva Greimel
Conducted on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group
Publikationsdatum: 26.12.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3536-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

17.04.2024 | Mammakarzinom | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

EORTC QLQ-COMU26: a questionnaire for the assessment of communication between patients and professionals. Phase III of the module development in ten countries

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Chemotherapie mit Hindernissen

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Oncologists’ negative attitudes towards expressing emotion over patient death and burnout

Retrospective study of unplanned hospital admission for metastatic cancer patients visiting the emergency department

Association of worry about cancer to benefit finding and functioning in long-term cancer survivors

A prospective exploration of symptom burden clusters in women with breast cancer during chemotherapy treatment

End-of-life care for head and neck cancer patients: a population-based study

Information-sharing challenges between adolescents with cancer, their parents and health care providers: a qualitative study

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Chemotherapie mit Hindernissen

Update Onkologie