Background
The pediatric cancer neuroblastoma (NB) is characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical behavior, reflective of the biologic heterogeneity of this neoplasm [
1,
2]. Although specific genetic abnormalities have been shown to be predictive of the outcome in NB, recent studies have indicated that epigenetic aberrations also contribute to NB pathogenesis. Our group and others have shown that poor outcome is associated with hypermethylation of a number of tumor suppressor genes including
RASSF1A,
CASP8,
HIN-1, and
DCR2 [
3‐
5]. We have also demonstrated that NB tumor growth is impaired following treatment with drugs that inhibit histone deacetylase and/or DNA methylation in preclinical models [
6].
Biologic differences are commonly seen in NB cell lines established from human NB tumors, and morphologically distinct cell types [neuroblastic (N-type) and substrate-adherent (S-type)] have been extensively characterized. N-type cells have small, rounded, loosely adherent cell bodies with numerous neurite-like processes and express neuronal markers, such as tyrosine hydroxylase. S-type cells are substrate-adherent large, flat cells that resemble epithelial cells or fibroblasts and lack neuronal markers [
7,
8]. Interestingly, purified N-type and S-type NB cells can spontaneously interconvert from one cell type to the other, suggesting that epigenetic changes that are reversible may play a role in determining phenotype.
A CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) has been shown to be predictive of poor outcome in a variety of different cancers, including NB [
9]. In studies by Abe and coworkers, CIMP was detected in almost all
MYCN-amplified NB tumors, a genetic marker of poor prognosis. However, CIMP was also shown to be predictive of poor outcome in cases without
MYCN amplification [
10‐
12]. Further, in this study the prognostic influence of CIMP and
MYCN-amplification was independent of age and disease stage, both powerful clinical prognostic factors in NB.
To further investigate the role epigenetic changes play in determining NB phenotype, we analyzed the status of promoter methylation and the level of expression of seven genes with tumor suppressor function (THBS-1, HIC-1, HIN-1 TIG-1, CASP8, BLU, and SPARC), that are epigenetically silenced in subsets of adult cancers, in an N-type tumorigenic NB cell line (LA1-55n) and an S-type non-tumorigenic NB cell line (LA1-5s). Changes in NB cell morphology and soft agar colony growth following pharmacological reversal of the epigenetic aberrations were also examined.
Discussion
Epigenetic changes play an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer, and a CpG island methylator phenotype has been shown to be predictive of poor outcome. To investigate if epigenetic aberrations contribute to NB phenotype, we examined the methylation status and level of expression of seven genes with known tumor suppressor function (HIC-1, TIG-1, HIN-1, CASP8, THBS-1, SPARC, and BLU) in a N-type tumorigenic NB cell line (LA1-55n) and an S-type, non-tumorigenic NB cell line (LA1-5s). We show that the tumorigenic LA1-55n cells have higher levels of promoter methylation and lower levels of expression of five of the genes (THBS-1, HIC-1, HIN-1, TIG-1, and CASP8) compared to the non-tumorigenic LA1-5s cells. We also show that cell morphology and phenotype of the tumorigenic LA1-55n cells are modified following treatment with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-dC.
Each of the genes analyzed in this study has previously been shown to be epigenetically silenced in other types of cancer, and in some cases, the presence of abnormal promoter methylation has been shown to be associated with a more aggressive phenotype in adult or pediatric cancers.
SPARC is an extracellular matrix protein that has been shown to function as an inhibitor of angiogenesis [
15], and in lung adenocarcinomas SPARC methylation has been correlated with a negative prognosis [
16]. Athough disparate levels of SPARC expression was seen in the NB cell lines, there was no evidence of SPARC methylation in the NB cells, indicating that alternative mechanisms regulate SPARC expression in NB. In contrast, we did find higher levels of methylation of the pro-apoptotic gene
CASP8 in the tumorigenic LA1-55n cells, which is consistent with the association between
CASP8 methylation and high-risk disease and poor outcome that has been reported in primary NB tumors [
4].
BLU functions as a tumor supressor in many cancer types [
17]. In human nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the frequency of
BLU promoter methylation was much higher compared with non-neoplastic nasopharyngeal epithelia [
18]. However, we found no significant difference in the level of expression of this gene in the NB cell lines.
HIC-1 is a newly discovered tumor suppressor and transcriptional repressor which is located at 17p13.3, a region which frequently undergoes allelic loss in human cancers [
19]. A recent study indicated that HIC-1 is a central molecule in a novel mechanism controlling cell growth and that the disruption of the HIC-1 mediated pathway may lead to abnormal cell proliferation [
20]. Moreover, low to undetected expression of
HIC-1 is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer [
21]. In this study, expression of
HIC-1 is higher in non-tumorigenic NB cells compared with tumorigenic cells.
TIG-1, which has been linked to retinoic acid signaling, was shown to be downregulated in many cancers [
22,
23]. Forced expression of
TIG1 in cancer cells results in decreased invasiveness and tumorigenicity, indicating that diminished expression of
TIG1 is involved in the malignant progression of cancer. Our study showed that lower level expression of
TIG-1 in tumorigenic NB cells is associated with hypermethylation of its promoter.
HIN-1 is a putative cytokine with growth inhibitory activities.
HIN-1 was initially found to be significantly downregulated in human breast carcinomas and in preinvasive lesions.
HIN-1 is a potent inhibitor of anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent cell growth, cell migration, and invasion [
24,
25]. Our previous study indicated that methylation of
HIN-1 is associated with poor outcome in NB [
4]. In this study we showed that the methylation degree of
HIN-1 promoter region is much higher in tumorigenic NB cells compared with non-tumorigenic NB cells.
Because of the remarkable up-regulation of
THBS-1 expression that was seen in the LA1-55n cells following treatment with 5-Aza-dC, we performed additional studies examining the histone marks along the promoter regions of this gene in the NB cell lines. Histone marks associated with a repressive chromatin state (H3K9Me3, H3K27Me3, and H3K4Me3) were detected in the tumorigenic LA1-55n cells, whereas histone codes associated with an active chromatin state (acetyl H3, acetyl H4, and H3K4Me3) were present in non-tumorigenic LA1-5s cells. THBS-1 is a well-known natural inhibitor of angiogenesis, and down-regulation of THBS-1 plays a critical role in the angiogenic switch in several tumor types. We have previously shown that the
THBS-1 promoter is methylated and silenced in tumorigenic NB cell lines and in a cohort of NB primary tumors [
13]. In this study, we compiled a detailed map of histone acetylation and methylation across a 1.2 kb region of the
THBS-1 promoter which indicates that histone acetylation also plays an important role in regulating
THBS-1 expression. Furthermore, the results of our ChIP assay indicate that an accessible chromatin structure is important in
THBS-1 expression. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that
THBS-1 expression is regulated by histone modification. Our results further suggest that the alteration of key parameters of the histone code depend upon inhibition of the DNMTs, and DNA hypermethylation mediated by DNMTs may be essential for maintaining a particular combination of histone modifications at gene promoters silenced with aberrant DNA methylation.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
QY designed cellular and molecular experiments, performed molecular experiments, and drafted the manuscript. YT and LJG performed cellular experiments. KRO, AC, and HRS participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript. LAG participated in the design of the study, study coordination, and revised the manuscript critically. SLC participated in the overall design, study coordination and finalized the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.