Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2/2018

21.12.2017 | Brief Report

Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: an investigation of the good-subject effect

verfasst von: Jeffrey S. Stein, Allison N. Tegge, Jamie K. Turner, Warren K. Bickel

Erschienen in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Episodic future thinking (EFT), an intervention involving mental simulation of future events, has been shown to reduce both delay discounting and cigarette self-administration. In the present study, we extended these findings by showing that EFT in a web-based sample of smokers reduces delay discounting and intensity of demand for cigarettes (ad libitum consumption) in a hypothetical purchase task. No effect was observed on elasticity of demand (sensitivity to price) or cigarette craving. We also explored whether demand characteristics (specifically, the “good-subject” effect) might be responsible for observed effects. EFT participants were significantly better able than control participants to discern the experimental hypothesis. However, EFT participants were not better than controls at identifying whether they had been assigned to the experimental group and, likewise, showed no differences in attitudes about the experiment and experimenter. Importantly, effects of EFT on delay discounting and demand remained significant even when controlling for measures of demand characteristics, indicating that EFT’s effects are independent of participants’ perceptions about the experiment.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Audrain-McGovern, J., Rodriguez, D., Epstein, L. H., Cuevas, J., Rodgers, K., & Wileyto, E. P. (2009). Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103, 99–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Audrain-McGovern, J., Rodriguez, D., Epstein, L. H., Cuevas, J., Rodgers, K., & Wileyto, E. P. (2009). Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103, 99–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 146, 447–454.CrossRef Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 146, 447–454.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cox, L. S., Tiffany, S. T., & Christen, A. G. (2001). Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 3, 7–16.CrossRefPubMed Cox, L. S., Tiffany, S. T., & Christen, A. G. (2001). Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 3, 7–16.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Daniel, T. O., Stanton, C. M., & Epstein, L. H. (2013). The future is now: Reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychological Science, 24, 2339–2342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daniel, T. O., Stanton, C. M., & Epstein, L. H. (2013). The future is now: Reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychological Science, 24, 2339–2342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, E. A., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: Demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 412–426.CrossRefPubMed Jacobs, E. A., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: Demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 412–426.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Koffarnus, M. N., & Bickel, W. K. (2014). A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: Accurate discount rates in less than one minute. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22, 222–228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koffarnus, M. N., & Bickel, W. K. (2014). A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: Accurate discount rates in less than one minute. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22, 222–228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Koffarnus, M. N., Franck, C. T., Stein, J. S., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). A modified exponential behavioral economic demand model to better describe consumption data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23, 504–512.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koffarnus, M. N., Franck, C. T., Stein, J. S., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). A modified exponential behavioral economic demand model to better describe consumption data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23, 504–512.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, H., & Epstein, L. H. (2014). Living in the moment: Effects of time perspective and emotional valence of episodic thinking on delay discounting. Behavioral Neuroscience, 128, 12–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin, H., & Epstein, L. H. (2014). Living in the moment: Effects of time perspective and emotional valence of episodic thinking on delay discounting. Behavioral Neuroscience, 128, 12–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 216, 305–321.CrossRef MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 216, 305–321.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nichols, A. L., & Maner, J. K. (2008). The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 151–165.CrossRefPubMed Nichols, A. L., & Maner, J. K. (2008). The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 151–165.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. The American Psychologist, 17, 776.CrossRef Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. The American Psychologist, 17, 776.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rung, J. M. & Madden, G. J. (2018). Demand characteristics in episodic future thinking: Delay discounting and healthy eating. In Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. Rung, J. M. & Madden, G. J. (2018). Demand characteristics in episodic future thinking: Delay discounting and healthy eating. In Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology.
Zurück zum Zitat Snider, S. E., LaConte, S. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2016). Episodic future thinking: Expansion of the temporal window in individuals with alcohol dependence. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 40, 1558–1566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Snider, S. E., LaConte, S. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2016). Episodic future thinking: Expansion of the temporal window in individuals with alcohol dependence. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 40, 1558–1566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Stein, J. S., Koffarnus, M. N., Snider, S. E., Quisenberry, A. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). Identification and management of nonsystematic purchase task data: Toward best practice. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23, 377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stein, J. S., Koffarnus, M. N., Snider, S. E., Quisenberry, A. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). Identification and management of nonsystematic purchase task data: Toward best practice. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23, 377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Stein, J. S., Sze, Y. Y., Athamneh, L., Koffarnus, M. N., Epstein, L. H., & Bickel, W. K. (2017). Think fast: Rapid assessment of the effects of episodic future thinking on delay discounting in overweight/obese participants. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 1–7.CrossRef Stein, J. S., Sze, Y. Y., Athamneh, L., Koffarnus, M. N., Epstein, L. H., & Bickel, W. K. (2017). Think fast: Rapid assessment of the effects of episodic future thinking on delay discounting in overweight/obese participants. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 1–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sze, Y. Y., Daniel, T. O., Kilanowski, C. K., Collins, R. L., & Epstein, L. H. (2015). Web-based and mobile delivery of an episodic future thinking intervention for overweight and obese families: A feasibility study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3, e97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sze, Y. Y., Daniel, T. O., Kilanowski, C. K., Collins, R. L., & Epstein, L. H. (2015). Web-based and mobile delivery of an episodic future thinking intervention for overweight and obese families: A feasibility study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3, e97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Sze, Y. Y., Stein, J. S., Bickel, W. K., Paluch, R. A., & Epstein, L. H. (2017). Bleak present, bright future: Online episodic future thinking, scarcity, delay discounting, and food demand. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 683–697.CrossRefPubMed Sze, Y. Y., Stein, J. S., Bickel, W. K., Paluch, R. A., & Epstein, L. H. (2017). Bleak present, bright future: Online episodic future thinking, scarcity, delay discounting, and food demand. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 683–697.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: an investigation of the good-subject effect
verfasst von
Jeffrey S. Stein
Allison N. Tegge
Jamie K. Turner
Warren K. Bickel
Publikationsdatum
21.12.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9908-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.