Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 12/2016

15.06.2016

EQ-5D-derived health utilities and minimally important differences for chronic health conditions: 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey of Sicker Adults in Canada

verfasst von: Kate Tsiplova, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Tim Cooke, Feng Xie

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to estimate the EQ-5D-derived health utilities associated with selected chronic conditions (hypertension, heart disease, arthritis, asthma or COPD, cancer, diabetes, chronic back pain, and anxiety or depression) and to estimate minimally important differences (MID) based on the Commonwealth Fund Survey of Sicker Adults in Canada.

Methods

We used a cross-sectional survey of 3765 sick adults in Canada conducted in 2011 by the Commonwealth Fund. Health utilities were calculated for the entire sample and for each of the eight chronic health conditions. An ordinary least squares regression was used to estimate the utility decrement associated with these conditions with and without adjustment for socio-demographic factors. The MIDs were estimated using the anchor- and distribution-based methods.

Results

The adjusted utility decrement varied from 0.028 (95 % confidence interval (CI) −0.049, −0.008) for diabetes to 0.124 (95 % CI −0.142, −0.105) for anxiety or depression. The anchor-based MID for the entire group was 0.044 (95 % CI 0.025, 0.062), and the distribution-based MID for the entire group was 0.091. The condition-specific MIDs using the distribution-based method ranged from 0.089 for cancer to 0.108 for asthma or COPD.

Conclusions

The MID estimated by the distribution-based method was larger than the MID estimated by the anchor-based method, indicating that the choice of method matters. The impact of arthritis, anxiety or depression, and chronic back pain on health utility was substantial, all exceeding or approximating the MID estimated using either anchor- or distribution-based methods.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brożek, J. L., Guyatt, G. H., & Schünemann, H. J. (2006). How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 69. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brożek, J. L., Guyatt, G. H., & Schünemann, H. J. (2006). How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 69. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7525-4-69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schünemann, H. J., Puhan, M., Goldstein, R., Jaeschke, R., & Guyatt, G. H. (2005). Measurement properties and interpretability of the chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ). Copd: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2(1), 81–89. doi:10.1081/COPD-200050651.CrossRefPubMed Schünemann, H. J., Puhan, M., Goldstein, R., Jaeschke, R., & Guyatt, G. H. (2005). Measurement properties and interpretability of the chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ). Copd: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2(1), 81–89. doi:10.​1081/​COPD-200050651.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371–383. doi:10.4065/77.4.371.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371–383. doi:10.​4065/​77.​4.​371.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 41(5), 582–592.PubMed Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 41(5), 582–592.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyrwich, K. W., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1999). Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(9), 861–873. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00071-2.CrossRefPubMed Wyrwich, K. W., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1999). Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(9), 861–873. doi:10.​1016/​S0895-4356(99)00071-2.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.CrossRefPubMed Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Le, Q. A., Doctor, J. N., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2013). Minimal clinically important differences for the EQ-5D and QWB-SA in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): Results from a doubly randomized preference trial (DRPT). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 59. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Le, Q. A., Doctor, J. N., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2013). Minimal clinically important differences for the EQ-5D and QWB-SA in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): Results from a doubly randomized preference trial (DRPT). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 59. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7525-11-59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Agborsangaya, C., Lau, D., Lahtinen, M., Cooke, T., & Johnson, J. (2013). Health-related quality of life and healthcare utilization in multimorbidity: Results of a cross-sectional survey. Quality of Life Research, 22(4), 791–799. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0214-7.CrossRefPubMed Agborsangaya, C., Lau, D., Lahtinen, M., Cooke, T., & Johnson, J. (2013). Health-related quality of life and healthcare utilization in multimorbidity: Results of a cross-sectional survey. Quality of Life Research, 22(4), 791–799. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-012-0214-7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 1571–1582. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.034.CrossRefPubMed Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 1571–1582. doi:10.​1016/​j.​socscimed.​2004.​08.​034.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M., Pierson, R., & Applebaum, S. (2011). New 2011 survey of patients with complex care needs in eleven countries finds that care is often poorly coordinated. Health Affairs, 30(12), 2437–2448.CrossRefPubMed Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M., Pierson, R., & Applebaum, S. (2011). New 2011 survey of patients with complex care needs in eleven countries finds that care is often poorly coordinated. Health Affairs, 30(12), 2437–2448.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris Interactive Inc. (2011). International health perspectives 2011 survey of sicker adults, methods report. Harris Interactive Inc. (2011). International health perspectives 2011 survey of sicker adults, methods report.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pullenayegum, E. M., Tarride, J.-E., Xie, F., Goeree, R., Gerstein, H. C., & O’Reilly, D. (2010). Analysis of health utility data when some subjects attain the upper bound of 1: Are tobit and CLAD models appropriate? Value in Health, 13(4), 487–494. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00695.x.CrossRefPubMed Pullenayegum, E. M., Tarride, J.-E., Xie, F., Goeree, R., Gerstein, H. C., & O’Reilly, D. (2010). Analysis of health utility data when some subjects attain the upper bound of 1: Are tobit and CLAD models appropriate? Value in Health, 13(4), 487–494. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1524-4733.​2010.​00695.​x.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumley, T. (2012). Survey: Analysis of complex survey samples. R Package Version 3.28–2. Lumley, T. (2012). Survey: Analysis of complex survey samples. R Package Version 3.28–2.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Supina, A., Johnson, J., Patten, S., Williams, J. A., & Maxwell, C. (2007). The usefulness of the EQ-5D in differentiating among persons with major depressive episode and anxiety. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 749–754. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-9159-z.CrossRefPubMed Supina, A., Johnson, J., Patten, S., Williams, J. A., & Maxwell, C. (2007). The usefulness of the EQ-5D in differentiating among persons with major depressive episode and anxiety. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 749–754. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-006-9159-z.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Whynes, D. K., McCahon, R. A., Ravenscroft, A., Hodgkinson, V., Evley, R., & Hardman, J. G. (2013). Responsiveness of the EQ-5D health-related quality-of-life instrument in assessing low back pain. Value in Health, 16(1), 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.003.CrossRefPubMed Whynes, D. K., McCahon, R. A., Ravenscroft, A., Hodgkinson, V., Evley, R., & Hardman, J. G. (2013). Responsiveness of the EQ-5D health-related quality-of-life instrument in assessing low back pain. Value in Health, 16(1), 124–132. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2012.​09.​003.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Szende, A., Janssen, B., & Cabases, J. (Eds.). (2014). Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer Open. Szende, A., Janssen, B., & Cabases, J. (Eds.). (2014). Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer Open.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, G. R., Gwadry Sridhar, F., Guyatt, G. H., & Walter, S. D. (2001). Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 39(10), 1039–1047.CrossRefPubMed Norman, G. R., Gwadry Sridhar, F., Guyatt, G. H., & Walter, S. D. (2001). Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 39(10), 1039–1047.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat König, H.-H., Born, A., Günther, O., Matschinger, H., Heinrich, S., Riedel-Heller, S. G., et al. (2010). Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with anxiety disorders. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 47. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral König, H.-H., Born, A., Günther, O., Matschinger, H., Heinrich, S., Riedel-Heller, S. G., et al. (2010). Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with anxiety disorders. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 47. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7525-8-47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kvam, A. K., Fayers, P. M., & Wisloff, F. (2011). Responsiveness and minimal important score differences in quality-of-life questionnaires: A comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific questionnaire to the generic utility questionnaires EQ-5D and 15D in patients with multiple myeloma. European Journal of Haematology, 87(4), 330–337. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01665.x.CrossRefPubMed Kvam, A. K., Fayers, P. M., & Wisloff, F. (2011). Responsiveness and minimal important score differences in quality-of-life questionnaires: A comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific questionnaire to the generic utility questionnaires EQ-5D and 15D in patients with multiple myeloma. European Journal of Haematology, 87(4), 330–337. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0609.​2011.​01665.​x.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
EQ-5D-derived health utilities and minimally important differences for chronic health conditions: 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey of Sicker Adults in Canada
verfasst von
Kate Tsiplova
Eleanor Pullenayegum
Tim Cooke
Feng Xie
Publikationsdatum
15.06.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1336-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Quality of Life Research 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe