Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2020

11.03.2019

ERCP-related perforation: an analysis of operative outcomes in a large series over 12 years

verfasst von: Nilesh Sadashiv Patil, Nisha Solanki, Pramod Kumar Mishra, Barjesh Chander Sharma, Sundeep Singh Saluja

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Perforation is a rare but serious adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of morbidity and mortality after surgical management of ERCP-related perforation (EP).

Methods

The records of patients with EP requiring surgical intervention at a tertiary referral center in a 12-year period (2004–2016) were retrospectively analyzed for demography, indications for ERCP, risk factors, timing and type of surgical repair, post-operative course, hospital stay, and outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify the parameters predicting survival.

Results

Of 25,300 ERCPs, 380 (1.5%) had EP. Non-operative management was successful in 330 (86.8%) patients. 50 (13.2%) patients were operated for EP. Out of 50, the perforation was detected during ERCP (intra-procedure) in 32 patients (64%). In 30 patients (60%), the surgery was performed within 24 h of ERCP. Twenty patients underwent delayed surgery (after 24 h of ERCP) following the failure of initial non-operative management. The delayed surgery after an unsuccessful medical treatment had a detrimental effect on morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Post-operative duodenal leak was the only independent predictor of 90-day mortality (p = 0.02, OR = 9.1, 95% CI 1.52–54.64). Addition of T-tube duodenostomy (TTD) to the primary repair for either type I or type II perforations increased post-operative duodenal leak (type I, p = 0.048 and type II; p = 0.001) and mortality (type I, p = 0.009 and type II, p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Although EP is a rare event, it has a serious impact on morbidity and mortality. Delaying of surgery following failed non-operative management worsens the prognosis. Addition of TTD to the repair is not helpful in these patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stapfer M, Selby RR, Strain SC et al (2000) Management of duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 232:191–198CrossRef Stapfer M, Selby RR, Strain SC et al (2000) Management of duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 232:191–198CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR et al (2006) Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford) 8:393–399CrossRef Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR et al (2006) Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford) 8:393–399CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubecz A, Ottmann J, Schweigert M et al (2012) Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg 55:99–104CrossRef Dubecz A, Ottmann J, Schweigert M et al (2012) Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg 55:99–104CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Lee SH, Paik WH et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of patients who experienced perforations associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 26:3293–3300CrossRef Kim J, Lee SH, Paik WH et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of patients who experienced perforations associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 26:3293–3300CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfieri S, Rosa F, Cina C et al (2013) Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center. Surg Endosc 27:2005–2012CrossRef Alfieri S, Rosa F, Cina C et al (2013) Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center. Surg Endosc 27:2005–2012CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH (2013) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:496–504 Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH (2013) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:496–504
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1781–1788CrossRef Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1781–1788CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Machado NO (2012) Management of duodenal perforation postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 13:18–25PubMed Machado NO (2012) Management of duodenal perforation postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 13:18–25PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Prachayakul V, Aswakul P (2014) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases 2:522–527CrossRef Prachayakul V, Aswakul P (2014) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases 2:522–527CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell RC, Van Steigmann G, Goff J et al (1991) Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg 57:237–240PubMed Bell RC, Van Steigmann G, Goff J et al (1991) Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg 57:237–240PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10CrossRef Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee TH, Han JH, Park SH (2013) Endoscopic treatment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations. Clin Endosc 46:522–528CrossRef Lee TH, Han JH, Park SH (2013) Endoscopic treatment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations. Clin Endosc 46:522–528CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY et al (2009) Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc 23:833–838CrossRef Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY et al (2009) Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc 23:833–838CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Lehman G, VennesJ et al (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393CrossRef Cotton PB, Lehman G, VennesJ et al (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang L, Yu QS, Zhang Q et al (2015) Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation. Dig Endosc 27:381–387CrossRef Huang L, Yu QS, Zhang Q et al (2015) Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation. Dig Endosc 27:381–387CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB et al (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 101:1644–1655CrossRef Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB et al (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 101:1644–1655CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRef Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarlett PY, Falk GL (1994) The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 64:843–846CrossRef Scarlett PY, Falk GL (1994) The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 64:843–846CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Dalgic T et al (2012) Surgical outcome of patients with perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:371–377CrossRef Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Dalgic T et al (2012) Surgical outcome of patients with perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:371–377CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin YJ, Jeong S, Kim JH et al (2013) Clinical course and proposed treatment strategy for ERCP-related duodenal perforation: a multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 45:806–812CrossRef Jin YJ, Jeong S, Kim JH et al (2013) Clinical course and proposed treatment strategy for ERCP-related duodenal perforation: a multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 45:806–812CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:1135–1141CrossRef Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:1135–1141CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC et al (2008) Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 196:975–981CrossRef Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC et al (2008) Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 196:975–981CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder WH, Weigelt JA, Watkins WL et al (1980) The surgical management of duodenal trauma. Precepts based on a review of 247 cases. Arch Surg 115:422–429CrossRef Snyder WH, Weigelt JA, Watkins WL et al (1980) The surgical management of duodenal trauma. Precepts based on a review of 247 cases. Arch Surg 115:422–429CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrillo EH, Richardson JD, Miller FB (1996) Evolution in the management of duodenal injuries. J Trauma 40:1037–1045CrossRef Carrillo EH, Richardson JD, Miller FB (1996) Evolution in the management of duodenal injuries. J Trauma 40:1037–1045CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat DuBose JJ, Inaba K, Teixeira PG et al (2008) Pyloric exclusion in the treatment of severe duodenal injuries: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. Am Surg 74:925–929PubMed DuBose JJ, Inaba K, Teixeira PG et al (2008) Pyloric exclusion in the treatment of severe duodenal injuries: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. Am Surg 74:925–929PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Seamon MJ, Pieri PG, Fisher CA et al (2007) A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve clinical outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries? J Trauma 62:829–833CrossRef Seamon MJ, Pieri PG, Fisher CA et al (2007) A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve clinical outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries? J Trauma 62:829–833CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Feliciano DV et al (1990) Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective. J Trauma 30:1469–1475CrossRef Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Feliciano DV et al (1990) Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective. J Trauma 30:1469–1475CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ivatury RR, Gaudino J, Ascer E et al (1985) Treatment of penetrating duodenal injuries: primary repair vs. repair with decompressive enterostomy/serosal patch. J Trauma 25:337–341CrossRef Ivatury RR, Gaudino J, Ascer E et al (1985) Treatment of penetrating duodenal injuries: primary repair vs. repair with decompressive enterostomy/serosal patch. J Trauma 25:337–341CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
ERCP-related perforation: an analysis of operative outcomes in a large series over 12 years
verfasst von
Nilesh Sadashiv Patil
Nisha Solanki
Pramod Kumar Mishra
Barjesh Chander Sharma
Sundeep Singh Saluja
Publikationsdatum
11.03.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06733-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.