To identify alternatives for radiographers’ postures while performing mammography that can contribute to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs).
Radiographers’ postures to positioning craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views were simulated without any intervention for three scenarios: radiographer/patient with similar statures, radiographer smaller than patient and radiographer taller than patient. Actions were taken to modify the postures: seated radiographer; patient on a step; seated patient; radiographer on a step. All the postures were analysed using kinovea 0.8.15 software and the angles were measured twice and classified according to European standard EN1005–4: 2005.
The non-acceptable angles were measured mainly during MLO positioning when radiographer was taller than the patient: 139° and 120° for arm-flexion and abduction, 72° for trunk and −24° for head/neck-flexion. The introduction of alternative postures (radiographer seated), allowed improvements in posture (60° and 99° for arm flexion and abduction, 14° for trunk and 0° for head/neck flexion), being classified as acceptable.
The alternative postures simulated have the potential to reduce the risk of developing WRMSDs when radiographers and patients have different statures.
• Radiographers’ postures in mammography can contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders
• Non-acceptable posture was identified for MLO breast positioning (radiographer taller than patient)
• Adapting posture to patient biotype reduces the WRMSD risk for radiographers
Costa S, Oliveira E, Reis C et al (2014) Mammography equipment design: impact on radiographers’ practice. Insights Imaging 5:723–730
Cheesman A (2008) Workplace ergonomics for the health care professional. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 39:198–205 CrossRef
Whysall Z, Haslam C, Haslam R (2006) A stage of change approach to reducing occupational ill health. Prev Med (Baltim) 43:422–428 CrossRef
Robertson MM, Boiselle P, Eisenberg R et al (2012) Examination of computer task exposures in radiologists: a work systems approach. Work 41(Suppl 1):1818–1820 PubMed
Serranheira F, Sousa Uva A, Lopes M (2008) Caderno/Avulso 5—Lesões Músculo-Esqueléticas e Trabalho: Alguns métodos de avaliação do risco. Sociedade Portuguesa Medicina do Trabalho, Lisboa
Kapitaniak B, Péninou GSB (2000) Assistance ergonomique pour la conception de mammographe GE Medical system: rapport de l’étude ergonomique. Available from: http://pure.ltu.se/portal/en/publications/assistance-ergonomique-pour-la-conception-de-mammographie-ge-medical-system%28e6680f00-01e6-11e0-9633-000ea68e967b%29.html
Kapitaniak B, Moallem A, Péninou G. Multi-cultural ergonomics contextual study in designing a new generation of mammography equipment. Available from: http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/amoallem/publications/325kapitaniak.pdf
Kumar S, Moro L, Narayan Y (2004) Morbidity among X-ray technologists. Int J Ind Ergon 33:29–40 CrossRef
Reis C (2013) Digital mammography: characterisation of practice and equipment performance in Portuguese healthcare providers. Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon
Reis C, Sakellaris T, Carrasqueiro S, Pascoal A (2012) Digital mammography in Portugal: a national survey on technology and practices. In: Symposium Mammographicum 2012 Meeting Abstracts. The British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 1–15
Kolb GR (2005) Solving the digital dilemma: a strategic approach. Semin Breast Dis 8:43–53 CrossRef
- Ergonomic strategies to improve radiographers’ posture during mammography activities
Cláudia Sá dos Reis
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Radiologie
Mail Icon II