Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2015

Open Access 01.12.2015 | Erratum

Erratum to: Association between pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and physical function in dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Annelore H. van Dalen-Kok, Marjoleine Pieper, Margot de Waal, Albert Lukas, Bettina S. Husebo, Wilco P. Achterberg

Erschienen in: BMC Geriatrics | Ausgabe 1/2015

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.​1186/​s12877-015-0048-6.
The online version of the original article can be found at http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12877-015-0048-6.
The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes. The presentation of Table 2, Table 5 and Table 6 was incorrect. The corrected tables are given below.
Table 2
Measurements of pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms and physical function
 
Measurement of pain
Measurement of neuropsychiatric symptoms
Measurement of function
First author
Rating scale
Method of detection
Rating scale
Method of detection
Rating scale
Method of detection
Ahn 201336
MDS pain severity scale, combining pain frequency and pain intensity
Self-report, if not possible staff report based on proxy reports
MDS subscales; wandering-item, aggression behaviour scale (ABS), challenging behaviour profile (CBP) agitation subscale
Patient self-report, proxy and professional
MDS-ADL long form (7 items)
Staff observation
Bartels 20038
No use of rating scale
Data collection instrument (3-month period), raters unknown
MDS for depression
Medical records
MDS (number of ADLs)
Medical records
Black 200639
No use of rating scale
Medical records, preceding 6 months, interview surrogate and physician
No use of rating scales
Medical records, preceding 6 months, interview proxy and staff
No use of rating scale
Medical records, preceding 6 months, interview proxy and staff
Brummel-Smith 200240
1 out of 3 scales: faces or line scale, or word-based pain intensity scale
self-report, assessed by trained research assistants
No use of rating scales
Trained research assistants
No use of rating scale
Trained research assistants
Cipher 20044
GMPI pain and suffering subscale
Part of neuropsychological evaluation by a licensed clinical geropsychologist
-GDS-15 “-26 dysfunctional behaviours with scores “1-7”
Part of neuropsychological evaluation by a licensed clinical geropsychologist
PRADLI
Part of neuropsychological evaluation by a licensed clinical geropsychologist
Cipher 200641
GMPI
Part of neuropsychological evaluation by a licensed clinical geropsychologist and each instrument was administered after interviewing the resident, nursing staff and family members
GLDS, 19 categories with scores 1-7
Part of neuropsychological evaluation by a licensed clinical geropsychologist and each instrument was administered after interviewing the resident, nursing staff and family members, Medical records, preceding 6 to max 26, Months
GLDS
Part of neuropsychological evaluation by a licensed clinical geropsychologist and each instrument was administered after interviewing the resident, nursing staff and family members
D’Astolfo 200644
No use of rating scale
Medical records, preceding 6 to max 26 months
No use of rating scales
 
No use of rating scale
Medical records Ambulatory status: independent, requires assistance, wheel chair (or bedridden n?=?1)
Gruber-Baldini 200545
PGC-PIS, score ≥ 2
Rating by supervisory staff member
CSDD
Rating by supervisory staff member
MDS; activities of daily living scale, SMOI
Rating/observation by supervisory staff member
CMAI
Kunik 200530
PGC-PIS, item on level of pain in previous week, scores 1-6
Interview with patient and proxy by trained interviewer/research assistant
CMAI
Interview with patient and proxy by trained interviewer/research assistant
-
-
HAM-D
NPI (subdomains delusion/hallucinations)
Leonard 200650
MDS pain burden using a 4-level composite score based on pain frequency and intensity
-
MDS (Physical aggression: MDS item 'others were hit, shoved, scratched, sexually abused'; Depression: MDS score ≥3 on sum of 9 items, e.g. 'being sad', 'making negative statements', 'persistent anger with self or others', 'pained facial expressions'. (At least once in week before)
-
-
-
Leong 200735
PAINAD for non-communicative patients
Interviews with patient and staff member by professionals for communicative patients
Depression with GDS-15 or STAI
Self-report or staff report
AAS
Not reported
Anxiety with Cornell
Lin 201146
PAINAD-Chinese version
Observation immediately following instances of routine care by principal investigator and research assistant
No use of rating scales
Medical records and observations by professional
No use of rating scale
Medical records and observation by professional
Morgan 201247
PGC-PIS worst pain item
Not reported
CMAI aggression subscale
Not reported
-
-
CMAI non-aggressive physical agitation subscale
HAM-D depression
Norton 201042
PPQ, intensity item, 10–14 day baseline
Primary CNA and data used from medical records
RMBPC-NH, selection of 3 need driven behaviours, BEHAVE-AD
Primary CNA and unit staff
PSMS
Nurses and trained research assistants
Shega 200548
VDS, 1 item on presence and severity of pain ‘right now’
Interviews with patients and caregivers by trained research assistant
GDS-15
Interview patient and proxy
KATZ
Interview patient and proxy
CMAI
IADL
Shega 201049
VDS, 5 point, ‘pain past 4 weeks’
Interviews with patient by trained research assistant
Mental Health screening questionnaire; 5-item and 6 point scale
Interview with patient by trained research assistant
OARS/IADL; 3 point scale
Interview patient by trained research assistant
Torvik 201048
VRS, 4 point, ‘pain right now’
Patient self-report
DQoL, 29-items on 5 domains: self-esteem, aesthetics, positive affect, negative affect, belonging
Not reported
Barthel
Self-report and medical records
Tosato 20123
InterRAI LTCF
InterRAI LTCF questions and observation of behaviour, any type of pain or discomfort of the body in previous 3 days by trained (research) staff
InterRAI LTCF 5 behavioural symptoms, previous 3 days
Not reported
MDS ADL Hierarchy Scale
Data recorded by study physicians
Volicer 200937
MDS-RAI pain frequency (item J2a)
Combination of physical examination, patient history, observation, consultation caregiver and medical records by staff
MDS Depression Rating Scale
Combination of physical examination, patient history, observation, consultation caregiver and medical records by staff
-
-
MDS item J1e for delusions MDS item J1i for hallucinations
Volicer 201151
MDS
Combination of physical examination, patient history, observation, consultation caregiver and medical records by staff
MDS items I1ee, E1a, E1d, E1f, E1b, E1i, E1l, E1m for depression
Combination of physical examination, patient history, observation, consultation caregiver and medical records by staff
-
-
MDS for delusions and hallucinations
MDS items B5b, E1b, E4aa, E4da for agitation
Williams 200543
PGC-PIS, score =2, and 0–10 pain numeric rating scale
Registered nurses or licensed practical nurses and interview with overseeing supervisor
CSDD, score =7
Rating by care supervisors, registered nurses and licensed practical nurses
MDS-ADL
Rating by care supervisors, registered nurses and licensed practical nurses
CMAI, any behaviour at least weekly
APAS
SMOI
Zieber 200538
DS-DAT, and a 7-point pain rating scale
Trained facility nurses, palliative care nurse consultants
PAS
Trained facility nurses
-
-
Abbreviations: MDS Minimum Dataset, ADL Activities of Daily Living, GMPI Geriatric Multidimensional Pain and Illness Inventory, GDS-15 Geriatric Depression Scale-15 short version, PRADLI Psychosocial Resistance to Activities of Daily Living Index, GLDS Geriatric Level of Dysfunction Scale, PGC-PIS Philadelphia Geriatric Centre Pain Intensity Scale, CSDD Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, CMAI Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, SMOI Structured Meal Observational Instrument, HAM-D Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, NPI Neuropsychiatric Inventory, PAINAD Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, AAS Adjusted Activity Scale, PPQ Proxy Pain Questionnaire, CNA Certified Nursing Assistant, RMBPC-NH Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist-Nursing Home, BEHAVE-AD Behavioural Pathology in Alzheimer’s disease, PSMS Physical Self Maintenance Scale, VDS Verbal Descriptor Scale, KATZ Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, IADL Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, OARS/IADL Older Americans Recourses and Services/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, VRS Verbal Rating Scale, DQol Dementia Quality of life, APAS Albert Patient activity Scale, DS-DAT Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type, PAS Pittsburgh Agitation Scale
Table 5
Correlates of pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms
Correlates of pain and specified NPS
First author
N
Pain: prevalence
Neuropsychiatric symptoms: prevalence
Correlates of pain with NPS
Quality of study
Ahn 201336
56577
Not reported
Wandering 9 %
AOR 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.73-0.81) with wandering
10
Subsample without psychotropic medication
AOR 0.72 (95 % CI: 0.63-0.83) with wandering
(Adjusted for cognition, ADL, sociodemographics)
Kunik 200534
99
Pain mean 2.4 (SD 1.2)
Delusions/hallucinations mean 0.35 (SD 0.48)
r = 0.15 (p > 0.05) with psychosis
8.5
Leong 200735
225
Pain 44 %, chronic pain 34 %
Anxiety 48 %
SOR 1.8 (95 % CI: 1.0-3.0) with anxiety
8.5
Norton 201042
161
Not reported
BEHAVE-AD mean 6..4 (SD 29.2)
r = 0.15 (p = 0.08) for pain intensity and emotional behaviour problems
9
RMBPC-NH mean 1.45 (SD 0.64)
r = 0.05 (p = 0.58) for pain intensity and resistiveness to care
Torvik 201052
106
Current pain in total group 55 %, in cognitive impaired group 52 %
Negative affect index (DQoL) mean 2.0 (SD 0.75), positive affect/humour index (DQoL) mean 3.4 (SD 0.9)
p < 0.01 for current pain and negative affect
6.5
p = 0.11 for current pain and with positive affect/humour
Tosato 20123
2822
Any pain 19 % (moderate/severe/excruciating pain 13 %)
Behavioural symptoms 37 % Psychiatric symptoms 21 %
AOR = 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.55-1.0) with wandering
11.5
AOR = 1.4 (95 % CI: 1.08-1.8) with resistance to care
AOR 1.5 (95 % CI: 1.07-2.03) with delusions
AOR 1.06 (95 % CI: 0.80-1.41) with verbal abuse
AOR 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.75-1.55) with physical abuse
(Adjusted for age, gender, country, cognitive impairment, number of diseases, ischemic heart disease, stroke, falls, communication problems, and a flare-up of a chronic or recurrent condition)
Volicer 200937
929
Daily pain 29 %, less than daily pain 19 %
Verbally abusive not easily altered 2 %, physically abusive not easily altered 12 %
r = 0.07 (p = 0.03) for pain frequency and verbal abuse
11
AOR = 0.9 (p = 0.53) with resisting care
AOR = 0.7 (p = 1.2) with verbal abuse
AOR = 0.7 (p = 0.16) with physical abuse
Delusions 8 %
(Both multivariate models among others controlled for resisting care)
Hallucinations 9 %
Zieber 200538
58
Not reported
Not reported
r = 0.46 (p < 0.01) for DS-DAT scores and resisting care
8
r = 0.42 (p < 0.01) for DS-DAT scores and aberrant vocalization
Pain rating by palliative care nurse consultants:
r = 0.51 (p < 0.01) with resisting care
r = 0.40 (p < 0.01) with aberrant vocalizations
Pain rating by facility nurse:
r = 0.48 (p < 0.01) with resisting care
r = 0.065 (p < 0.63) with aberrant vocalizations
Correlates of pain and unspecified NPS
First author
N
Pain: prevalence
Neuropsychiatric symptoms: prevalence
Correlates of pain with unspecified NPS
Quality of study
Black 200639
123
Pain 63 %
Psychiatric disorders or behaviour problems 85 %, behaviour problems 67 %
SOR 1.9 (95 % CI: 0.7-5.3) with psychiatric/behaviour problems
6.5
SOR 1.2 (95 % CI: 0.5-2.5) with behaviour problems
Brummel-Smith 200240
104 (excluding those unable to self-report pain)
Moderate-severe pain 60 %
≥1 disruptive behaviours (wandering, verbal disruption, physical aggression, regressive behaviour, hallucinations)
SOR 1.8 (95 % CI: 0.8-4.0) with ≥ 1 disruptive behaviour
7
No-mild pain 40 %
50 subject unable to answer
70 % in dementia sample n = 154
Cipher 20044
234
Persistent pain 72 %
Dysfunctional behaviours mean 4.4 (SD 0.76)
r = 0.22 (p < 0.05) with dysfunctional behaviours
7.5
Cipher 200641
277
Acute pain 29 %
-
r = 0.18 (p < 0.05) with GLDS mean behavioural intensity
7.5
Chronic pain 59 %
Norton 201042
161
Not reported
BEHAVE-AD mean 61.4 (SD 29.2)
r = 0.18 (p = 0.03) for pain intensity and disruptive behaviour problems
9
RMBPC-NH mean 1.45 (SD 0.64)
r = 0.05 (p = 0.53) for pain intensity and global need driven behaviours
Tosato 20123
2822
Any pain 19 % (moderate/severe/excruciating pain 13 %)
Behavioural symptoms 37 %
AOR = 1.4 (95 % CI: 1.04-1.8) with socially inappropriate behaviour
11.5
Psychiatric symptoms 21 %
(Adjusted for age, gender, country, cognitive impairment, number of diseases, ischemic heart disease, stroke, falls, communication problems, and a flare-up of a chronic or recurrent condition)
Williams 200539
331
Pain 21 %, in nh 23 %, in rc/al 20 % (self-report for subgroup mmse > 10 was higher: 39 % and 25 %)
Behavioural symptoms 58 %
OR = 1.1 (95 % CI: 0.49-2.29) and AOR = 1.2 (95 % CI: 0.57-2.36) with behavioural symptoms
10
(Adjusted for: sex, race, age, cognitive status, number of 10 comorbidities, impairments of 7 activities of daily living)
Abbreviations: AOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, ADL Activities of Daily Living, SD Standard Deviation, r correlation coefficient, SOR Self-Calculated Odds Ratio, BEHAVE-AD Behavioural Pathology in Alzheimer’s disease, RMBPC-NH Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist-Nursing Home, DQoL Dementia Quality of life, DS-DAT Discomfort Scale - Dementia of Alzheimer Type, GLDS Geriatric Level of Dysfunction Scale, rc/al residential care/assisted living, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, OR Odds Ratio
Table 6
Correlates of pain with physical function
Correlates of pain and ADL or IADL
First author
N
Pain: prevalence
Physical function: prevalence
Correlates of pain with ADL or IADL
Quality of study
Brummel-Smith 200236
104 (excluding those unable to self-report pain)
Moderate-severe pain 60 %, no-mild pain 40 % (50 subject unable to answer)
≥1 ADL limitations
SOR 1.9 (95 % CI: 0.6-6.0) with ≥ 1 ADL limitation
7
92 % in dementia sample (n = 154)
Cipher 20044
234
Persistent pain 72 %
ADL independency mean 0.09 (SD 0.99)
Correlations with GMPI ’pain and suffering’
7.5
r = −0.04 (α > 0.05) with ADL independency
Shega 200544
115
Any current pain self-report 32 %, caregiver report 53 %
KATZ mean 8.5 (SD 2.7), IADL mean 15.3 (SD 3.9)
For self-report pain
9.5
No association ADL and IADL (p > 0.05)
For caregiver pain report
No association with ADL or IADL (p > 0.05)
Shega 201045
5549
Moderate or greater pain: 35.8 %
Any IADL impairment: 66.5 %
OR = 1.74 (95 % CI: 1.15-2.62) with any iADL impairment
9
(Adjusted for demographics)
Torvik 201048
106
Current pain in total group 55 %, in cognitive impaired group 52 %
Highly or moderate ADL dependent 36 %
p = 0.20 for current pain and ADL
6.5
SOR = 0.5 (95 % CI: 0.2-1.2) for current pain and ADL high/medium v.s. low
Tosato 20123
2822
Any pain 19 % (moderate/severe/excruciating pain 13 %)
No disability 8 %, assistance required 43 %, dependent 49 %
SOR 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.9-1.2) with ADL-dependent
11.5
SOR 0.9 (95 % CI: 0.75-1.09) with ADL assistance required
(Adjusted for age, gender, country, cognitive impairment, number of diseases, ischemic heart disease, stroke, falls, communication problems, and a flare-up of a chronic or recurrent condition)
Correlates of pain and other functional impairments
First author
N
Pain: prevalence
Physical function: prevalence
Correlates of pain with ADL or IADL
Quality of study
Black 200639
123
Pain 63 %
Nutrition/hydration problems total sample 85 %
SOR 1.9 (95 % CI: 0.7-5.3) with nutrition/hydration problems
6.5
Brummel-Smith 200240
104 (excluding those unable to self-report pain)
Moderate-severe pain 60 %, no-mild pain 40 % (50 subject unable to answer)
≥1 ADL limitations
SOR 1.6 (95 % CI: 0.6-4.2) with bladder incontinence
7
92 % in dementia sample (n = 154)
D’Astolfo 200644
140
Pain 64 % (musculoskeletal pain 40 %)
Use of wheel chair 60 %
SOR 1.5 (95 % CI: 0.7-3.0) with use of wheel chair or bedridden
7
Requires assistance 34 %
SOR 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.5-2.0) with requires assistance
(Analyses in sample of no dementia-severe dementia)
Lin 201146
112
Observed pain 37 % (PAINAD > =2)
Being restrained 46 %; observed care activities: bathing 43 %, assisted transfer 31 %, self-transfer 26 %
OR = 5.4 (95 % CI: 2.3-12.5) and AOR = 3.0 (95 % CI: 1.0-8.7) with being restrained
12
OR = 23.4 (95 % CI: 3.0-188) and AOR = 19.2 (95 % CI: 2.3-162) with bathing
OR = 29.7 (95 % CI: 3.6-242) and AOR = 11.3 (95 % CI: 1.2-102) with assisted transfer, both compared to self-transfer
(Adjusted for gender, age, wound, restraint, tube present in body, recent fall, severity of dementia and type of activity)
Williams 200543
331
Pain 21 %, in nh 23 %, in rc/al 20 % (self-report for subgroup MMSE > 10 was higher: 39 % and 25 %)
Low activity 47 %, immobile 12 %
OR = 0.65 (95 % CI: 0.38-1.11) and AOR = 0.64 (95 % CI: 0.37-1.10) with low activity
10
Low food intake 53 %
OR = 1.1 (95 % CI: 0.49-2.29) and AOR = 0.8 (95 % CI: 0.37-1.69) with immobility
Low fluid intake 51 %
OR = 1.18 (95 % CI: 0.64-2.17) and AOR = 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.56-1.87) with low food intake
OR = 1.20 (95 % CI: 0.67-2.15) and AOR 1.14 (95 % CI: 0.66-1.99) with low fluid intake
(Adjusted for: sex, race, age, cognitive status, number of 10 comorbidities, impairments of 7 activities of daily living)
Abbreviations: SOR Self-Calculated Odds Ratio, ADL Activities of Daily Living, SD Standard Deviation, r correlation coefficient, GMPI Geriatric Multidimensional Pain and Illness Inventory, PAINAD Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia, OR Odds Ratio, AOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, KATZ Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, IADL Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, nh nursing home, rc/al residential care/assisted living, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: Association between pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and physical function in dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Annelore H. van Dalen-Kok
Marjoleine Pieper
Margot de Waal
Albert Lukas
Bettina S. Husebo
Wilco P. Achterberg
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Geriatrics / Ausgabe 1/2015
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0085-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

BMC Geriatrics 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.