Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Erratum

Erratum to: Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study

verfasst von: Jane Candlish, Alexander Pate, Matthew Sperrin, Tjeerd van Staa, on behalf of GetReal Work Package 2

Erschienen in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Ausgabe 1/2017

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.​1186/​s12874-017-0295-7.

Erratum

After publication of the original article [1], it came to the authors’ attention that there was an error affecting the References. The published Reference 14 [2] is incorrect, and should have cited a different article by Pate et al. [3].
Pate et al. [3] should have been included in the Reference list as 14, and the subsequent references (and citations within the article text) should have been renumbered.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu J, Zhu S, Yao GL, Mohammed MA, Marshall T. Patient factors influencing the prescribing of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in UK general practice: a national retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):1–10. Wu J, Zhu S, Yao GL, Mohammed MA, Marshall T. Patient factors influencing the prescribing of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in UK general practice: a national retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):1–10.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pate A, Candlish J, Sperrin M, Van Staa TP. Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design. BMC Med Res Meth. 2016;16:109.CrossRef Pate A, Candlish J, Sperrin M, Van Staa TP. Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design. BMC Med Res Meth. 2016;16:109.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study
verfasst von
Jane Candlish
Alexander Pate
Matthew Sperrin
Tjeerd van Staa
on behalf of GetReal Work Package 2
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0326-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe