Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Erratum

Erratum to: Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status

verfasst von: Serghei Malkov, John A. Shepherd, Christopher G. Scott, Rulla M. Tamimi, Lin Ma, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Fergus Couch, Matthew R. Jensen, Amir P. Mahmoudzadeh, Bo Fan, Aaron Norman, Kathleen R. Brandt, V. Shane Pankratz, Celine M. Vachon, Karla Kerlikowske

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research | Ausgabe 1/2017

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.​1186/​s13058-016-0778-1.
Abkürzungen
AUC
Area under the curve
BI-RADS
Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System
BMI
Body mass index
cc
Craniocaudal
CI
Confidence interval
DCIS
Ductal carcinoma in situ
ER
Estrogen receptor
FD
fractal dimension
FT
Fourier transform
GLCM
Gray-level co-occurrence matrix
MCMAM
Mayo Clinic Mammography Study
MMHS
Mayo Mammography Health Study
NGTDM
Neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix
NHS
Nurses’ Health Study
OR
Odds ratio
PD
Percent density
SD
Standard deviation
SFMR
San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer SPORE and San Francisco Mammography Registry
UCSF
University of California San Francisco

Erratum

After publication of the original article [1], the author noticed some errors to the article [1] which are included in this erratum. All errors reported in this erratum have been updated in the original article [1].
In the ‘Results’ section of the article Abstract, the sentence “Entropy was associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer” should be "Entropy was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer”. In the same section, the variables "FD_TH10", "FD_TH15", "FD_TH60", "FD_TH85", "FD_TH75", and "FD_TH75" should include an additional underscore so they are presented as: "FD_TH_10", "FD_TH_15", "FD_TH_60", "FD_TH_85", "FD_TH_75", and "FD_TH_75", respectively. All variables should be italicized.
In the section entitled ‘Breast texture measurements’, the sentence “the image with only constant grayscale pixels has Energy equal to 0" should state "the image with only constant grayscale pixels has Energy equal to 1".
In the ‘Results’ section of the article [1], the variable “FD_TH_75” included in sentence: “The top left and bottom left images show a top 20th percent tile value of FD_TH_75” should be included in italics.
In the ‘Abbreviations’ section, “BGTDM” should be "NGTDM". The correct version of the ‘Abbreviations’ is included in this erratum and has been updated in the original article [1].
In Table 1, in the column “Texture feature name”, the names of variables should be in italics. In addition in Table 5, in the column “Feature”, all variables should also be included in italics. The revised versions of Tables 1 and 5 are included in this erratum and have been updated in the original article [1].
Table 1
Image texture features that are currently defined for all study participants
Analysis Groups
Texture Features
Texture feature name
Reference
Gray-level Histogram
Standard deviation
STD
[7, 22, 24–26]
Skewness
Skewness
Kurtosis
Kurtosis
Balance
Balance
Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)
GLCM Energy
Energy
[24, 25, 27, 29]
GLCM Entropy
Entropy
GLCM Dissimilarity
Dissimilarity
GLCM Contrast
Contrast
GLCM Homogeneity
Homogeneity
GLCM Correlation
Correlation
GLCM Mean
GLCM Mean
GLCM Variance
GLCM Variance
Neighborhood Gray-tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM)
NGTDM Coarseness
NGTDM Coarseness
[24, 28, 29]
NGTDM Contrast
NGTDM Contrast
NGTDM Complexity
Complexity
NGTDM Strength
Strength
NGTDM Busyness
Busyness
Edge Frequency Analysis
Mean Gradient
Mean_Gradient
[29]
Fourier Transform Analysis, Power Spectrum
RMS
FT_RMS
[29]
FMP (first moment of power spectrum)
FT_FMP
SMP (second moment of power spectrum)
FT_SMP
FD from power spectrum exponent
FT_FD
Fractal Analysis
Intercept of the plot of the standard deviation of the high frequency image as a function of the size the kernel
CD_Yint
[29–31]
Continuous Dimension (CD), slope and intercept
CD_Slope
HZ_PROJ
HZ_PROJ
FD of the standard deviation
FD_Sigma
FD of image using thresholds from 5%-85%
FD_TH_5: FD_TH_85
FD of the surface of thebreast considering the gray value represent the height
FD_CALDWELL
FD, Minkowski method
FD_Minkowski
Table 5
Risk associated of either DCIS or Invasive Cancer for each feature
Feature
DCIS
Invasive
  
ER-
ER+
  
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
p-value*
p-het**
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
p-value *
p-het**
N case/control
254/1659
908/1659
  
116/1291
746/1291
  
FD_TH_75
0.87 (0.74, 1.01)
0.87 (0.78, 0.96)
0.010
0.98
0.84 (0.67, 1.06)
0.88 (0.79, 0.99)
0.048
0.72
Energy
0.88 (0.76, 1.02)
0.88 (0.80, 0.96)
0.011
0.93
0.85 (0.69, 1.05)
0.86 (0.78, 0.95)
0.009
0.90
Entropy
1.18 (1.02, 1.38)
1.13 (1.03, 1.25)
0.010
0.60
1.16 (0.93, 1.44)
1.15 (1.03, 1.28)
0.024
0.96
FD_TH_70
0.85 (0.72, 1.00)
0.87 (0.79, 0.97)
0.015
0.75
0.84 (0.67, 1.06)
0.89 (0.79, 1.00)
0.085
0.64
FD_TH_80
0.90 (0.77, 1.04)
0.89 (0.81, 0.98)
0.034
0.90
0.85 (0.68, 1.05)
0.89 (0.80, 1.00)
0.066
0.64
FD_TH_10
1.19 (1.04, 1.38)
1.09 (0.99, 1.19)
0.022
0.21
1.03 (0.84, 1.26)
1.06 (0.96, 1.18)
0.479
0.75
Kurtosis
0.86 (0.73, 1.00)
0.90 (0.81, 0.99)
0.032
0.58
0.98 (0.78, 1.22)
0.91 (0.81, 1.01)
0.216
0.53
FD_TH_65
0.84 (0.71, 0.99)
0.89 (0.80, 0.99)
0.035
0.49
0.83 (0.65, 1.06)
0.91 (0.81, 1.03)
0.170
0.46
FD_Minkowski
0.90 (0.74, 1.08)
0.86 (0.77, 0.97)
0.042
0.71
0.77 (0.59, 1.01)
0.89 (0.78, 1.01)
0.063
0.32
Busyness
1.15 (1.00, 1.33)
1.09 (1.00, 1.19)
0.053
0.46
0.92 (0.75, 1.14)
1.09 (0.99, 1.21)
0.128
0.12
Homogeneity
1.05 (0.90, 1.22)
1.13 (1.03, 1.24)
0.042
0.36
1.06 (0.86, 1.31)
1.12 (1.01, 1.24)
0.091
0.62
Dissimilarity
0.96 (0.83, 1.12)
0.89 (0.81, 0.98)
0.057
0.35
0.95 (0.77, 1.17)
0.89 (0.81, 0.99)
0.110
0.61
FD_TH_60
0.85 (0.71, 1.02)
0.9 (0.8, 1.01)
0.077
0.56
0.9 (0.69, 1.15)
0.92 (0.81, 1.04)
0.348
0.85
FD_TH_85
0.92 (0.79, 1.06)
0.91 (0.83, 1)
0.130
0.98
0.89 (0.72, 1.09)
0.91 (0.82, 1.01)
0.173
0.77
FD_TH_15
1.2 (1.04, 1.39)
1.06 (0.97, 1.16)
0.034
0.09
0.96 (0.78, 1.18)
1.05 (0.95, 1.16)
0.572
0.43
Results presented as OR per 1 SD in normalized feature after adjustment for age, family history, PD, and study
*p-value refers to 2 degree of freedom to test for evidence of associated with DCIS or invasive cancer
**Heterogeneity p-value to test for differences in effect between tumor subgroups
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status
verfasst von
Serghei Malkov
John A. Shepherd
Christopher G. Scott
Rulla M. Tamimi
Lin Ma
Kimberly A. Bertrand
Fergus Couch
Matthew R. Jensen
Amir P. Mahmoudzadeh
Bo Fan
Aaron Norman
Kathleen R. Brandt
V. Shane Pankratz
Celine M. Vachon
Karla Kerlikowske
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0797-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Breast Cancer Research 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.