Erratum
Following publication of the original article [1], it was brought to our attention that there were a few errors in Table 2:
Table 2
Outcome comparisons between REBOA and ACC
REBOA (n = 636) | ACC (n = 267) |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
Disposition at discharge | <0.001*
| ||
Died (in-hospital mortality) | 405/607 (67%) | 210/233 (90%) | |
Transferred | 118/607 (19%) | 11/233 (4.7%) | |
Home | 83/607 (14%) | 12/233 (5.2%) | |
Other | 1/607 (0.1%) | 0/233 (0.0%) | |
Disposition at ED | <0.001*
| ||
Died (ED mortality) | 137/625 (22%) | 130/264 (49%) | |
ICU admission | 472/625 (76%) | 129/264 (49%) | |
Ward admission | 137/625 (22%) | 4/264 (1.5%) | |
Other | 5/625 (1.8%) | 1/264 (0.4%) | |
CU admission should read: ICU admission
Anzeige
11/233 (1.8%) should read: 11/233 (4.7%)
12/233 (2.0%) should read: 12/233 (5.2%)
The corrected table is presented in this erratum [Table 2].
Furthermore, the sentence “…only 14% (83/607) of REBOA patients and 2.0% (12/233) of ACC patients could leave the hospital and go home.” in the Discussion section should as a consequence read: “…only 14% (83/607) of REBOA patients and 5.2% (12/233) of ACC patients could leave the hospital and go home.”
Anzeige
This has now been corrected in this erratum.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.