Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017

12.05.2017 | Erratum

Erratum to: Surgeons’ views on sling tensioning during surgery for female stress urinary incontinence

verfasst von: Ali Borazjani, Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky, Jianbo Li, Howard B. Goldman

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Erratum to: Int Urogynecol J
Table 1
Demographics of the respondents
Parameter
Value
Totaln a
Age, mean (SD)
48.1 (9.6)
596
Regions, % (n)
 
596
 North America
37.1 (221)
 
 Europe
29 (173)
 South America
18.8 (112)
 Asia
2.7 (16)
 Central America
2.7 (16)
 Oceania
5.4 (32)
 Middle East
2.3 (14)
 Africa
2 (12)
Practice Setting, % (n)b
 
596
 University-based academic practice
38.6 (230)
 
 Multispecialty group practice
9.6 (57)
 Single specialty group practice
15.3 (91)
 Public hospital practice
31.5 (188)
 Private hospital practice
22 (131)
Primary Specialty, % (n)c
 
596
 Gynecology
63.1 (376)
 
  Urogynecology
54.0 (322)
  Gynecology
23.3 (139)
  Obstetrics & Gynecology
12.1 (72)
 Urology
36.6 (218)
  Female Urology
21.5 (128)
  Urology
20.5 (122)
 Other
0.33 (2)
Years since residency, % (n)
 
596
 0 to 5 years
18 (107)
 
 6 to 10 years
17.8 (106)
 11 to 20 years
31.2 (186)
 Greater than 20 years
33.1 (197)
Fellowship Trained, % (n)
56.5 (337)
596
Percentage of practice devoted to PFDs, median (IQR)
60 (40–80)
596
Annual # of sling operations, % (n)
 
585
 0
0.5 (3)
 
 1 to 10
6.7 (39)
 11 to 20
15 (88)
 21 to 30
18.5 (108)
 31 to 40
15.9 (93)
 41 to 50
12.3 (72)
 Greater than 50
31.1 (182)
Annual number of sling revisions performed for obstructive complications, % (N)
 
584
 0
24.5 (143)
 
 1 to 5
61 (356)
 6 to 10
7.2 (42)
 11 to 15
2.9 (17)
 16 to 20
1.7 (10)
 Greater than 20
2.7 (16)
Annual number of sling revisions performed for other complications, % (N)
 
585
 0
19.5 (1)
 
 1 to 5
61 (357)
 6 to 10
11.1 (65)
 11 to 20
4.8 (28)
 Greater than 20
3.6 (21)
Estimated percentage of own patients undergoing sling revisions by outside surgeons, % (n)
 
585
 0 to 5%
85.5 (500)
 
 6 to 10%
13 (76)
 
 11 to 25%
1.2 (7)
 Greater than 25%
0.3 (2)
aIndicates the total number of respondents that completed the question
bRespondents were allowed to choose one, or if they practiced in two or more settings equally, two that are most applicable. As such, percentages do not add up to 100% or the specified number of participants
cRespondents were allowed to select all specialties that applied to them. Those who selected obstetrics & gynecology, urogynecology, and/or gynecology but not urology and/or female urology were considered gynecologists. Similarly, those who selected urology and/or female urology but not obstetrics & gynecology and/or gynecology were considered urologists. Two respondents only selected "other" as their primary specialty
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: Surgeons’ views on sling tensioning during surgery for female stress urinary incontinence
verfasst von
Ali Borazjani
Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky
Jianbo Li
Howard B. Goldman
Publikationsdatum
12.05.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3350-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Urogynecology Digest

Urogynecology digest

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.