Erratum
Following the publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that there is a recurring error in the ‘Results’ section of the ‘Abstract’ and the ‘Stunting’ section of the ‘Results’.
The sentence: “…children were five times (OR: 5.5; CI: 3.37, 9.02; β = 1.71) more likely to be stunted at non-NIP sites compared to non-NIP sites” should instead read: “… children were five times more likely to be stunted at non-NIP sites compared to NIP sites”.
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.