Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Erratum

Erratum to: understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: a national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014–2015

verfasst von: Marcella H. Boynton, Robert P. Agans, J. Michael Bowling, Noel T. Brewer, Erin L. Sutfin, Adam O. Goldstein, Seth M. Noar, Kurt M. Ribisl

Erschienen in: BMC Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2017

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.​1186/​s12889-016-3151-5

Erratum

As reported in the original paper [1], the Center for Regulatory Research on Tobacco Communication conducted a telephone survey in 2014–2015 with a national sample of adults ages 18 and older living in the United States (N = 5014). Poverty level was determined using the household size and income reported by the respondents and applying the federal poverty numbers available from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 2014. A coding error was made during the data recoding process such that 2.7% of respondents (n = 129) were incorrectly classified as living above the poverty line. Below are updated Tables 1, 2 and 4 presenting both the original and corrected estimates. No substantive conclusions reported in the paper were affected by this correction.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics as compared to U.S. Census and other national surveys, CRRTC National Adult (≥18 years) Phone Survey 2014–2015
 
Unweighted
Weighted
National estimate
% (n)
%
95% CI
%
ORIGINALLY REPORTED ESTIMATES
 Household Poverty
  At or above federal poverty level
84.0% (3901)
85.7%
(83.8–87.5)
84.6% [2]
  Below federal poverty level
16.0% (745)
14.3%
(12.5–16.2)
15.4% [2]
CORRECTED ESTIMATES
 Household Poverty
  At or above federal poverty level
81.3% (3772)
82.5%
(80.4–84.7)
84.6% [2]
  Below federal poverty level
18.7% (868)
17.5%
(15.3–19.6)
15.4% [2]
[2] US Census
Table 2
Percentage of smokers by selected demographic characteristics, CRRTC National Adult (≥18 years) Phone Survey 2014–2015
 
Weighted
National estimate
%
95% CI
%
95% CI
ORIGINALLY REPORTED ESTIMATES
 Household Poverty
  At or above federal poverty level
15.4%
(13.5–17.3)
15.2%
(14.6–15.9)
  Below federal poverty level
29.3%
(23.9–34.7)
29.2%
(27.5–31.0)
CORRECTED ESTIMATES
 Household Poverty
  At or above federal poverty level
15.1%
(13.2–17.1)
15.2%
(14.6–15.9)
  Below federal poverty level
27.9%
(22.9–32.9)
29.2%
(27.5–31.0)
Table 4
Subset of Communication-related Variables – CRRTC National Adult Phone Survey 2014–2015
 
Weighted Proportion or M with 95% Confidence Interval
ORIGINALLY REPORTED ESTIMATES
ORIGINALLY REPORTED ESTIMATES
CORRECTED ESTIMATES
Total
Living in poverty
Living in poverty
Information Seeking
 Have you ever looked for information on chemicals in cigarettes and cigarette smoke?
  Yes
27.5% (25.4–29.7)
25.7% (19.7–31.6)
24.1% (18.8–29.4)
  No
72.5% (70.3–74.6)
74.3% (68.4–80.3)
75.9% (70.6–81.2)
 In which 1 of these 3 places would you most like to see information on chemicals in cigarettes and cigarette smoke?
  On cigarette packs
54.8% (52.4–57.3)
54.3% (47.4–61.2)
54.6% (48.0–61.2)
  In stores
15.0% (13.2–16.7)
18.3% (13.2–23.5)
18.3% (13.6–23.1)
  Online
28.7% (26.5–30.9)
25.5% (19.7–31.4)
25.5% (20.2–30.9)
  Doesn’t know, refused, or doesn’t want information
1.5% (0.9–2.08)
1.8% (0.3–3.3)
1.5% (0.2–2.7)
Constituent Awareness
 Aware of 0 of 4 constituents in cigarette smoke
37.5% (35.0–40.1)
43.1% (35.7–50.4)
42.5% (35.5–49.5)
 Aware of 1 of 4 constituents in cigarette smoke
35.8% (33.4–38.2)
34.7% (28.2–41.2)
33.6% (27.6–39.7)
 Aware of 2 of 4 constituents in cigarette smoke
18.7% (16.7–20.7)
13.6% (9.8–17.5)
15.4% (9.3–21.6)
 Aware of 3 of 4 constituents in cigarette smoke
5.6% (4.6–6.5)
5.7% (3.0–8.4)
4.9% (2.7–7.2)
 Aware of 4 of 4 constituents in cigarette smoke
2.4% (1.7–3.1)
2.9% (0.8–5.1)
3.5% (1.4–5.7)
Knowledge of and Trust for FDA and U.S. Federal Government
 Have you ever heard of the FDA or Food and Drug Administration?
  Yes
94.6% (93.4–95.8)
87.5% (83.0–92.0)
87.1% (83.0–91.2)
  No
5.4% (4.2–6.6)
12.5% (8.0–17.0)
12.9% (8.8–17.0)
 Can the FDA effectively regulate tobacco products?
  Yes
65.2% (62.6–67.8)
67.8% (61.3–74.1)
69.9% (63.9–75.9)
  No
34.8% (32.2–37.4)
32.2% (25.8–38.7)
30.1% (24.1–36.1)
 How much trust do you have in the federal government? M score, 0 = none at all - 4 = a great deal
2.0 (1.9–2.0)
2.2 (2.0–2.4)
3.1 (2.9–3.2)
Note. Point estimates in bold text were found to be significantly different from their respective comparison group (e.g., smokers were compared to non-smokers, young adults compared to older adults, etc.) using either PROC SURVEYFREQ or PROC SURVEYREG to make the comparisons
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boynton M, Agans R, Bowling J, Brewer N, Sutfin E, Goldstein A, et al. Understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: A national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014–2015. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3151-5. Boynton M, Agans R, Bowling J, Brewer N, Sutfin E, Goldstein A, et al. Understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: A national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014–2015. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1). doi:10.​1186/​s12889-016-3151-5.
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: a national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014–2015
verfasst von
Marcella H. Boynton
Robert P. Agans
J. Michael Bowling
Noel T. Brewer
Erin L. Sutfin
Adam O. Goldstein
Seth M. Noar
Kurt M. Ribisl
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4760-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe