Background
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. In the USA, DLBCL represents approximately 30 % of all new lymphoma cases per year and is the fifth most common cancer [
1]. Current standard front-line therapy for DLBCL patients involves rituximab immunotherapy and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Approximately 70–80 % of patients experience some form of remission, but relapsed/refractory DLBCL occurs in 30–40 % of patients within 2–3 years, and this patient subset has poor salvage therapy options [
1‐
4].
DLBCL is a molecularly heterogeneous disease [
5,
6]. Approximately 30–40 % of cases of DLBCL are characterized by recurrent chromosomal translocations involving
BCL6/3q27,
BCL2/18q21.3, and
MYC/8q24.4 in about 30, 20, and 10 % of DLBCL cases, respectively. In recent years, the concept of double-hit lymphoma (DHL) has received much attention in the literature. DHL is defined by a chromosomal breakpoint affecting the
MYC/8q24.2 locus in combination with another recurrent oncogene breakpoint, usually
BCL2 and less often
BCL6 or rarely other genes.
MYC/BCL2 DHL represents approximately 70 % of all cases of DHL. Double-hit lymphoma (all types) represents about 5 % of all cases of DLBCL and affected patients generally have an aggressive clinical course with poor prognosis, despite combination chemotherapy, with a median overall survival less than 1–2 years [
7].
To date, exploratory studies to determine the pathogenesis of DHL have been limited, in part due to the lack of a validated lymphoma cell model that is both immunophenotypically and genetically consistent with the original primary DHL tumor. To our knowledge, there have been only a small number of published manuscripts demonstrating the establishment and characterization of defined DHL cell lines. The CJ cell line that we established in 1990 before recognition of the clinical importance of DHL is believed to be the first DHL cell line showing both
MYC and
BCL2 gene rearrangements [
8]. In 2003, we established another
MYC/BCL2 DHL cell line, designated EJ-1, that morphologically resembled DLBCL [
9], and recently, Hooper et al. [
10] described the establishment of a novel
MYC/BCL2 DHL cell line, U-2973. Several recent studies indicate that the OCI-LY18, Sc-1, and CARNAVAL DLBCL cell lines also appear to demonstrate
MYC/BCL2 double-hit characteristics [
11,
12], but a comprehensive genetic analysis of these cell lines has not been published. Collectively, these cell lines should provide excellent models to study the pathophysiology and translational biology of
MYC/BCL2 DHL. However, because these cell lines were never genetically authenticated against the primary tumor, the exact origin of these cells remains unclear. Thus, additional, validated DHL cell lines are a prerequisite for increasing our understanding and therapeutic potential of DHL.
Herein, we described the establishment and characterization of a novel MYC/BCL2 DHL cell line with morphologic features of DLBCL, designated RC, that closely shares an immunophenotype and cytogenetic features of the primary B cell tumor at diagnosis.
Discussion
Although others had reported cases of DLBCL with
MYC and
BCL2 rearrangements previously [
17‐
20], Aukema and colleagues [
16] in 2011 published an important review article that introduced the concept of DHL. Aukema and colleagues defined DHL as a neoplasm characterized by a
MYC rearrangement combined with another genetic abnormality, such as
BCL2,
BCL3,
BCL6, or other genes. Currently, over 400 cases of DHL have been reported in the literature, with the combination of
MYC and
BCL2 being, by far, the most common. These studies have shown that patients with double-hit lymphoma associated with
MYC/8q24.2 and
IGH-BCL2/t(14;18) have an aggressive disease, clinically characterized by B type symptoms, advanced clinical stage, a high International prognostic index (IPI), poor response to standard front-line R-CHOP or more aggressive therapies, and a very poor prognosis with a median survival of 1–2 years [
7,
21]. As a result of the poor prognosis, DHL is currently a subject of intense clinical and research interest because there is no consensus therapeutic approach for these patients and the conceptual/mechanistic basis underlying the DHL remains unclear [
15].
A major limitation to the successful treatment of patients with
MYC/BCL2 DHL is an improved understanding of disease pathogenesis, mechanisms of chemotherapeutic resistance, and knowledge of potential therapeutic targets for which new therapies can be rationally designed. We suggest that the RC cell line reported here is of interest and will be a useful tool that will be helpful in contributing to an improved understanding of
MYC/BCL2 DHL. The RC cell line has the advantage of having been well studied initially, with further relevant follow-up studies. Its derivation from a patient with a DHL is clearly identified by STR analysis. The RC cells have usual morphologic features of DLBCL and the
MYC and
BCL2 abnormalities are well documented by conventional cytogenetic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The
MYC rearrangement involves
IGK gene mapped at 2p12 region corroborating the t(2;8)(p12;q24.2) identified by constitutional cytogenetic analysis. RC cells have a germinal center B cell immunophenotype, as is the case for almost all published cases of
MYC/BCL2 DHL, and a complete immunophenotype is shown by flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis. Similar to the original lymphoma cells, RC cells showed dim/low CD20 expression. The molecular mechanism(s) resulting in decreased expression of CD20 in RC cells and in DHL are unclear and have not been explored [
13]. The decreased expression of CD20 in DHL suggests that the use of second-generation monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 may be fruitful because these engineered antibodies are reportedly more effective than rituximab in inducing complement-dependent cytotoxicity, particularly in tumors with decreased CD20 antigen density [
22,
23].
Several general findings have emerged from recently published DHL retrospective series [
7]. These studies show that patients with DHL often present with extranodal disease, central nervous system (CNS) involvement is more common, and higher international prognostic index (IPI) scores. However, retrospective studies have not been able to contribute to a deeper understanding of DHL or provide clues to potential therapeutic targets that would enable substantial progress in therapy. Using RPPA analysis, we have identified at least two important growth/survival pathways (integrin-MEK-ELK1 and the insulin-AKT-mTOR) that are highly activated in RC cells. RC cells are highly sensitive to small molecule inhibitors of the AKT-mTOR pathway. Although it has already been shown that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is highly active in many B cell malignancies, including DLBCL [
24], our study is the first to demonstrate the activation of these growth/survival pathways in a representative DHL-DLBCL cell line. However, a recent study showed that the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 can potentiate the activity of the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat in pre-clinical models of DLBCL, including DHL cell lines with overexpression of bcl-2 and MYC [
12], further suggesting activation of Akt/mTOR activation in DHL. Further studies in more DHL cell lines as well as primary cells are required to validate whether the integrin-MEK-ELK1 and the insulin-AKT-mTOR pathways are commonly activated and can be targeted in DHL. Targeting the PI3K/mTOR pathway as was shown in this study is just one example of the utility of the RC cell line in biomarker research and drug development. New drugs, particularly targeted therapeutic agents [
25‐
27], are increasingly being developed and entered the clinic in recent years. Therefore, a fully characterized
MYC/BCL2 DHL cell line with morphologic features of DLBCL, like RC, will be valuable for researchers in identifying novel targets and pre-clinical screening studies of novel therapies that potentially can benefit patients [
28].
Although not a specific focus of this study, it seems that the concept of DHL has some limitations. It appears likely that disease and resistance mechanisms in
MYC/BCL2 DHL are likely to differ from
MYC/BCL6 DHL and therefore the designation of DHL is descriptive but not sufficiently specific. Even with the most common
MYC/BCL2 DHL, one of our early cell lines, CJ, was derived from an elderly woman with typical low-grade follicular lymphoma, with the usual t(14:18)(q32;q21.3) who was initially successfully treated with conventional CHOP chemotherapy, achieving a remission lasting several years. This patient subsequently relapsed with aggressive
MYC/BCL2 DHL with a complex karyotype and multiple other uncharacterized cytogenetic abnormalities. Interestingly, this DHL did not show the expected DLBCL morphology but retained the grade 1 (centrocytic or small cleaved cell) morphology [
7], while clearly progressing from indolent to aggressive phenotype both in vitro and in vivo (SCID XT). CJ cells are not only DHL cells but also currently the only known centrocytic cell line, with a unique pathophysiology, suggesting that
MYC/BCL2 DHL is heterogeneous and may provide insights into pathophysiologic mechanisms such as large cell transformation of follicular lymphoma. Although we believe the RC cell line will be an excellent experimental tool to study
MYC/BCL2 double-hit lymphoma, other additional cell lines, for example to study
MYC/BCL6 double-hit lymphomas, will also be needed to better understand these less common DHL tumors.
In summary, in this study, we report the establishment and characterization of a novel MYC/BCL2 DHL cell line with morphologic features of DLBCL, RC, that immunophenotypically and cytogenetically closely resembles the primary B cell tumor at diagnosis. We believe that the newly characterized DHL cell line will provide useful in vitro and in vivo models for translational and biological studies related to human DHL, which is refractory to current therapy and urgently needs novel therapeutic approaches.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Satellite Tissue Bank provided the patient samples used for these studies. With informed consent from the patient, the collected primary cells were purified from ascites by Ficoll centrifugation (Ficoll-Paque Plus; GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ), washed in phosphate-buffered saline twice, and resuspended in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) containing 15 % heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM glutamine, and 50 μg/mL gentamycin at a concentration of 5–10 × 106 cells/mL (40 mL) in 75-cm2 flasks. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with a 5 % CO2 atmosphere. The medium was exchanged every 3–5 days depending on the cell growth rate. The cells were examined daily using an inverted microscope and counted weekly with a standard hemocytometer using trypan blue dye exclusion. No external growth factors or stimulatory cytokines were added during the establishment of the RC cell line.
Cell growth and viability assay
Cell viability was assessed using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Assay (Promega). Cells were plated in triplicates at 1–2 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plate with increase concentrations of AZD8055 (Selleckchem) in 100 μl total volume. Cell viability was assessed at 72 h after treatment.
Western blot analysis
Cell lysates were prepared and immunoblotted as previously described [
29,
30].
Flow cytometry
Eight-color flow cytometry analysis was performed with FACS Canto II instruments (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) using commercially available reagents on patient samples collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or cell line cells in culture medium. The cell population was gated using right-angle light scatter and CD45 expression. The panel of monoclonal antibodies used included those specific for CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD10, CD11c, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD30, CD34 CD38, CD43, CD44, CD45, CD56, CD200, and surface kappa and lambda light chains. All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences. Data were analyzed using FCS Express software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). Antigen expression was scored as positive based on a significant shift in staining in comparison to a negative autofluorescence (empty channel) control.
Conventional cytogenetic analysis
RC cells were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin for 72 h before conventional G-banded karyotyping was performed with metaphase cells derived from tumor cell cultures. Briefly, metaphase cells were obtained after hypotonic treatment and fixation with 3:1 methanol-acetic acid solution using automatic harvesting system. Cell suspensions derived from the automatic harvesting system were dropped onto cleaned slides. G-banding was performed after the slides were dried at 60 °C overnight. Chromosome analysis and karyotyping, after the use of Genetix metaphase automatic scanning system, were performed with the CytoVision system. Twenty metaphases were fully analyzed as per standard protocols.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on interphase nuclei from the cell culture using a dual-color, break apart MYC probe and IGH/BCL2 dual-color, dual-fusion translocation probes (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL), as described previously. The cutoff to define a positive result for rearrangement of MYC, and IGH/BCL2 probe is 3.8 and 0.1 %, respectively. A total of 200 interphase cells were analyzed.
Short tandem repeat DNA fingerprinting
Genomic DNA was isolated from the original tumor and the RC cell line using a Qiagen DNA purification kit (Valencia, CA). DNA fingerprinting of lymphoma cells was performed by the Institutional Characterized Cell Line core facility at MD Anderson using the STR method. Short tandem repeats are regions of microsatellite instability with defined tri- or tetra-nucleotide repeats that are located throughout the chromosomes. A PCR-based method using primers on non-repetitive flanking regions to generate PCR products of different sizes based on the number of repeats in the region was performed; the size of the products was determined by capillary electrophoresis. Extracted DNA was analyzed using the Power Plex 16HS System from Promega (Madison, WI). The relatedness of the original tumor and the RC cell line was determined by comparing the STR loci profiles of the respective samples.
Epstein-Barr virus PCR amplification
EBV genotyping was performed by PCR using genomic DNA to amplify a common region of the
EBNA1 and
EBNA2 gene using a PCR kit from Promega with the following set of primers: EBNA1-F: GGT AGA AGG CCA TTT TTC CAC; EBNA1-R: CTC CAT CGT CAA AGC TGC AC; EBNA2-F: CAG GTA CAT GCC AAC AAC CTT; EBNA2-R: CCA ACA AAG ATT GTT AGT GGA AT. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C 2 min, 40 cycles of 94 °C 1 min, 60 °C 90 s, 72 °C 4 min, followed by 72 °C for 10 min [
31]. The EBV-negative Mino and the EBV-positive Granta mantle cell lymphoma cell lines were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Xeno-transplant of RC cells in severed combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice
All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the MD Anderson Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). For in vivo studies, 6-week-old female immumodeficient NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidI12rg
tm1Wj1/SzJ mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the SCID Mouse Barrier Facility at MD Anderson. RC cells (10 × 106) were injected intraperitoneally into the mice using a 27-gauge needle.
Reverse-phase protein array (RPPA)
The RPPA Core Facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center performed the RPPA analysis and antibody validation [
32]. For total protein lysate preparation, media were removed, and cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing complete protease and PhosSTOPphosphatase inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) and 1 mM Na3VO4. Lysis buffer (1 % Triton X-100, 50 mMHEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM NaPPi, 10 % glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 10 μg/mLaprotinin). Samples were vortexed frequently on ice and then centrifuged. Protein lysates were adjusted to a 1 μg/μL concentration, and a serial dilution of five concentrations was printed, with 10 % of the samples replicated for quality control (2470 Arrayer; Aushon Biosystems) on nitrocellulose-coated slides (Grace Bio-Labs). Immunostaining was performed using a DakoCytomation-catalyzed system and diaminobenzidine colorimetric reaction. Slides were scanned on a flatbed scanner to produce 16-bit tiff images. Spot intensities were analyzed and quantified using Array-Pro Analyzer to generate spot signal intensities. Relative protein levels for each sample were determined by interpolation of each dilution curve from the “standard curve” constructed by a script in R written Bioinformatics. All the data points were normalized for protein loading and transformed to linear values that can be used for bar graph. Normalized linear value was transformed to log2 value, and then median-centered for hierarchical cluster analysis and for heatmap generation. The heatmap was generated in Cluster 3.0 (
http://cluster2.software.informer.com/3.0/) as a hierarchical cluster using Pearson correlation and a center metric. The resulting heatmap was visualized in Treeview (
http://rana.lbl.gov/EisenSoftware.htm) and presented as a high resolution .bmp format. Two hundred eighty-five unique antibodies and four secondary antibody negative controls were analyzed.
Competing interests
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Authors’ contributions
LVP and RJF were the principal investigators who directed all experiments. GL performed and analyzed and interpreted the conventional and molecular cytogenetic studies. ATT and JC performed cell culture, PCR, and immunoblots. LJM reviewed the morphologic findings. PC and JLJ performed and interpreted the results of flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis. LVP, LJM, and RJF drafted the manuscript, which was read, edited, and approved by all authors.