The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-151) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
EOO and DGA jointly originated the methodology and concept. EOO performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript including figures and tables. All authors contributed to revisions of the manuscript, and read and approved the final version.
Fetal ultrasound scanning is considered vital for routine antenatal care with first trimester scans recommended for accurate estimation of gestational age (GA). A reliable estimate of gestational age is key information underpinning clinical care and allows estimation of expected date of delivery. Fetal crown-rump length (CRL) is recommended over last menstrual period for estimating GA when measured in early pregnancy i.e. 9+0-13+6 weeks.
The INTERGROWTH-21st Project is the largest prospective study to collect data on CRL in geographically diverse populations and with a high level of quality control measures in place. We aim to develop a new gestational age estimation equation based on the crown-rump length (CRL) from women recruited between 9+0-13+6 weeks. The main statistical challenge is modelling data when the outcome variable (GA) is truncated at both ends, i.e. at 9 and 14 weeks.
We explored three alternative statistical approaches to overcome the truncation of GA. To evaluate these strategies we generated a data set with no truncation of GA that was similar to the INTERGROWTH-21st Project CRL data, which we used to explore the performance of different methods of analysis of these data when we imposed truncation at 9 and 14 weeks of gestation. These 3 methods were first tested in a simulation based study using a previously published dating equation by Verburg et al. and evaluated how well each of them performed in relation to the model from which the data were generated. After evaluating the 3 approaches using simulated data based on the Verburg equations, the best approach will be applied to the INTERGROWTH-21st Project data to estimate GA from CRL.
Results of these rather “ad hoc” statistical methods correspond very closely to the “real data” for Verburg, a data set that is similar to the INTERGROWTH-21st project CRL data set.
We are confident that we can use these approaches to get reliable estimates based on INTERGROWTH-21st Project CRL data. These approaches may be a solution to other truncation problems involving similar data though their application to other settings would need to be evaluated.
Authors’ original file for figure 112874_2013_1023_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 212874_2013_1023_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 312874_2013_1023_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 412874_2013_1023_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 512874_2013_1023_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 612874_2013_1023_MOESM6_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 712874_2013_1023_MOESM7_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 812874_2013_1023_MOESM8_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 912874_2013_1023_MOESM9_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 1012874_2013_1023_MOESM10_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 1112874_2013_1023_MOESM11_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 1212874_2013_1023_MOESM12_ESM.pdf
ISUOG: Practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 41 (1): 102-113. CrossRef
Verburg BO, Steegers EAP, De Ridder M, Snijders RJM, Smith E, Hofman A, Moll HA, Jaddoe VWV, Witteman JCM: New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 31 (4): 388-396. 10.1002/uog.5225. CrossRefPubMed
Treloar A, Behn BG, Cowan DW: Analysis of gestational interval. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967, 99: 34-45. PubMed
Campbell S: The prediction of fetal maturity by ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter. BJOG. 1969, 76 (7): 603-609. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1969.tb06146.x. CrossRef
Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ: Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985, 65 (5): 613-620. PubMed
Waldenström U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S: A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1990, 76 (3 Pt 1): 336-338. PubMed
Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; Royal College of Physicians of Ireland; Directorate of Quality and Clinical Care: HSE: Ultrasound diagnosis of early pregnancy miscarriage. Clin Pract Guidel. 2010, 4-7. Version 1. Guideline 1
Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M: A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007, 21: 62-71. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x. CrossRefPubMed
Napolitano R, Dhami J, Ohuma E, Loannou C, Conde Agudelo A, Kennedy S, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT: Systematic review of the methodology used for creating dating charts based on fetal crown-rump length. BJOG. 2013, Accepted
Sladkevicius P, Saltvedt S, Almström H, Kublickas M, Grunewald C, Valentin L: Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 26 (5): 504-511. 10.1002/uog.1993. CrossRefPubMed
Robinson HP, Fleming JEE: A critical evaluation of sonar crown-rump length measurements. BJOG. 1975, 82 (9): 702-710. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x. CrossRef
Multicentre Growth Reference Study WHO: Assessment of differences in linear growth among populations in the WHO multicentre growth reference study. Acta Paediatr. 2006, 450: 56-65.
Altman DG, Chitty LS: Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. BJOG. 1994, 101 (1): 29-34. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13006.x. CrossRef
Royston P, Altman DG: Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. J R Stat Soc: Ser C: Appl Stat. 1994, 43 (3): 429-467.
Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Washington AE: First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 198 (6): e701-e703. e706 CrossRef
MacGregor SN, Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Minogue JP, Gibson ME, Hoffman DI: Underestimation of gestational age by conventional crown-rump length dating curves. Obstet Gynecol. 1987, 70 (3 Pt 1): 344-348. PubMed
No Author: Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. BMJ. 1980, 281 (6238): 470-
Falco P, Milano V, Pilu G, David C, Grisolia G, Rizzo N, Bovicelli L: Sonography of pregnancies with first-trimester bleeding and a viable embryo: a study of prognostic indicators by logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 7 (3): 165-169. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030165.x. CrossRefPubMed
Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V: Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 97 (2): 189-194. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01131-5. PubMed
- Estimation of gestational age in early pregnancy from crown-rump length when gestational age range is truncated: the case study of the INTERGROWTH-21stProject
Eric O Ohuma
Aris T Papageorghiou
Douglas G Altman
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II