nach oben

Erschienen in:

19.07.2021 | Review Article

Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate: a review of their roles in forensic toxicology analysis of alcohol postmortem

verfasst von: Salma N. Alsayed, Asia G. Alharbi, Asrar S. Alhejaili, Reham J. Aljukhlub, Danih H. Al-Amoudi, Asma I. Ashankyty, Mansour A. Alzahrani, Torki A. Zughaibi, Omar A. Alharbi, Ali M. Kheyami, Nawal M. Helmi, Mansour A. Tobaiqy, Almonther A. Hershan, David G. Watson, Ahmed I. Al-Asmari

Erschienen in: Forensic Toxicology | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This review presents the current methods used for determining ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) concentrations in postmortem specimens, including sample preparation, analysis and the role of EtG and EtS in the postmortem assessment of the extent of alcohol abuse.

Methods

Papers pertaining to postmortem investigation were collected from scientific databases and reviewed. The papers were published between January 2006 and October 2020.

Results

Most of the analyses involved postmortem blood and urine samples, with a few reports using other bodily specimens and tissues. The method validation was not conducted for all applications. These reports were mostly intended to present data rather than interpret them, and the lack of effort in relating these ethanol biomarkers with the cause of death and/or determination of the time of deaths due to ethanol intoxication might decrease the applicability of these makers after a promising start between 2006 and 2010. Nevertheless, by the beginning of 2020, papers investigating ethanol biomarkers were still increasing. A considerable number of methods used liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) techniques that require less sample preparation (e.g., protein precipitation extraction, dilution, filtration, and centrifugation). Although solid-phase extraction can be applied, only three applications were reported.

Conclusions

Matrix effects can be a substantial challenge in analytical methods based on LC–MS because they directly affect the ionization of analytes. However, these problems can be avoided due to the high cutoff values used to identify positive results for these ethanol biomarkers, which are often above 0.1–1 mg/L, and using internal standards. Research on using tissue specimens is recommended as most of the reported results on this type of specimen were promising.

Al-Asmari AI, Al-Amoudi DH (2020) The role of ethanol in fatalities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Forensic Sci Int 316:110464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110464CrossRefPubMed

Santunione AL, Verri P, Marchesi F, Rustichelli C, Palazzoli F, Vandelli D, Licata M, Silingardi E (2018) The role of ethyl glucuronide in supporting medico-legal investigations: analysis of this biomarker in different postmortem specimens from 21 selected autopsy cases. J Forensic Leg Med 53:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.10.009CrossRefPubMed

Krabseth H, Morland J, Hoiseth G (2014) Assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in the interpretation of postmortem ethanol findings. Int J Legal Med 128(5):765–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1031-zCrossRefPubMed

Levine B, Smith ML, Smialek JE, Caplan YH (1993) Interpretation of low postmortem concentrations of ethanol. J Forensic Sci 38(3):663–6675CrossRef

De Lima IV, Midio AF (1999) Origin of blood ethanol in decomposed bodies. Forensic Sci Int 106(3):157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00150-4CrossRefPubMed

Athanaselis S, Stefanidou M, Koutselinis A (2005) Interpretation of postmortem alcohol concentrations. Forensic Sci Int 149(2–3):289–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.04.001CrossRefPubMed

Ziavrou K, Boumba VA, Vougiouklakis TG (2005) Insights into the origin of postmortem ethanol. Int J Toxicol 24(2):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10915810590936391CrossRefPubMed

O’Neal CL, Poklis A (1996) Postmortem production of ethanol and factors that influence interpretation: a critical review. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 17(1):8–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199603000-00002CrossRefPubMed

Saady JJ, Poklis A, Dalton HP (1993) Production of urinary ethanol after sample collection. J Forensic Sci 38(6):1467–1471CrossRef

10.

Lewis RJ, Johnson RD, Angier MK, Vu NT (2004) Ethanol formation in unadulterated postmortem tissues. Forensic Sci Int 146(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.03.015CrossRefPubMed

11.

Al-Asmari AI, Anderson RA, Appelblad P (2010) Direct determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem urine specimens using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 34(5):261–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/34.5.261CrossRefPubMed

12.

Krabseth H, Mørland J, Høiseth G (2014) Assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in the interpretation of postmortem ethanol findings. Int J Legal Med 128(5):765–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1031-zCrossRefPubMed

13.

Cowan DM, Maskrey JR, Fung ES, Woods TA, Stabryla LM, Scott PK, Finley BL (2016) Best-practices approach to determination of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at specific time points: Combination of ante-mortem alcohol pharmacokinetic modeling and post-mortem alcohol generation and transport considerations. Regul Toxicol pharmacol 78:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.03.020CrossRefPubMed

14.

Tagliaro F, Lubli G, Ghielmi S, Franchi D, Marigo M (1992) Chromatographic methods for blood alcohol determination. J Chromatogr 580(1–2):161–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(92)80534-wCrossRefPubMed

15.

Musshof F (2002) Chromatographic methods for the determination of markers of chronic and acute alcohol consumption. Journal chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 781(1–2):457–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00691-8CrossRef

16.

Hoiseth G, Karinen R, Johnsen L, Normann PT, Christophersen AS, Morland J (2008) Disappearance of ethyl glucuronide during heavy putrefaction. Forensic Sci Int 176(2–3):147–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.08.002CrossRefPubMed

17.

Politi L, Morini L, Mari F, Groppi A, Bertol E (2008) Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in autopsy samples 27 years after death. Int J Legal Med 122(6):507–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0273-zCrossRefPubMed

18.

Schmitt G, Aderjan R, Keller T, Wu M (1995) Ethyl glucuronide: an unusual ethanol metabolite in humans. Synthesis, analytical data, and determination in serum and urine. J Anal Toxicol 19(2):91–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/19.2.91CrossRefPubMed

19.

Palmer RB (2009) A review of the use of ethyl glucuronide as a marker for ethanol consumption in forensic and clinical medicine. Semin Diagn Pathol 26(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2008.12.005CrossRefPubMed

20.

Biondi A, Freni F, Carelli C, Moretti M, Morini L (2019) Ethyl glucuronide hair testing: a review. Forensic Sci Int 300:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.004CrossRefPubMed

21.

Jatlow P, O’Malley SS (2010) Clinical (nonforensic) application of ethyl glucuronide measurement: are we ready? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34(6):968–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01171.xxCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Kummer N, Lambert WE, Samyn N, Stove CP (2016) Alternative sampling strategies for the assessment of alcohol intake of living persons. Clin Bioch 49(13–14):1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.05.007CrossRef

23.

Lin Z, Wang H, Jones AW, Wang F, Zhang Y, Rao Y (2020) Evaluation and review of ways to differentiate sources of ethanol in postmortem blood. Int J Legal Med 134(6):2081–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02415-9CrossRefPubMed

24.

Rosman AS (1992) Utility and evaluation of biochemical markers of alcohol consumption. J Subst Abuse 4(3):277–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-3289(92)90036-wCrossRefPubMed

25.

Sharpe PC (2001) Biochemical detection and monitoring of alcohol abuse and abstinence. Ann Clin Biochem 38(Pt 6):652–664. https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563011901064CrossRefPubMed

26.

Helander A, Beck O (2007) Chapter 17 Analytical markers of acute and chronic alcohol consumption. In: Bogusz M (ed) Handbook of analytical separations, vol 6. Elsevier Science B.V, pp 567–588

27.

Jones AW (2006) Alcohol. In: Karch SB (ed) Drug abuse handbook, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., London, pp 313–427

28.

Andresen-Streichert H, Müller A, Glahn A, Skopp G, Sterneck M (2018) Alcohol biomarkers in clinical and forensic contexts. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115(18):309–315. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Vezzoli S, Bernini M, De Ferrari F (2015) Ethyl glucuronide in vitreous humor and blood postmortem specimens: analysis by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry and interpreting results of neo-formation of ethanol. Ann Ist Super Sanita 51(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.4415/ann_15_01_05CrossRefPubMed

30.

Pronko PS, Velichko MG, Moroz AR, Rubanovich NN (1997) Low-molecular-weight metabolites relevant to ethanol metabolism: correlation with alcohol withdrawal severity and utility for identification of alcoholics. Alcohol Alcohol 32(6):761–768. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008327CrossRefPubMed

31.

Karch S (2007) Forensic Issues in Alcohol Testing. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef

32.

Jones AW (2006) Urine as a biological specimen for forensic analysis of alcohol and variability in the urine-to-blood relationship. Toxicol Rev 25(1):15–35. https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200625010-00002CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kugelberg FC, Jones AW (2007) Interpreting results of ethanol analysis in postmortem specimens: a review of the literature. Forensic Sci Int1 65(1):10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.004CrossRef

34.

Ismaiel OA, Jenkins RG, Karnes HT (2013) Investigation of endogenous blood lipids components that contribute to matrix effects in dried blood spot samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 5(8):710–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.142CrossRefPubMed

35.

Hegstad S, Kristoffersen L, Liane VH, Spigset O (2017) EtG and EtS in autopsy blood samples with and without putrefaction using UPLC-MS-MS. J Anal Toxicol 41(2):107–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkw123CrossRefPubMed

36.

Ferreiro-Vera C, Priego-Capote F, Luque de Castro MD (2012) Comparison of sample preparation approaches for phospholipids profiling in human serum by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatr A 1240:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.03.074CrossRef

37.

Peters FT, Remane D (2012) Aspects of matrix effects in applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to forensic and clinical toxicology-a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 403(8):2155–2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6035-2CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bylda C, Thiele R, Kobold U, Volmer DA (2014) Recent advances in sample preparation techniques to overcome difficulties encountered during quantitative analysis of small molecules from biofluids using LC-MS/MS. Analyst 139(10):2265–2276. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4an00094cCrossRefPubMed

39.

Chambers E, Wagrowski-Diehl DM, Lu Z, Mazzeo JR (2007) Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 852(1–2):22–34CrossRef

40.

Sidgey D, Liane V, Kristoffersen L (2020) Quantitative determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem and antemortem whole blood using phospholipid removal 96-well plate and UHPLC-MS-MS. J Anal Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa108CrossRef

41.

Zhang XY, Lin ZB, Li JL, Huang ZB, Rao YL, Liang H, Yan J, Zheng F (2017) Rapid determination of nine barbiturates in human whole blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 9(4):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2002/CrossRefPubMed

42.

Skopp G (2004) Preanalytic aspects in postmortem toxicology. Forensic Sci Int 142(2–3):75–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.02.012CrossRefPubMed

43.

Al-Asmari AI (2009) Applications of LC-MS/MS in Forensic Toxicology for the Analysis of Drugs and Their Metabolites. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland

44.

Zhang X, Zheng F, Lin Z, Johansen SS, Yu T, Liu Y, Huang Z, Li J, Yan J, Rao Y (2017) Simultaneous determination of ethanol’s four types of non-oxidative metabolites in human whole blood by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 963:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.01.040CrossRefPubMed

45.

Kwon M, Choi HJ, Jo YH, Son MH, Min JS, Kim NY, Jung JE (2019) Analysis of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in blood to determine the absorption or elimination phase of alcohol for Korean. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.06.015CrossRefPubMed

46.

Rainio J, Kultti J, Kangastupa P, Tuomi H, Ahola S, Karhunen PJ, Helander A, Niemelä O (2013) Immunoassay for ethyl glucuronide in vitreous humor: a new tool for postmortem diagnostics of alcohol use. Forensic Sci Int 226(1–3):261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.040CrossRefPubMed

47.

Wang H, Li B, Wang F, Chang J, Zhang Y, Rao Y (2020) Determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in human whole blood and vitreous humor by LC-MS/MS and applications to the interpretation of postmortem ethanol findings. J Anal Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkz082CrossRefPubMed

48.

Schloegl H, Rost T, Schmidt W, Wurst FM, Weinmann W (2006) Distribution of ethyl glucuronide in rib bone marrow, other tissues and body liquids as proof of alcohol consumption before death. Forensic Sci Int 156(2–3):213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.024CrossRefPubMed

49.

Kharbouche H, Sporkert F, Troxler S, Augsburger M, Mangin P, Staub C (2009) Development and validation of a gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of ethyl glucuronide in hair and its application to forensic toxicology. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 877(23):2337–2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.11.046CrossRefPubMed

50.

SOFT/AAFS (2006) Forensic toxicology laboratory guideline. http://www.soft-tox.org/files/Guidelines_2006_Final.pdf Accessed 17 Nov 2020

51.

Hoiseth G, Karinen R, Christophersen AS, Olsen L, Normann PT, Morland J (2007) A study of ethyl glucuronide in post-mortem blood as a marker of ante-mortem ingestion of alcohol. Forensic Sci Int 165(1):41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.045CrossRefPubMed

52.

Weinmann W, Schaefer P, Thierauf A, Schreiber A, Wurst FM (2004) Confirmatory analysis of ethylglucuronide in urine by liquid-chromatography/electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry according to forensic guidelines. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 15(2):188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2003.10.010CrossRefPubMed

53.

Keten A, Tumer AR, Balseven-Odabasi A (2009) Measurement of ethyl glucuronide in vitreous humor with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Forensic Sci Int 193(1–3):101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.018CrossRefPubMed

54.

Thierauf A, Kempf J, Perdekamp MG, Auwarter V, Gnann H, Wohlfarth A, Weinmann W (2011) Ethyl sulphate and ethyl glucuronide in vitreous humor as postmortem evidence marker for ethanol consumption prior to death. Forensic Sci Int 210(1–3):63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.036CrossRefPubMed

55.

Høiseth G, Morini L, Polettini A, Christophersen A, Mørland J (2009) Blood kinetics of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate in heavy drinkers during alcohol detoxification. Forensic Sci Int 188(1–3):52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.017CrossRefPubMed

56.

Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology (2013). J Anal Toxicol 37(7):452–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkt054

57.

Beyer J, Gerostamoulos D, Drummer O, Costantino A (2007) Comments on "The effect of the use of mouthwash on ethylglucuronide concentration in urine". J Anal Toxicol 31(5):294–295; author reply 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/31.5.294

58.

Wang H, Li JL, Huang ZB, Wang FL, Zhang YF, Chang J, Rao YL (2019) Assessment of the role played by n-propanol in distinction of ethanol source in postmortem blood with the assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate. Forensic Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-019-00507-9CrossRef

59.

Hoiseth G, Karinen R, Christophersen A, Morland J (2010) Practical use of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem cases as markers of antemortem alcohol ingestion. Int J Legal Med 124(2):143–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0393-0CrossRefPubMed

60.

Liu YM, Zhang XY, Li JL, Huang ZB, Lin ZB, Wang JR, Zhang CQ, Rao YL (2018) Stability of ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulfate, phosphatidylethanols and fatty acid ethyl esters in postmortem human blood. J Anal Toxicol 42(5):346–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bky010CrossRefPubMed

61.

Saenz SR, Lewis RJ, Angier MK, Wagner JR (2017) Postmortem fluid and tissue concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC and THC-COOH. J Anal Toxicol 41(6):508–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx033CrossRefPubMed

62.

Esteve-Turrillas FA, Bicker W, Lammerhofer M, Keller T, Lindner W (2006) Determination of ethyl sulfate–a marker for recent ethanol consumption–in human urine by CE with indirect UV detection. Electrophoresis 27(23):4763–4771. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200600155CrossRefPubMed

63.

Bicker W, Lammerhofer M, Keller T, Schuhmacher R, Krska R, Lindner W (2006) Validated method for the determination of the ethanol consumption markers ethyl glucuronide, ethyl phosphate, and ethyl sulfate in human urine by reversed-phase/weak anion exchange liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 78(16):5884–5892. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac060680+CrossRefPubMed

64.

Blackmore DJ (1968) The bacterial production of ethyl alcohol. J Forensic Sci Soc 8(2):73–78CrossRef

65.

Harper DR (1989) A comparative study of the microbiological contamination of postmortem blood and vitreous humour samples taken for ethanol determination. Forensic Sci Int 43(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(89)90120-5CrossRefPubMed

66.

Hoiseth G, Bernard JP, Karinen R, Johnsen L, Helander A, Christophersen AS, Morland J (2007) A pharmacokinetic study of ethyl glucuronide in blood and urine: applications to forensic toxicology. Forensic Sci Int 172(2–3):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.005CrossRefPubMed

67.

Bendroth P, Kronstrand R, Helander A, Greby J, Stephanson N, Krantz P (2008) Comparison of ethyl glucuronide in hair with phosphatidylethanol in whole blood as post-mortem markers of alcohol abuse. Forensic Sci Int 176(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.012CrossRefPubMed

68.

Morini L, Politi L, Zucchella A, Polettini A (2007) Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate determination in serum by liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 376(1):213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2006.08.024CrossRefPubMed

69.

Kintz P (2015) 2014 consensus for the use of alcohol markers in hair for assessment of both abstinence and chronic excessive alcohol consumption. Forensic Sci Int 249:A1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.11.001CrossRefPubMed

70.

Kintz P (2010) Consensus of the Society of Hair Testing on hair testing for chronic excessive alcohol consumption 2009. Forensic Sci Int 249:A1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.11.001CrossRef

71.

Kaushik R, Levine B, LaCourse WR (2006) A brief review: HPLC methods to directly detect drug glucuronides in biological matrices (Part I). Anal Chim Acta 556(2):255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.09.012CrossRef

72.

Dahl H, Stephanson N, Beck O, Helander A (2002) Comparison of urinary excretion characteristics of ethanol and ethyl glucuronide. J Anal Toxicol 26(4):201–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/26.4.201CrossRefPubMed

73.

Salvador JP, Adrian J, Galve R, Pinacho DG, Kreuzer M, Sánchez-Baeza F, Marco MP (2007) Chapter 28 Application of bioassays/biosensors for the analysis of pharmaceuticals in environmental samples. In: Petrović M, Barceló D (eds) Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol 50. Elsevier, pp 279–334

74.

Böttcher M, Kühne D, Beck O (2018) Sevoflurane metabolite cross-react in the ethyl glucuronide DRI® immunoassay. Drug Test Anal 10(2):379–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2233CrossRefPubMed

75.

Cuypers E, Flanagan RJ (2018) The interpretation of hair analysis for drugs and drug metabolites. Clin Toxicol 56(2):90–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2017.1379603CrossRef

76.

Helander A, Kenan N, Beck O (2010) Comparison of analytical approaches for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry determination of the alcohol biomarker ethyl glucuronide in urine. Rapid commun in Mass Spectrom 24(12):1737–1743. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4573CrossRef

77.

Ferrari LA, Triszcz JM, Giannuzzi L (2006) Kinetics of ethanol degradation in forensic blood samples. Forensic Sci Int 161(2–3):144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.049CrossRefPubMed

78.

Thierauf A, Serr A, Halter CC, Al-Ahmad A, Rana S, Weinmann W (2008) Influence of preservatives on the stability of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate in urine. Forensic Sci Int 182(1–3):41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.09.011CrossRefPubMed

79.

Weiler GaK A (1996) Alcohol evaporation from blood stored in unstoppered tube. ToxTalk 20(2):7

80.

Jones AW, Ericsson E (2016) Decreases in blood ethanol concentrations during storage at 4 °C for 12 months were the same for specimens kept in glass or plastic tubes. Pract Lab Med 4:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2016.02.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Corry JE (1978) A review. Possible sources of ethanol ante- and post-mortem: its relationship to the biochemistry and microbiology of decomposition. J Appl Bacteriol 44(1):1–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1978.tb00776.xCrossRefPubMed

82.

Takayasu T, Ohshima T, Tanaka N, Maeda H, Kondo T, Nishigami J, Nagano T (1995) Postmortem degradation of administered ethanol-d6 and production of endogenous ethanol: experimental studies using rats and rabbits. Forensic Sci Int 76(2):129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(95)01807-7CrossRefPubMed

83.

Amick GD, Habben KH (1997) Inhibition of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in human blood by sodium fluoride. J Forensic Sci 42(4):690–692CrossRef

84.

Hoiseth G, Kristoffersen L, Larssen B, Arnestad M, Hermansen NO, Morland J (2008) In vitro formation of ethanol in autopsy samples containing fluoride ions. Int J Legal Med 122(1):63–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0166-6CrossRefPubMed

85.

Schloegl H, Dresen S, Spaczynski K, Stoertzel M, Wurst FM, Weinmann W (2006) Stability of ethyl glucuronide in urine, post-mortem tissue and blood samples. Int J Legal Med 120(2):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-005-0012-7CrossRefPubMed

86.

Gill JR (2017) From death to death certificate: what do the dead say? J Med Toxicol 13(1):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-016-0551-yCrossRefPubMed

87.

Quintas MJ, Costa P, Melo P, Castro A, Franco JM, Teixeira HM (2017) Postmortem in vitro ethanol production-It could be more common than we think! Forensic Sci Int 274:113–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.040CrossRefPubMed

88.

Laurens JB, Sewell FJJ, Kock MM (2018) Pre-analytical factors related to the stability of ethanol concentration during storage of ante-mortem blood alcohol specimens. J Forensic Leg Med 58:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.06.003CrossRefPubMed

89.

Ferraguti G, Ciolli P, Carito V, Battagliese G, Mancinelli R, Ciafrè S, Tirassa P, Ciccarelli R, Cipriani A, Messina MP, Fiore M, Ceccanti M (2017) Ethylglucuronide in the urine as a marker of alcohol consumption during pregnancy: comparison with four alcohol screening questionnaires. Toxicol lett 275:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.04.016CrossRefPubMed

90.

Casati S, Ravelli A, Angeli I, Durello R, Minoli M, Orioli M (2019) An automated sample preparation approach for routine liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry measurement of the alcohol biomarkers phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1, 16:0/16:0 and 18:1/18:1. J Chromatogr A 1589:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.12.048CrossRefPubMed

91.

Baranowski S, Serr A, Thierauf A, Weinmann W, Grobetae Perdekamp M, Wurst FM, Halter CC (2008) In vitro study of bacterial degradation of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate. Int J Legal Med 122(5):389–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0229-3CrossRefPubMed

92.

Lundberg R (2018) Ethanol, ethyl glucuronide, and ethyl sulfate kinetics after multiple ethanol intakes: a study of ethanol consumption to better determine the latest intake of alcohol in hip flask defence cases. Student thesis

93.

Nguyen VL, Paull P, Haber PS, Chitty K, Seth D (2018) Evaluation of a novel method for the analysis of alcohol biomarkers: ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulfate and phosphatidylethanol. Alcohol 67:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.08.009CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate: a review of their roles in forensic toxicology analysis of alcohol postmortem
verfasst von: Salma N. Alsayed
Asia G. Alharbi
Asrar S. Alhejaili
Reham J. Aljukhlub
Danih H. Al-Amoudi
Asma I. Ashankyty
Mansour A. Alzahrani
Torki A. Zughaibi
Omar A. Alharbi
Ali M. Kheyami
Nawal M. Helmi
Mansour A. Tobaiqy
Almonther A. Hershan
David G. Watson
Ahmed I. Al-Asmari
Publikationsdatum: 19.07.2021
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: Forensic Toxicology / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1860-8965
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-8973
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-021-00588-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

01.04.2024 | Forensische Traumatologie | CME

Springer Medizin

Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate: a review of their roles in forensic toxicology analysis of alcohol postmortem

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Theoretische Grundlagen von Explosionen und Explosionsverletzungen

Auswirkungen vorgeschalteter Laborprozesse auf die Digitalisierung histologischer Schnittpräparate

Knochenmarkhistologie bei Zytopenien

Herausforderungen der Automation bei der quantitativen Auswertung von Leberbiopsien

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

A fatal case involved in pyrethroid insecticide ingestion: quantification of tetramethrin and resmethrin in body fluids of a deceased by LC–MS/MS

Neurotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in the animal brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Agonistic activity of fentanyl analogs and their metabolites on opioid receptors

Identification and characterization of novel synthetic cannabinoid ethyl-2-(1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxamido)-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (5F-EDMB-PICA)

Determination of new psychoactive substances and other drugs in postmortem blood and urine by UHPLC–MS/MS: method validation and analysis of forensic samples

Ropinirole involved in a fatal case: blood and urinary concentrations

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Theoretische Grundlagen von Explosionen und Explosionsverletzungen

Auswirkungen vorgeschalteter Laborprozesse auf die Digitalisierung histologischer Schnittpräparate

Knochenmarkhistologie bei Zytopenien

Herausforderungen der Automation bei der quantitativen Auswertung von Leberbiopsien