Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2020

11.02.2020 | Review Article

EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Mahendran Jayaraj, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Dhruv Singh, Joanna Law, Michael Larsen, Andrew Ross, Richard Kozarek, Shayan Irani

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In patients with acute cholecystitis who are deemed high risk for cholecystectomy, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) was historically performed for gallbladder drainage (GBD). There are several limitations associated with PC. Endoscopic GBD [Endoscopic transpapillary GBD (ET-GBD) and EUS-guided GBD (EUS-GBD)] is an alternative to PC. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of EUS-GBD versus ET-GBD.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of multiple databases through May 2019 to identify studies that compared outcomes of EUS-GBD versus ET-GBD in the management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Pooled odds ratios (OR) of technical success, clinical success and adverse events between EUS-GBD and ET-GBD groups were calculated.

Results

Five studies with a total of 857 patients (EUS-GBD vs ET-GBD: 259 vs 598 patients) were included in the analysis. EUS-GBD was associated with higher technical [pooled OR 5.22 (95% CI 2.03–13.44; p = 0.0006; I2 = 20%)] and clinical success [pooled OR 4.16 (95% CI 2.00–8.66; p = 0.0001; I2 = 19%)] compared to ET-GBD. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of overall adverse events [pooled OR 1.30 (95% CI 0.77–2.22; p = 0.33, I2 = 0%)]. EUS-GBD was associated with lower rate of recurrent cholecystitis [pooled OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.14–0.79; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%)]. There was low heterogeneity in the analyses.

Conclusion

EUS-GBD has higher rate of technical and clinical success compared to ET-GBD. While the rates of overall adverse events are statistically similar, EUS-GBD has lower rate of recurrent cholecystitis. Hence, EUS-GBD is preferable to ET-GBD for endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis in select high-risk surgical patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dana O, Brian B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE (2005) Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg 71(4):298–302 Dana O, Brian B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE (2005) Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg 71(4):298–302
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Spira RM, Nissan A, Zamir O, Cohen T, Fields SI, Freund HR (2002) Percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in critically ill patients with acute calculus cholecystitis. Am J Surg 183(1):62–66CrossRef Spira RM, Nissan A, Zamir O, Cohen T, Fields SI, Freund HR (2002) Percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in critically ill patients with acute calculus cholecystitis. Am J Surg 183(1):62–66CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J (2012) Short-and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 26(5):1343–1351CrossRef McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J (2012) Short-and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 26(5):1343–1351CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, Pappas TN, Stiffler HL, Jowell PS et al (2003) Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg 197(2):206–211CrossRef Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, Pappas TN, Stiffler HL, Jowell PS et al (2003) Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg 197(2):206–211CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoi T, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH (2010) Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 71(6):1038–1045CrossRef Itoi T, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH (2010) Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 71(6):1038–1045CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Irani S, Baron TH, Grimm IS, Khashab MA (2015) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 82(6):1110–1115CrossRef Irani S, Baron TH, Grimm IS, Khashab MA (2015) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 82(6):1110–1115CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozarek RA (1984) Selective cannulation of the cystic duct at time of ERCP. J Clin Gastroenterol 6(1):37–40PubMed Kozarek RA (1984) Selective cannulation of the cystic duct at time of ERCP. J Clin Gastroenterol 6(1):37–40PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee TH, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Park SH, Lee SK et al (2011) Outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting for symptomatic gallbladder diseases: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Endoscopy 43(08):702–708CrossRef Lee TH, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Park SH, Lee SK et al (2011) Outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting for symptomatic gallbladder diseases: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Endoscopy 43(08):702–708CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron TH, Topazian MD (2007) Endoscopic transduodenal drainage of the gallbladder: implications for endoluminal treatment of gallbladder disease. Gastrointest Endosc 65(4):735–737CrossRef Baron TH, Topazian MD (2007) Endoscopic transduodenal drainage of the gallbladder: implications for endoluminal treatment of gallbladder disease. Gastrointest Endosc 65(4):735–737CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan MA, Atiq O, Kubiliun N, Ali B, Kamal F, Nollan R et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: is it better than percutaneous gallbladder drainage? Gastrointest Endosc 85(1):76–87CrossRef Khan MA, Atiq O, Kubiliun N, Ali B, Kamal F, Nollan R et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: is it better than percutaneous gallbladder drainage? Gastrointest Endosc 85(1):76–87CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Peñas-Herrero I, de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for the management of acute cholecystitis (with video). J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 22(1):35–43CrossRef Peñas-Herrero I, de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for the management of acute cholecystitis (with video). J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 22(1):35–43CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderloni A, Di Leo M, Carrara S, Fugazza A, Maselli R, Buda A et al (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage by cautery-tipped lumen-apposing metal stent: exploring the possible indications. Ann Gastroenterol 31(6):735PubMedPubMedCentral Anderloni A, Di Leo M, Carrara S, Fugazza A, Maselli R, Buda A et al (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage by cautery-tipped lumen-apposing metal stent: exploring the possible indications. Ann Gastroenterol 31(6):735PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Seerden TC, Vleggaar FP (2016) Endoscopic removal of buried lumen-apposing metal stents used for cystogastrostomy and cholecystogastrostomy. Endoscopy 48(S 01):E179CrossRef Seerden TC, Vleggaar FP (2016) Endoscopic removal of buried lumen-apposing metal stents used for cystogastrostomy and cholecystogastrostomy. Endoscopy 48(S 01):E179CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron TH, Grimm IS, Swanstrom LL (2015) Interventional approaches to gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med 373(4):357–365CrossRef Baron TH, Grimm IS, Swanstrom LL (2015) Interventional approaches to gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med 373(4):357–365CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh D, Song TJ, Cho DH, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK et al (2019) EUS-guided cholecystostomy versus endoscopic transpapillary cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Gastrointest Endosc 89(2):289–298CrossRef Oh D, Song TJ, Cho DH, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK et al (2019) EUS-guided cholecystostomy versus endoscopic transpapillary cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Gastrointest Endosc 89(2):289–298CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui A, Kunda R, Tyberg A, Arain MA, Noor A, Mumtaz T et al (2018) Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 33(4):1–11 Siddiqui A, Kunda R, Tyberg A, Arain MA, Noor A, Mumtaz T et al (2018) Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 33(4):1–11
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Teeratorn N, Ridtitid W, Piyachaturawat P, Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R (2019) 1029 Outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: transpapillary approach versus endoscopic ultrasoud-guided transmural approach. Gastrointest Endosc 89(6):AB132-AB133. Teeratorn N, Ridtitid W, Piyachaturawat P, Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R (2019) 1029 Outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: transpapillary approach versus endoscopic ultrasoud-guided transmural approach. Gastrointest Endosc 89(6):AB132-AB133.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsubara S, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Ishigaki K, Umefune G, Watanabe T et al. (2016) Su1289 endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage is superior to endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 83(5):AB339. Matsubara S, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Ishigaki K, Umefune G, Watanabe T et al. (2016) Su1289 endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage is superior to endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 83(5):AB339.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Gree Higgins JP, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Hoboken Higgins JP, Gree Higgins JP, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Hoboken
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188CrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1294–1302CrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1294–1302CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori Y, Itoi T, Baron TH, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):87–95CrossRef Mori Y, Itoi T, Baron TH, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):87–95CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JHY, Teoh AYB (2018) Current status of endoscopic gallbladder drainage. Clin Endosc 51(2):150CrossRef Chan JHY, Teoh AYB (2018) Current status of endoscopic gallbladder drainage. Clin Endosc 51(2):150CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Higa JT, Irani SS (2019) Endoscopic methods for gallbladder drainage. Curr Treat Opt Gastroenterol 17(3):357–366CrossRef Higa JT, Irani SS (2019) Endoscopic methods for gallbladder drainage. Curr Treat Opt Gastroenterol 17(3):357–366CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoi T, Takada T, Hwang TL, Endo I, Akazawa K, Miura F et al (2017) Percutaneous and endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: international multicenter comparative study using propensity score-matched analysis. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 24(6):362–368CrossRef Itoi T, Takada T, Hwang TL, Endo I, Akazawa K, Miura F et al (2017) Percutaneous and endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: international multicenter comparative study using propensity score-matched analysis. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 24(6):362–368CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Iino C, Shimoyama T, Igarashi T, Aihara T, Ishii K, Sakamoto J et al (2018) Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis. Endosc Int Open 6(05):E594–E601CrossRef Iino C, Shimoyama T, Igarashi T, Aihara T, Ishii K, Sakamoto J et al (2018) Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis. Endosc Int Open 6(05):E594–E601CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue T, Okumura F, Kachi K, Fukusada S, Iwasaki H, Ozeki T et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 83(5):905–913CrossRef Inoue T, Okumura F, Kachi K, Fukusada S, Iwasaki H, Ozeki T et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 83(5):905–913CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Luk SWY, Irani S, Krishnamoorthi R, Lau JYW, Ng EKW, Teoh AYB (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 51(8):722–732CrossRef Luk SWY, Irani S, Krishnamoorthi R, Lau JYW, Ng EKW, Teoh AYB (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 51(8):722–732CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
Mahendran Jayaraj
Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar
Dhruv Singh
Joanna Law
Michael Larsen
Andrew Ross
Richard Kozarek
Shayan Irani
Publikationsdatum
11.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07409-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.