Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2018

09.02.2018 | Original Research

Evaluating the Quality of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Post-Acute Care

verfasst von: Robert E. Burke, MD, MS, Jacqueline Jones, RN, PhD, FAAN, Emily Lawrence, MPH, Amy Ladebue, BA, Roman Ayele, MPH, Chelsea Leonard, PhD, Brandi Lippmann, MA, Daniel D. Matlock, MD, MPH, Rebecca Allyn, MD, Ethan Cumbler, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Despite a national focus on post-acute care brought about by recent payment reforms, relatively little is known about how hospitalized older adults and their caregivers decide whether to go to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after hospitalization.

Objective

We sought to understand to what extent hospitalized older adults and their caregivers are empowered to make a high-quality decision about utilizing an SNF for post-acute care and what contextual or process elements led to satisfaction with the outcome of their decision once in SNF.

Design

Qualitative inquiry using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), a conceptual framework that describes key components of high-quality decision-making.

Participants

Thirty-two previously community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years old) and 22 caregivers interviewed at three different hospitals and three skilled nursing facilities.

Main Measures

We used key components of the ODSF to identify elements of context and process that affected decision-making and to what extent the outcome was characteristic of a high-quality decision: informed, values based, and not associated with regret or blame.

Key Results

The most important contextual themes were the presence of active medical conditions in the hospital that made decision-making difficult, prior experiences with hospital readmission or SNF, relative level of caregiver support, and pressure to make a decision quickly for which participants felt unprepared. Patients described playing a passive role in the decision-making process and largely relying on recommendations from the medical team. Patients commonly expressed resignation and a perceived lack of choice or autonomy, leading to dissatisfaction with the outcome.

Conclusions

Understanding and intervening to improve the quality of decision-making regarding post-acute care supports is essential for improving outcomes of hospitalized older adults. Our results suggest that simply providing information is not sufficient; rather, incorporating key contextual factors and improving the decision-making process for both patients and clinicians are also essential.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke RE, Cumbler E, Coleman EA, Levy C. Post-acute care reform: Implications and opportunities for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(1):46-51.CrossRefPubMed Burke RE, Cumbler E, Coleman EA, Levy C. Post-acute care reform: Implications and opportunities for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(1):46-51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson KM, Starkebaum GA, Reiber GE. Veterans using and uninsured veterans not using Veterans Affairs (VA) health care. Public Health Rep Wash DC 1974. 2007;122(1):93–100. Nelson KM, Starkebaum GA, Reiber GE. Veterans using and uninsured veterans not using Veterans Affairs (VA) health care. Public Health Rep Wash DC 1974. 2007;122(1):93–100.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Randall M, Kilpatrick KE, Pendergast JF, Jones KR, Vogel WB. Differences in patient characteristics between Veterans Administration and community hospitals. Implications for VA planning. Med Care. 1987;25(11):1099-1104.CrossRefPubMed Randall M, Kilpatrick KE, Pendergast JF, Jones KR, Vogel WB. Differences in patient characteristics between Veterans Administration and community hospitals. Implications for VA planning. Med Care. 1987;25(11):1099-1104.CrossRefPubMed
19.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The “quicker-and-sicker” story revisited. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990;264(15):1980-1983.CrossRef Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The “quicker-and-sicker” story revisited. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1990;264(15):1980-1983.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluating the Quality of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Post-Acute Care
verfasst von
Robert E. Burke, MD, MS
Jacqueline Jones, RN, PhD, FAAN
Emily Lawrence, MPH
Amy Ladebue, BA
Roman Ayele, MPH
Chelsea Leonard, PhD
Brandi Lippmann, MA
Daniel D. Matlock, MD, MPH
Rebecca Allyn, MD
Ethan Cumbler, MD
Publikationsdatum
09.02.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4298-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.