nach oben

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Erschienen in:

01.01.2014 | Knee

Evaluation of ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area for reconstructed autograft selection

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the size of the native ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area and the size of commonly used autografts. Hypothesis of this study was that the reconstructed graft size with autografts would be smaller than the native ACL size.

Methods

Twelve non-paired human cadaver knees were used. The ACL was carefully dissected, and the mid-substance of the ACL was cross-sectioned parallel to the articular surface of the femoral posterior condyles at 90 degrees of knee flexion. The size of the cross-sectional area of the ACL, and the femoral and tibial footprints were measured using Image J software (National Institute of Health). The semitendinosus tendon (ST) and the gracilis (G) tendon were harvested and prepared for ACL grafts. Simulating an ST graft, the ST was cut in half. The bigger half was regarded as the antero-medial (AM) bundle, and the remaining half was regarded as the postero-lateral (PL) bundle. Simulating an ST-G graft, the bigger half of the ST and G were regarded as the AM bundle, and the smaller half of the ST was regarded as the PL bundle. Each graft diameter was measured, and the graft area was calculated. Simulating a rectangular bone-patella tendon-bone (BPTB) graft, a 10-mm-wide BPTB graft was harvested and the area calculated.

Results

The sizes of the ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area, femoral and tibial ACL footprint were 46.9 ± 18.3, 60.1 ± 16.9 and 123.5 ± 12.5 mm², respectively. The average areas of the ST, ST-G, and BPTB grafts were 52.0 ± 3.8, 64.4 ± 6.2, and 40.8 ± 6.7 mm², respectively. The ST and BPTB grafts showed no significant difference in graft size when compared with the ACL cross-sectional area.

Conclusion

ST and BPTB autografts were able to reproduce the native size of the ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area. The ST-G graft was significantly larger than the ACL cross-sectional area. For clinical relevance, ST and BPTB grafts are recommended in order to reproduce the native size of the ACL in anatomical ACL reconstruction with autograft.

Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V et al (2011) Effect of tunnel position and graft size in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evaluation of time-zero knee stability. Arthroscopy 27:1543–1551PubMedCrossRef

Brophy RH, Selby RM, Altchek DW (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament revision: double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. Arthroscopy 22:683 e1–5

Darcy SP, Kilger RH, Woo SL, Debski RF (2006) Estimation of ACL forces by reproducing knee kinematics between sets of knees: a novel noninvasive methodology. J Biomech 39:2371–2377PubMedCrossRef

Dargel J, Pohl P, Tzikaras P et al (2006) Morphometric side-to side differences in human cruciate ligament insertions. Surg Radiol Anat 28:398–402PubMedCrossRef

Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225PubMedCrossRef

Fu FH (2011) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 34:281–283PubMedCrossRef

Hara K, Mochizuki T, Sekiya I, Yamaguchi K, Akita K, Muneta T (2009) Anatomy of normal human anterior cruciate ligament attachments evaluated by divided small bundles. Am J Sports Med 37:2386–2391PubMedCrossRef

Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM et al (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749PubMedCrossRef

Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Cowden C, Slauterbeck J (2005) An alternative method of anthropometry of anterior cruciate ligament through 3-D digital image reconstruction. J Biomech 38:551–555PubMedCrossRef

10.

Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ et al (2009) Intercondylar roof impingement pressure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:590–594PubMedCrossRef

11.

Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Shirakura K et al (2011) In vitro and in vivo AM and PL tunnel positioning in anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1085–1090PubMedCrossRef

12.

Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G et al (2010) Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1226–1231PubMedCrossRef

13.

Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2010) Impingement pressure in the anatomical and non anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med 38:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef

14.

Iriuchishima T, Horaguchi T, Kubomura T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:674–679PubMedCrossRef

15.

Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Mejia HA, Fu FH (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 2: clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 39:2016–2026PubMedCrossRef

16.

Katouda M, Soejima T, Kanazawa T, Tabuchi K, Yamaki K, Nagata K (2011) Relationship between thickness of the anteromedial bundle and thickness of the posterolateral bundle in the normal ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1293–1298PubMedCrossRef

17.

Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36:1675–1687PubMedCrossRef

18.

Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH (2009) A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:213–219PubMedCrossRef

19.

Kopf S, Pombo MW, Szczodry M, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2011) Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med 39:108–1013PubMedCrossRef

20.

Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 19:297–304PubMedCrossRef

21.

Luites JW, Wymenga AB, Blankevoort L et al (2007) Description of the attachment geometry of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL from arthroscopic perspective for anatomical tunnel placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1422–1431PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

22.

Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Debandi A et al (2011) Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1233–1238PubMedCrossRef

23.

Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T et al (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628PubMedCrossRef

24.

Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H (1997) Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament. A cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med 25:69–72PubMedCrossRef

25.

Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A, Kanagawa H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2011) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon graft: a comparative study with 2-year follow-up results of semitendinosus tendon grafts alone or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 27:1242–1251PubMedCrossRef

26.

Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D et al (2011) Cross-sectional area of posterior extensor muscles of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Spine J 20:1567–1573PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

27.

Race A, Amis AA (1996) Cross-sectional area measurement of soft tissue, a new casting method. J Biomech 29:1207–1212PubMedCrossRef

28.

Romanini E, D’Angelo F, De Masi S et al (2010) Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 11:211–219PubMedCrossRef

29.

Sahasrabudhe A, Christel P, Anne F, Appleby D, Basdekis G (2010) Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef

30.

Shin SH, Jeon IH, Kim HJ et al (2010) Articular surface area of the coronoid process and radial head in elbow extension: surface ration in cadavers and a computed tomography in vivo. J Hand Surg Am 35:1120–1125PubMedCrossRef

31.

Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N et al (2008) Rectangular tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft to mimic natural fiber arrangement. Arthroscopy 24:1178–1183PubMedCrossRef

32.

Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S et al (2008) Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement-a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 24:585–592PubMedCrossRef

33.

Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S et al (2008) Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 24:154–161PubMedCrossRef

34.

Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA (2008) Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med 36:176–189PubMedCrossRef

35.

Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M et al (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34:787–792PubMedCrossRef

36.

Tompkins M, Ma R, Hogan MV, Miller MD (2011) What’s new in sports medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:789–797PubMedCrossRef

37.

Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMed

38.

Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251PubMedCrossRef

39.

Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 39:1789–1799PubMedCrossRef

40.

Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Peterson W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Evaluation of ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area for reconstructed autograft selection
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2014
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2356-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area for reconstructed autograft selection

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

End-stage extension of the knee and its influence on tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG) in asymptomatic volunteers

Is gender influencing the biomechanical results after autologous chondrocyte implantation?

Snapping pes syndrome after total knee arthroplasty

Implantation of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte (MACI®) grafts using carbon dioxide insufflation arthroscopy

Relationship between the skeletal maturation of the distal attachment of the patellar tendon and physical features in preadolescent male football players

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with chondral lesion of the knee

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie