Anzeige
Erschienen in:
03.08.2020 | Original Article
Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Open Rhinoplasty: A Quasi-experimental Study by the Aid of ROE and RHINO Questionnaires
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background and Aims
Rhinoplasty is one of the common plastic surgery procedures which has a high rate in Iran. There are several tools for assessing the outcomes and quality of life after this surgical procedure which rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire and rhinoplasty health inventory and nasal outcomes are two of them. The aim of this study was to investigate the aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty by the aid of ROE and RHINO scales in patients who presented to a referral center in Iran.
Materials and Methods
This prospective, quasi-experimental study was performed on patients who referred to the plastic surgery clinic of Imam Khomeini hospital complex during 2017 to 2019 and underwent open rhinoplasty. ROE and RHINO questionnaires were filled by patients before and 6 months after the surgery. Surgical outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction rate were evaluated in different age groups, genders and educational levels. The data were analyzed by version 21 of SPSS software.
Results
ROE score increased from 51.27 ± 10.54 to 79.6 ± 9.67 (P < 0.001). In addition, RHINO score increased from 64.13 ± 11.43 to 83.36 ± 11.03 (P < 0.001). The most common satisfaction factors among patients in this study were "nose feels more natural" in 62% of patients and "tip rotation is good" in 32% of patients. Furthermore, the most common causes of dissatisfaction in patients were "nose too wide" in 25% of patients and "tip bulbous" in 25% of patients.
Conclusion
ROE and RHINO scales are effective for assessing rhinoplasty outcomes. The satisfaction rate of rhinoplasty is high in Iran and is related to the natural shape of the nose in addition to the tip rotation.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
