nach oben

Skeletal Radiology

Erschienen in:

16.06.2017 | Scientific Article

Evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty: comparison of bone SPECT/CT and MRI

verfasst von: G. Diederichs, P. Hoppe, F. Collettini, G. Wassilew, B. Hamm, W. Brenner, M. R. Makowski

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To test the diagnostic performance of bone SPECT/CT and MRI for the evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone-arthroplasty with histopathology used as gold standard.

Materials and methods

In this cross-sectional study, patients after girdlestone-arthroplasty were imaged with single-photon-emission-computed-tomography/computed-tomography (SPECT/CT) bone-scans using 99mTc-DPD. Additionally, 1.5 T MRI was performed with turbo-inversion-recovery-magnitude (TIRM), contrast-enhanced T1-fat sat (FS) and T1-mapping. All imaging was performed within 24 h prior to revision total-hip-arthroplasty in patients with a girdlestone-arthroplasty. In each patient, four standardized bone-tissue-biopsies (14 patients) were taken intraoperatively at the remaining acetabulum superior/inferior and trochanter major/minor. Histopathological evaluation of bone samples regarding bone viability was used as gold standard.

Results

A total of 56 bone-segments were analysed and classified as vital (n = 39) or nonvital (n = 17) by histopathology. Mineral/late-phase SPECT/CT showed a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%) to distinguish viable and nonviable bone tissue. TIRM (sensitivity 87%, specificity 88%) and contrast-enhanced T1-FS (sensitivity 90%, specificity 88%) also achieved a high sensitivity and specificity. T1-mapping achieved the lowest values (sensitivity 82%, specificity 82%). False positive results in SPECT/CT and MRI resulted from small bone fragments close to metal artefacts.

Conclusions

Both bone SPECT/CT and MRI allow a reliable differentiation between viable and nonviable bone tissue in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty. The findings of this study could also be relevant for the evaluation of bone viability in the context of avascular bone necrosis.

Siopack JS, Jergesen HE. Total hip arthroplasty. West J Med. 1995;162(3):243–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

Caton J, Prudhon JL. Over 25 years survival after Charnley’s total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):185–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(2):171–7.CrossRefPubMed

Zmistowski B, Parvizi J. Identification and treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2012;10(4):509–18.CrossRefPubMed

Burge AJ. Total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging of complications unrelated to metal wear. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19(1):31–9.CrossRefPubMed

Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(7):1710–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pohlemann T, Stengel D, Tosounidis G, Reilmann H, Stuby F, Stockle U, et al. Survival trends and predictors of mortality in severe pelvic trauma: estimates from the German pelvic trauma registry initiative. Injury. 2011;42(10):997–1002.CrossRefPubMed

Sharma H, De Leeuw J, Rowley DI. Girdlestone resection arthroplasty following failed surgical procedures. Int Orthop. 2005;29(2):92–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Velasco JG, Vega A, Leisorek A, Callejas F. The early detection of free bone graft viability with 99mTc: a preliminary report. Br J Plast Surg. 1976;29(4):344–6.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chang LY, Yang JY. The role of bone scans in electric burns. Burns. 1991;17(3):250–3.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1645–54.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Matthews PC, Berendt AR, McNally MA, Byren I. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection. BMJ. 2009;338:b1773.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Atsumi T, Kuroki Y. Role of impairment of blood supply of the femoral head in the pathogenesis of idiopathic osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;277:22–30.

14.

Cruess RL. Osteonecrosis of bone: current concepts as to etiology and pathogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;208:30–9.

15.

Bohuslavizki KH, Brenner W, Kerscher A, Fleiner B, Tinnemeyer S, Sippel C, et al. The value of bone scanning in pre-operative decision-making in patients with progressive facial asymmetry. Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17(7):562–7.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Terheyden H, Warnke P, Dunsche A, Jepsen S, Brenner W, Palmie S, et al. Mandibular reconstruction with prefabricated vascularized bone grafts using recombinant human osteogenic protein-1: an experimental study in miniature pigs—part II, transplantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(6):469–78.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Sarikaya I, Sarikaya A, Holder LE. The role of single photon emission computed tomography in bone imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2001;31(1):3–16.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lisbona R, Rennie WR, Daniel RK. Radionuclide evaluation of free vascularized bone graft viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134(2):387–8.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Even-Sapir E, Mishani E, Flusser G, Metser U. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37(6):462–9.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Forrest N, Welch A, Murray AD, Schweiger L, Hutchison J, Ashcroft GP. Femoral head viability after Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty: assessment with use of [18F] fluoride positron emission tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):84–9.PubMed

21.

Piert M, Winter E, Becker GA, Bilger K, Machulla H, Muller-Schauenburg W, et al. Allogenic bone graft viability after hip revision arthroplasty assessed by dynamic [18F]fluoride ion positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26(6):615–24.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Brenner W, Vernon C, Conrad EU, Eary JF. Assessment of the metabolic activity of bone grafts with (18)F-fluoride PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(9):1291–8.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Brenner W, Vernon C, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Link JM, Conrad EU, et al. Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(9):1493–500.PubMed

24.

Pumberger M, Prasad V, Druschel C, Disch AC, Brenner W, Schaser KD. Quantitative in vivo fusion assessment by (18)F-fluoride PET/CT following en bloc spondylectomy. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(3):836–42.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, Davis RT, Alavi A, Treves ST. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Blake GM, Moore AE, Fogelman I. Quantitative studies of bone using (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate skeletal plasma clearance. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39(6):369–79.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Manenti G, Altobelli S, Pugliese L, Tarantino U. The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of femoral head avascular necrosis. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2015;12(Suppl 1):31–8.PubMed

28.

Imhof H, Breitenseher M, Trattnig S, Kramer J, Hofmann S, Plenk H, et al. Imaging of avascular necrosis of bone. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(2):180–6.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Roth A, Beckmann J, Bohndorf K, Fischer A, Heiss C, Kenn W, et al. S3-guideline non-traumatic adult femoral head necrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(2):165–74.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Kramer J, Scheurecker G, Scheurecker A, Stoger A, Huber A, Hofmann S. Femoral head necrosis. Radiologe. 2009;49(5):410–8.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Mitchell DG, Rao VM, Dalinka MK, Spritzer CE, Alavi A, Steinberg ME, et al. Femoral head avascular necrosis: correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging, and clinical findings. Radiology. 1987;162(3):709–15.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Beltran J, Herman LJ, Burk JM, Zuelzer WA, Clark RN, Lucas JG, et al. Femoral head avascular necrosis: MR imaging with clinical-pathologic and radionuclide correlation. Radiology. 1988;166(1 Pt 1):215–20.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Genez BM, Wilson MR, Houk RW, Weiland FL, Unger HR Jr, Shields NN, et al. Early osteonecrosis of the femoral head: detection in high-risk patients with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2):521–4.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Markisz JA, Knowles RJ, Altchek DW, Schneider R, Whalen JP, Cahill PT. Segmental patterns of avascular necrosis of the femoral heads: early detection with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;162(3):717–20.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Kramer J, Hofmann S, Imhof H. The non-traumatic femur head necrosis in the adult, II: radiologic diagnosis and staging. Radiologe. 1994;34(1):11–20.PubMed

36.

Ficat RP. Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head: early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(1):3–9.PubMed

37.

Mankin HJ. Nontraumatic necrosis of bone (osteonecrosis). N Engl J Med. 1992;326(22):1473–9.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty: comparison of bone SPECT/CT and MRI
verfasst von: G. Diederichs
P. Hoppe
F. Collettini
G. Wassilew
B. Hamm
W. Brenner
M. R. Makowski
Publikationsdatum: 16.06.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2692-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty: comparison of bone SPECT/CT and MRI

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

The magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the anterolateral ligament of the knee in association with anterior cruciate rupture

Imaging features of mammary-type myofibroblastoma of soft tissue: a case series with literature review

Incidental finding in a young man

Visualization of a cam-type femoroacetabular impingement while squatting using image-matching techniques: a case report

The pubo-femoral distance decreases with Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns

Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 2: site-specific etiology, imaging, and treatment, and differential diagnosis

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie