Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2019

09.05.2019 | Editorial Comment

Evaluation of prostate MRI: can machine learning provide support where radiologists need it?

verfasst von: Alexander D. J. Baur, Tobias Penzkofer

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease and tumor grading is a major predictor of prognosis [1]. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a valuable tool to non-invasively detect PCa and has even proven superior compared to systematic biopsy [2]. In order to improve and standardize this technique and its application, guidelines for acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of mpMRI of the prostate have been established [3]. Using a current version of these guidelines, the Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2, and its decision rules, high sensitivities and specificities for the detection of clinically significant PCa can be reached [4]. A major limitation is an only moderate to good interreader agreement [5]. In order to address this issue, an updated version of PI-RADS, version 2.1, has been published just recently [6]. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD et al (2016) A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol 69:428–435CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD et al (2016) A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol 69:428–435CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Padhani AR, Weinreb J, Rosenkrantz AB, Villeirs G, Turkbey B, Barentsz J (2019) Prostate imaging-reporting and data system steering committee: PI-RADS v2 status update and future directions. Eur Urol 75:385–396CrossRefPubMed Padhani AR, Weinreb J, Rosenkrantz AB, Villeirs G, Turkbey B, Barentsz J (2019) Prostate imaging-reporting and data system steering committee: PI-RADS v2 status update and future directions. Eur Urol 75:385–396CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH (2017) Diagnostic performance of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 72:177–188CrossRefPubMed Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH (2017) Diagnostic performance of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 72:177–188CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D et al (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 280:793–804CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D et al (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 280:793–804CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohli M, Prevedello LM, Filice RW, Geis JR (2017) Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:754–760CrossRefPubMed Kohli M, Prevedello LM, Filice RW, Geis JR (2017) Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:754–760CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Wu CJ, Bao ML, Zhang J, Wang XN, Zhang YD (2017) Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 27:4082–4090CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Wu CJ, Bao ML, Zhang J, Wang XN, Zhang YD (2017) Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 27:4082–4090CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett T, Haider MA (2017) The emerging role of MRI in prostate cancer active surveillance and ongoing challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:131–139CrossRefPubMed Barrett T, Haider MA (2017) The emerging role of MRI in prostate cancer active surveillance and ongoing challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:131–139CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of prostate MRI: can machine learning provide support where radiologists need it?
verfasst von
Alexander D. J. Baur
Tobias Penzkofer
Publikationsdatum
09.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06241-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

European Radiology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.