nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

05.06.2020 | Original Article

Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite

verfasst von: G. Plotino, M. Colangeli, T. Özyürek, G. DeDeus, C. Panzetta, R. Castagnola, N. M. Grande, L. Marigo

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of a stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of irrigants during and after the instrumentation compared with that of a conventional activation (CA) performed only after the instrumentation to remove smear layer and debris using different activation devices.

Materials and methods

A total of 70 single-rooted teeth were divided into a control group (no activation, n = 10) and two different experimental groups according to the irrigant activation protocol used: group 1 (CA), in which sodium hypochlorite was activated only after the use of the last mechanical file, and group 2 (SIA), in which activation was performed during and after the instrumentation. The two groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to the activation device used (n = 10): passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI, subgroup a), EndoActivator (EA, subgroup b), and EDDY (subgroup c). The roots were split longitudinally and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the presence of debris and smear layer, and the results were statistically analyzed.

Results

All activation protocols and devices were more effective than control group in removing smear layer and debris from all root canal thirds (P < 0.05), except for CA-EA (group 1b) in the apical third. In the apical third, SIA was found to be more effective than CA (P < 0.05) to remove smear layer and residual debris when PUI was used, to remove the smear layer when EA was used (P < 0.05), and to remove residual debris when EDDY was used (P < 0.05). PUI and EDDY removed statistically more smear layer and debris than EA in the apical third (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The SIA technique improved the smear layer and debris removal from the apical third and debris removal from the coronal third, and PUI and EDDY were more effective than EA in the apical third.

Clinical relevance

The stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) technique may increase smear layer and debris removal.

Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM (2005) Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top 10:30–76

Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ (1965) The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 20:340–349

Plotino G, Cortese T, Grande NM, Leonardi DP, Di Giorgio G, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2016) New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz Dent J 27:3–8PubMed

Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32:389–398PubMed

Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K (2012) In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod 38:445–448PubMed

Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L (2013) Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod 39:1456–1460PubMed

Bahcall J, Olsen FK (2007) Clinical introduction of a plastic rotary endodontic finishing file. Endod Prac 10:17

Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2009) Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 35:791–804PubMed

Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F (2007) Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 33:81–95PubMed

10.

Van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2007) Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 40:415–426PubMed

11.

Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S (2017) Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 21:2681–2687PubMed

12.

Conde AJ, Estevez R, Loroño G, Valencia de Pablo Ó, Rossi-Fedele G, Cisneros R (2017) Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Int Endod J 50:976–982PubMed

13.

Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Bürklein S, Schäfer E (2019) Removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial grooves in straight root canals: sonic activation using EDDY versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and XP-endo Finisher. J Endod 45:322–326PubMed

14.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercade M, Cortese T, Staffoli S, Gambarini G, Testarelli L (2019) Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. J Appl Oral Sci 27:e20180045PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Lea SC, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley AD (2009) Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects. J Dent Res 88:229–234PubMed

16.

Paragliola R, Franco V, Fabiani C, Mazzoni A, Nato F, Tay FR (2010) Final rinse optimization: influence of different agitation protocols. J Endod 36:282–285PubMed

17.

Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Van der Sluis LW (2010) Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal. J Endod 36:143–146PubMed

18.

Haupt F, Meinel M, Gunawardana A, Hülsmann M (2019) Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Aust Endod J 46:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12342CrossRefPubMed

19.

Paqué F, Boessler C, Zehnder M (2011) Accumulated hard tissue debris levels in mesial roots of mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J 44:148–153PubMed

20.

Rödig T, Koberg C, Baxter S, Konietschke F, Wiegand A, Rizk M (2019) Micro-CT evaluation of sonically and ultrasonically activated irrigation on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Int Endod J 52:1173–1181PubMed

21.

Silva EJNL, Carvalho CR, Belladonna FG, Prado MC, Lopes RT, De-Deus G, Moreira EJL (2019) Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars. Clin Oral Investig 23:681–687PubMed

22.

Verstraeten J, Jacquet W, De Moor RJG, Meire MA (2017) Hard tissue debris removal from the mesial root canal system of mandibular molars with ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation: a micro-computed tomography study. Lasers Med Sci 32:1965–1970PubMed

23.

De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, de Siqueira ZA, Perez R, Carvalho MS, Souza EM, Lopes RT, Silva EJNL (2019) Micro-CT comparison of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris from oval shaped-canals. Clin Oral Investig 23:3087–3093PubMed

24.

Violich DR, Chandler NP (2010) The smear layer in endodontics–a review. Int Endod J 43:2–15PubMed

25.

Baumgartner JC, Mader CL (1987) A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 13:147–157PubMed

26.

Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE (2017) Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and file agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology 105:178–183PubMed

27.

Wu MK, Wesselink PR (1995) Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 79:492–496PubMed

28.

Gutmann JL, Saunders WP, Nguyen L, Guo IY, Saunders EM (1994) Ultrasonic root-end preparation Part 1. SEM analysis. Int Endod J 27:318–324PubMed

29.

Paqué F, Al-Jadaa A, Kfir A (2012) Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Int Endod J 45:413–418PubMed

30.

Krishan R, Paqué F, Ossareh A, Kishen A, Dao T, Friedman S (2014) Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. J Endod 40:1160–1166PubMed

31.

Plotino G, Özyürek T, Grande NM, Gündoğar M (2019) Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 52:343–351PubMed

32.

Virdee SS, Seymour DW, Farnell D, Bhamra G, Bhakta S (2018) Efficacy of irrigant activation techniques in removing intracanal smear layer and debris from mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 51:605–621PubMed

33.

Van der Sluis L, Wu MK, Wesselink P (2009) Comparison of 2 flushing methods used during passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal. Quintessence Int 40:875–879PubMed

34.

Fornari VJ, Silva-Sousa YTC, Vanni JR, Pécora JD, Versiani MA, Sousa-Neto MD (2010) Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals. Int Endod J 43:988–994PubMed

35.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Tocci L, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2014) Influence of different apical preparations on root canal cleanliness in human molars: a SEM study. J Oral Maxillofac Res 5:e4PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK (2017) Influence of the apical preparation size and the irrigant type on bacterial reduction in root canal–treated teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 43:1058–1063PubMed

37.

Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E (2009) Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J 42:144–155PubMed

38.

Coldero LG, McHugh S, MacKenzie D, Saunders WP (2002) Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement. Int Endod J 35:437–446PubMed

39.

Júnior ASA, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, De-Deus G, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH (2014) The effect of larger apical preparations in the danger zone of lower molars prepared using the Mtwo and Reciproc systems. J Endod 40:1855–1859

40.

Yang G, Wu H, Zheng Y, Zhang H, Li H, Zhou X (2008) Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:e63–e71PubMed

41.

De-Deus G, Reis C, Paciornik S (2011) Critical appraisal of published smear layer-removal studies: methodological issues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112:531–543PubMed

42.

Rödig T, Döllmann S, Konietschke F, Drebenstedt S, Hülsmann M (2010) Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Endod 36:1983–1987PubMed

43.

Neuhaus KW, Liebi M, Stauffacher S, Eick S, Lussi A (2016) Antibacterial efficacy of a new sonic irrigation device for root canal disinfection. J Endod 42:179–1803

Titel: Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite
verfasst von: G. Plotino
M. Colangeli
T. Özyürek
G. DeDeus
C. Panzetta
R. Castagnola
N. M. Grande
L. Marigo
Publikationsdatum: 05.06.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03358-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Ultrastructural changes of smooth and rough titanium implant surfaces induced by metal and plastic periodontal probes

Effect of intracanal cryotherapy application on postoperative endodontic pain: a systematic review and metaanalysis

The reproducibility of electronic color measurements of the marginal gingiva

Analysis of the smear layer generated by different activation systems: an in vitro study

Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of Rotate instrument with reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel–titanium instruments at body temperature in relation to their transformation temperatures

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter