Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2020

06.02.2020 | Original Scientific Report

Evaluation of the CT Scan as the First Examination for the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Cholecystitis

verfasst von: S. Martellotto, A. Dohan, M. Pocard

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The CT scan has supplanted the abdominal ultrasound for emergency examinations. A comparison of CT scan and ultrasound performance for the diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis in acute care was proposed. The hypothesis is that the CT scan may be sufficient for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, which would allow faster progress to surgery.

Methods

The retrospective study of consecutive patients operated for acute cholecystitis or gallbladder distension with pre-operative imaging within 48 h in one centre.

Results

Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 341 cholecystectomies were performed in our centre. The analysis involved 120 patients. Ultrasound had better sensitivity than the CT scan, respectively, 79.4% [70.5–86.6] and 52.3% [42.5–62.1], but less specificity, with 61.5% [31.6–86.1] and 92.3% [64.0–99.8], respectively. However, there was a significant difference in favour of the CT scan for the diagnosis of complicated cholecystitis (p 0.004). The positive likelihood ratio of complicated cholecystitis is better at CT scan (7.8) [2.7–23.1] than in ultrasound (1.0) [0.1–9.7]. CT scan and ultrasound are equivalent for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, but CT scan is more efficient for the diagnosis of complicated cases (Youden index J 0.3 vs 0.001).

Conclusion

It is possible to place the surgical indication of cholecystectomy on the only data of the CT scan. We propose a decision-making algorithm that uses the CT scan to make the diagnosis and decide on emergency treatment for complicated cases or that allows us to propose a delayed surgery for simple cholecystitis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hastings RS, Powers RD (2011) Abdominal pain in the ED: a 35 year retrospective. Am J Emerg Med 29(7):711–716CrossRef Hastings RS, Powers RD (2011) Abdominal pain in the ED: a 35 year retrospective. Am J Emerg Med 29(7):711–716CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubuisson V, Voïglio EJ, Grenier N et al (2015) Imaging of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in adults. J Visc Surg 152(6):S3–S11CrossRef Dubuisson V, Voïglio EJ, Grenier N et al (2015) Imaging of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in adults. J Visc Surg 152(6):S3–S11CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes CA, Junior CS, Di Saveiro S et al (2017) Acute calculous cholecystitis: review of current best practices. World J Gastrointest Surg 9(5):118CrossRef Gomes CA, Junior CS, Di Saveiro S et al (2017) Acute calculous cholecystitis: review of current best practices. World J Gastrointest Surg 9(5):118CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Watson CJE, Beadsmoore C et al (2007) A randomized, controlled trial of routine early abdominal computed tomography in patients presenting with non-specific acute abdominal pain. Clin Radiol 62(10):961–969CrossRef Sala E, Watson CJE, Beadsmoore C et al (2007) A randomized, controlled trial of routine early abdominal computed tomography in patients presenting with non-specific acute abdominal pain. Clin Radiol 62(10):961–969CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Paolantonio P, Rengo M, Ferrari R et al (2016) Multidetector CT in emergency radiology: acute and generalized non-traumatic abdominal pain. Br J Radiol 89(1061):20150859CrossRef Paolantonio P, Rengo M, Ferrari R et al (2016) Multidetector CT in emergency radiology: acute and generalized non-traumatic abdominal pain. Br J Radiol 89(1061):20150859CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):41–54CrossRef Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):41–54CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey RT, Miller WT (1999) Acute biliary disease: initial CT and follow-up US versus initial US and follow-up CT. Radiology 213(3):831–836CrossRef Harvey RT, Miller WT (1999) Acute biliary disease: initial CT and follow-up US versus initial US and follow-up CT. Radiology 213(3):831–836CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Soyer P, Hoeffel C, Dohan A et al (2013) Acute cholecystitis: quantitative and qualitative evaluation with 64-section helical CT. Acta Radiol 54(5):477–486CrossRef Soyer P, Hoeffel C, Dohan A et al (2013) Acute cholecystitis: quantitative and qualitative evaluation with 64-section helical CT. Acta Radiol 54(5):477–486CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C et al (2013) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 30(6):CD005440 Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C et al (2013) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 30(6):CD005440
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Carrasco M, Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC, Martín-Acebes F et al (2016) Evaluation of early cholecystectomy versus delayed cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. HPB Surg 4614096:1–8CrossRef Sánchez-Carrasco M, Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC, Martín-Acebes F et al (2016) Evaluation of early cholecystectomy versus delayed cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. HPB Surg 4614096:1–8CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayumi T, Okamoto K, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):96–100CrossRef Mayumi T, Okamoto K, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):96–100CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(1):35–46CrossRef Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(1):35–46CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRef DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015—an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015—an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Benarroch-Gampel J, Boyd CA, Sheffield KM et al (2011) Overuse of CT in patients with complicated gallstone disease. J Am Coll Surg 213(4):524–530CrossRef Benarroch-Gampel J, Boyd CA, Sheffield KM et al (2011) Overuse of CT in patients with complicated gallstone disease. J Am Coll Surg 213(4):524–530CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B et al (2015) Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg 150(2):129CrossRef Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B et al (2015) Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg 150(2):129CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Petruzzelli M et al (2006) Symptoms and diagnosis of gallbladder stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(6):1017–1029CrossRef Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Petruzzelli M et al (2006) Symptoms and diagnosis of gallbladder stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(6):1017–1029CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM, Bipat S et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology 264(3):708–720CrossRef Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM, Bipat S et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology 264(3):708–720CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Habenicht KI, Wright CJ, Hunter CT et al (2016) Do radiographic findings of gangrenous cholecystitis in the preoperative setting influence patient outcome? Am Surg 82(1):E28–E30PubMed Habenicht KI, Wright CJ, Hunter CT et al (2016) Do radiographic findings of gangrenous cholecystitis in the preoperative setting influence patient outcome? Am Surg 82(1):E28–E30PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh DD, Cropano C, Fagenholz P et al (2015) Gangrenous cholecystitis: deceiving ultrasounds, significant delay in surgical consult, and increased postoperative morbidity! J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(5):812–816CrossRef Yeh DD, Cropano C, Fagenholz P et al (2015) Gangrenous cholecystitis: deceiving ultrasounds, significant delay in surgical consult, and increased postoperative morbidity! J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(5):812–816CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratanaprasatporn L, Uyeda JW, Wortman JR et al (2018) Multimodality imaging, including dual-energy CT, in the evaluation of gallbladder disease. RadioGraphics 38(1):75–89CrossRef Ratanaprasatporn L, Uyeda JW, Wortman JR et al (2018) Multimodality imaging, including dual-energy CT, in the evaluation of gallbladder disease. RadioGraphics 38(1):75–89CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Li D, Patlas M, Mclean K, Duszak R et al (2018) Relative diagnostic utility of radiologist-recommended abdominal ultrasound following emergency department abdominal and pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Radiol 43(11):3176–3183CrossRef Li D, Patlas M, Mclean K, Duszak R et al (2018) Relative diagnostic utility of radiologist-recommended abdominal ultrasound following emergency department abdominal and pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Radiol 43(11):3176–3183CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of the CT Scan as the First Examination for the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Cholecystitis
verfasst von
S. Martellotto
A. Dohan
M. Pocard
Publikationsdatum
06.02.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05404-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

World Journal of Surgery 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.