Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 7/2019

07.06.2019 | Original Article

Evaluation of the efficacy of immunotherapy for non-resectable mucosal melanoma

verfasst von: Antoine Moya-Plana, Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gómez, Caroline Rossoni, Laurent Dercle, Samy Ammari, Isabelle Girault, Séverine Roy, Jean-Yves Scoazec, Stephan Vagner, François Janot, Alexander M. M. Eggermont, Caroline Robert

Erschienen in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now standard-of-care treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, for rare sub-groups, such as mucosal melanomas, few published data are available, and with no established therapeutic guidelines. Our objective was to assess the response to anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with mucosal melanomas.

Methods

We performed a single-center, prospective cohort analysis of patients with non-surgical locally advanced and/or metastatic mucosal melanoma receiving anti-CTLA4 and/or anti-PD1 immunotherapy from 2010 to 2016.

Results

Forty-four patients were enrolled, including 18 (40.9%) with head and neck, 12 (27.3%) with vulvo-vaginal and 14 (31.8%) with ano-rectal primary tumours. Eleven (25%) patients had stage 3 disease, and 11 (25%) had distant metastases. The first-line immunotherapy was ipilimumab in 24 patients and pembrolizumab in 20. The objective response rate (ORR) was 8.2% (one complete response) for ipilimumab and 35% (four complete responses) for pembrolizumab. No significant difference was observed for primary tumour location. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 4–73). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line ipilimumab and pembrolizumab groups was 3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–4.6] and 5 months (95% CI 2.6–33.1), respectively (p = 0.0147).

Conclusion

In the patients with unresectable and/or metastatic mucosal melanoma, we found ORR and PFS rates comparable to those in patients with cutaneous melanoma, with no significant differences in the types of mucosal surfaces involved. Anti-PD1 therapy has a more favorable benefit-risk ratio than ipilimumab and should be used preferentially.
Literatur
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolchock JD, Chiaron-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey CL et al (2017) Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1345–1356CrossRef Wolchock JD, Chiaron-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey CL et al (2017) Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1345–1356CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmer L, Apuri S, Eroglu Z, Kottschade LA, Forschner A, Gutzmer R (2017) Ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after progression on anti-PD1 therapy in advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer 75:47–55CrossRefPubMed Zimmer L, Apuri S, Eroglu Z, Kottschade LA, Forschner A, Gutzmer R (2017) Ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after progression on anti-PD1 therapy in advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer 75:47–55CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of the efficacy of immunotherapy for non-resectable mucosal melanoma
verfasst von
Antoine Moya-Plana
Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gómez
Caroline Rossoni
Laurent Dercle
Samy Ammari
Isabelle Girault
Séverine Roy
Jean-Yves Scoazec
Stephan Vagner
François Janot
Alexander M. M. Eggermont
Caroline Robert
Publikationsdatum
07.06.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-7004
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0851
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-019-02351-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.