Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2016

07.08.2015 | Original Article

Evaluation of the influence of the definition of an isolated hip fracture as an exclusion criterion for trauma system benchmarking: a multicenter cohort study

verfasst von: J. Tiao, L. Moore, T. V. Porgo, A. Belcaid

Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess whether the definition of an IHF used as an exclusion criterion influences the results of trauma center benchmarking.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study with data from an integrated Canadian trauma system. The study population included all patients admitted between 1999 and 2010 to any of the 57 adult trauma centers. Seven definitions of IHF based on diagnostic codes, age, mechanism of injury, and secondary injuries, identified in a systematic review, were used. Trauma centers were benchmarked using risk-adjusted mortality estimates generated using the Trauma Risk Adjustment Model. The agreement between benchmarking results generated under different IHF definitions was evaluated with correlation coefficients on adjusted mortality estimates. Correlation coefficients >0.95 were considered to convey acceptable agreement.

Results

The study population consisted of 172,872 patients before exclusion of IHF and between 128,094 and 139,588 patients after exclusion. Correlation coefficients between risk-adjusted mortality estimates generated in populations including and excluding IHF varied between 0.86 and 0.90. Correlation coefficients of estimates generated under different definitions of IHF varied between 0.97 and 0.99, even when analyses were restricted to patients aged ≥65 years.

Conclusions

Although the exclusion of patients with IHF has an influence on the results of trauma center benchmarking based on mortality, the definition of IHF in terms of diagnostic codes, age, mechanism of injury and secondary injury has no significant impact on benchmarking results. Results suggest that there is no need to obtain formal consensus on the definition of IHF for benchmarking activities.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2003. Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2003.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tiao J, et al. Establishing consensus on the definition of an isolated hip fracture for trauma system performance evaluation: a systematic review. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014;7(3):209–14. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tiao J, et al. Establishing consensus on the definition of an isolated hip fracture for trauma system performance evaluation: a systematic review. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014;7(3):209–14. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cudnik MT, et al. Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment. J Trauma. 2009;66(5):1321–6. CrossRefPubMed Cudnik MT, et al. Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment. J Trauma. 2009;66(5):1321–6. CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cudnik MT, et al. Are all trauma centers created equally? A statewide analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(7):701–8. CrossRefPubMed Cudnik MT, et al. Are all trauma centers created equally? A statewide analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(7):701–8. CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale. 1990 Revision. Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA; 1990. Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale. 1990 Revision. Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA; 1990.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore L, et al. A new method for evaluating trauma centre outcome performance: TRAM-adjusted mortality estimates. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):952–8. CrossRefPubMed Moore L, et al. A new method for evaluating trauma centre outcome performance: TRAM-adjusted mortality estimates. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):952–8. CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore L, et al. The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):1040–6. CrossRefPubMed Moore L, et al. The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):1040–6. CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1996. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1996.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadimitropoulos EA, et al. Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ. 1997;157(10):1357–63. PubMedPubMedCentral Papadimitropoulos EA, et al. Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ. 1997;157(10):1357–63. PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathens AB, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1164–71. CrossRefPubMed Nathens AB, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1164–71. CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker MJ, Pryor GA. J Myles J. 11-year results in 2846 patients of the Peterborough Hip Fracture Project: reduced morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(1):34–8. CrossRefPubMed Parker MJ, Pryor GA. J Myles J. 11-year results in 2846 patients of the Peterborough Hip Fracture Project: reduced morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(1):34–8. CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez D, et al. Hips can lie: impact of excluding isolated hip fractures on external benchmarking of trauma center performance. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1037–41. CrossRefPubMed Gomez D, et al. Hips can lie: impact of excluding isolated hip fractures on external benchmarking of trauma center performance. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1037–41. CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergeron E, et al. Should patients with isolated hip fractures be included in trauma registries? J Trauma. 2005;58(4):793–7. CrossRefPubMed Bergeron E, et al. Should patients with isolated hip fractures be included in trauma registries? J Trauma. 2005;58(4):793–7. CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuimi BL, et al. Access to a Canadian provincial integrated trauma system: a population-based cohort study. Injury. 2015;46(4):595–601. Kuimi BL, et al. Access to a Canadian provincial integrated trauma system: a population-based cohort study. Injury. 2015;46(4):595–601.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore L, et al. Multiple imputation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma. 2005;59(3):698–704. PubMed Moore L, et al. Multiple imputation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma. 2005;59(3):698–704. PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore L, et al. Evaluating the validity of multiple imputation for missing physiological data in the national trauma data bank. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2(2):73–9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore L, et al. Evaluating the validity of multiple imputation for missing physiological data in the national trauma data bank. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2(2):73–9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of the influence of the definition of an isolated hip fracture as an exclusion criterion for trauma system benchmarking: a multicenter cohort study
verfasst von
J. Tiao
L. Moore
T. V. Porgo
A. Belcaid
Publikationsdatum
07.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0542-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, DICOM-Daten, Videos und Abbildungen. » Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.