Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 5/2018

11.08.2017 | Original Paper

Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery

verfasst von: Fatih Aslan, Berna Yuce, Zafer Oztas, Halil Ates

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (NPGS).

Methods

The study included 32 eyes of 27 patients’ (20 male and 7 female) with medically uncontrolled glaucoma. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgeries performed by trainees under control of an experienced surgeon between 2005 and 2007 at our tertiary referral hospital were evaluated. Residents were separated into two groups. Humanistic training model applied to the one in the first group, he studied with experimental models before performing NPGS. Two residents in the second group performed NPGS after a conventional training model. Surgeries of the residents were recorded on video and intraoperative parameters were scored by the experienced surgeon at the end of the study. Postoperative intraocular pressure, absolute and total success rates were analyzed.

Results

In the first group 19 eyes of 16 patients and in the second group 13 eyes of 11 patients had been operated by residents. Intraoperative parameters and complication rates were not statistically significant between groups (p > 0.05, Chi-square). The duration of surgery was 32.7 ± 5.6 min in the first group and 45 ± 3.8 min in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001, Student’s t test). Absolute and total success was 68.8 and 93.8% in the first group and 62.5 and 87.5% in the second group, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Humanistic and conventional training models under control of an experienced surgeon are safe and effective for senior residents who manage phacoemulsification surgery in routine cataract cases. Senior residents can practice these surgical techniques with reasonable complication rates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bettin P, Di Matteo F (2013) Glaucoma: present and future trends. Ophthalmic Res 50:197–208CrossRefPubMed Bettin P, Di Matteo F (2013) Glaucoma: present and future trends. Ophthalmic Res 50:197–208CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Cai JP, Li Y, Wei RL (2011) Systematic overview of the efficacy of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery in the treatment of open angle glaucoma. Med Sci Monit 17:155–163CrossRef Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Cai JP, Li Y, Wei RL (2011) Systematic overview of the efficacy of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery in the treatment of open angle glaucoma. Med Sci Monit 17:155–163CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsh NH, DeLange J, Wasserman P, Ziémba SL (1998) The “deroofing” of Schlemm’s canal in patients with open-angle glaucoma through placement of a collagen drainage device. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 29:216–226PubMed Welsh NH, DeLange J, Wasserman P, Ziémba SL (1998) The “deroofing” of Schlemm’s canal in patients with open-angle glaucoma through placement of a collagen drainage device. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 29:216–226PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mermoud A, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hédiguer SE, Faggioni R (1999) Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:323–331CrossRefPubMed Mermoud A, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hédiguer SE, Faggioni R (1999) Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:323–331CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Mermoud A (1997) Comparative results of deep sclerectomy transformed to trabeculectomy and classical trabeculectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 210:261–264CrossRef Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Mermoud A (1997) Comparative results of deep sclerectomy transformed to trabeculectomy and classical trabeculectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 210:261–264CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson A, Boulton MG, Watson MP, Moseley MJ, Murray PI, Fielder AR (2005) The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology. Eye 19:1264–1270CrossRefPubMed Gibson A, Boulton MG, Watson MP, Moseley MJ, Murray PI, Fielder AR (2005) The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology. Eye 19:1264–1270CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen MN, Intili A, Ni N, Blecher MH (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in residency training. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 26(1):56–60CrossRefPubMed Cohen MN, Intili A, Ni N, Blecher MH (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in residency training. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 26(1):56–60CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dooley IJ, O’Brien PD (2006) Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:604–608CrossRefPubMed Dooley IJ, O’Brien PD (2006) Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:604–608CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Corey RP, Olson RJ (1998) Surgical outcomes of cataract extractions performed by residents using phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:66–72CrossRefPubMed Corey RP, Olson RJ (1998) Surgical outcomes of cataract extractions performed by residents using phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:66–72CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmer DV, Harrison JC, Carriere VM (1994) Cataract extraction with lens implantation at Biloxi Veterans Affairs Medical Center: experience of ophthalmology residents. Ann Ophthalmol 26:47–49PubMed Zimmer DV, Harrison JC, Carriere VM (1994) Cataract extraction with lens implantation at Biloxi Veterans Affairs Medical Center: experience of ophthalmology residents. Ann Ophthalmol 26:47–49PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruz OA, Wallace GW, Gay CA, Matoba AY, Koch DD (1992) Visual results and complications of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation performed by ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 99:448–452CrossRefPubMed Cruz OA, Wallace GW, Gay CA, Matoba AY, Koch DD (1992) Visual results and complications of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation performed by ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 99:448–452CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pingree MF, Crandall AS, Olson RJ (1999) Cataract surgery complications in 1 year at an academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:705–708CrossRefPubMed Pingree MF, Crandall AS, Olson RJ (1999) Cataract surgery complications in 1 year at an academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:705–708CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimbel HV, Sun R, Ferensowicz M, Anderson Penno E, Kamal A (2001) Intraoperative management of posterior capsule tears in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 108:2186–2189CrossRefPubMed Gimbel HV, Sun R, Ferensowicz M, Anderson Penno E, Kamal A (2001) Intraoperative management of posterior capsule tears in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 108:2186–2189CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ang GS, Whyte IF (2006) Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:623–627CrossRefPubMed Ang GS, Whyte IF (2006) Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:623–627CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Torres-Suarez E, Rebolleda G, Munoz Negrete FJ, Cabarga C, Rivas L (2007) Influence of deep scleral flap size on intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:350–356CrossRefPubMed Torres-Suarez E, Rebolleda G, Munoz Negrete FJ, Cabarga C, Rivas L (2007) Influence of deep scleral flap size on intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:350–356CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sourdille P (1999) Nonpenetrating trabecular surgery: it’s worth the change. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:298–300CrossRefPubMed Sourdille P (1999) Nonpenetrating trabecular surgery: it’s worth the change. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:298–300CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Detry-Morel M, Detry MB (2006) Five-year experience with non penetrating deep sclerectomy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 299:83–94 Detry-Morel M, Detry MB (2006) Five-year experience with non penetrating deep sclerectomy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 299:83–94
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahan E, Drusedau MU (2000) Nonpenetrating filtration surgery for glaucoma: control by surgery only. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:695–701CrossRefPubMed Dahan E, Drusedau MU (2000) Nonpenetrating filtration surgery for glaucoma: control by surgery only. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:695–701CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Drolsum L (2003) Conversion from trabeculectomy to deep sclerectomy: prospective study of the first 44 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1378–1384CrossRefPubMed Drolsum L (2003) Conversion from trabeculectomy to deep sclerectomy: prospective study of the first 44 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1378–1384CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bas JM, Goethals MJ (1999) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy preliminary results. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 272:55–59PubMed Bas JM, Goethals MJ (1999) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy preliminary results. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 272:55–59PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK (2003) A prospective randomised trial of viscocanalostomy with and without implantation of a reticulated hyaluronic acid implant (SKGEL) in open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 87:599–603CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK (2003) A prospective randomised trial of viscocanalostomy with and without implantation of a reticulated hyaluronic acid implant (SKGEL) in open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 87:599–603CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandolfi S, Shaarawy T, Carassa R (2003) Failed non-penetrating surgery. J Glaucoma 12:441–444CrossRefPubMed Gandolfi S, Shaarawy T, Carassa R (2003) Failed non-penetrating surgery. J Glaucoma 12:441–444CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A (2002) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma 11:214–220CrossRefPubMed Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A (2002) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma 11:214–220CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Calvaruso L, Morreale D, Vadalà M, Lodato G (2004) Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with and without phacoemulsification: a randomised clinical trial. J Glaucoma 13:500–506CrossRefPubMed Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Calvaruso L, Morreale D, Vadalà M, Lodato G (2004) Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with and without phacoemulsification: a randomised clinical trial. J Glaucoma 13:500–506CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiselita D (2001) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye 15:197–201CrossRefPubMed Chiselita D (2001) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye 15:197–201CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Suominen SM, Harju MP, Vesti ET (2016) Deep sclerectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:568–574CrossRefPubMed Suominen SM, Harju MP, Vesti ET (2016) Deep sclerectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:568–574CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rękas M, Byszewska A, Petz K, Wierzbowska J, Jünemann A (2015) Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy—a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:591–599CrossRefPubMed Rękas M, Byszewska A, Petz K, Wierzbowska J, Jünemann A (2015) Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy—a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:591–599CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilgin G, Karakurt A, Saricaoglu MS (2014) Combined non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy alone. Semin Ophthalmol 29:146–150CrossRefPubMed Bilgin G, Karakurt A, Saricaoglu MS (2014) Combined non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy alone. Semin Ophthalmol 29:146–150CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gesser C, Wiermann A, Keserü M, Richard G, Klemm M (2014) Long-term follow-up after deep sclerectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 231:535–539CrossRef Gesser C, Wiermann A, Keserü M, Richard G, Klemm M (2014) Long-term follow-up after deep sclerectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 231:535–539CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Suominen S, Harju M, Kurvinen L, Vesti E (2014) Deep sclerectomy in normal-tension glaucoma with and without mitomycin-C. Acta Ophthalmol 92:701–706CrossRefPubMed Suominen S, Harju M, Kurvinen L, Vesti E (2014) Deep sclerectomy in normal-tension glaucoma with and without mitomycin-C. Acta Ophthalmol 92:701–706CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A (2011) Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma 20:21–27CrossRefPubMed Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A (2011) Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma 20:21–27CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ateş H, Uretmen O, Andaç K, Azarsiz SS (2003) Deep sclerectomy with a nonabsorbable implant (T-Flux): preliminary results. Can J Ophthalmol 38:482–488CrossRefPubMed Ateş H, Uretmen O, Andaç K, Azarsiz SS (2003) Deep sclerectomy with a nonabsorbable implant (T-Flux): preliminary results. Can J Ophthalmol 38:482–488CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery
verfasst von
Fatih Aslan
Berna Yuce
Zafer Oztas
Halil Ates
Publikationsdatum
11.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0691-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

International Ophthalmology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.